Well if you're putting that signing on Lou why would Dubas get criticized? To me he would be pretty much off the hook and a simple answer would be that we need to bite the bullet for another year rather than lose a 1st rounder.
You're not getting my point...of course no one wants to have to use Marleau but if the price to pay is giving up a 1st rounder instead of juts keeping him for another year that's a situation to study and possibly manage.
we're not talking about another 3 years of marleau, that's a whole different ball game and that may be worth giving up a 1st rounder to get that off the books.
The Spezza vs marleau comparison is a hockey comparison, forget cap implications for a second. Is Marleau that much worse than Spezza? Could you have just used marleau in the same capacity that Spezza is being used this year and save your 1st rounder?
Anyways, I guess Dubas most likely studied all options to not have to lose that 1st rounder and find a taker.
But to me it was a steep price to pay to get one year at 6.25 off your books