I've always found it funny that the same people who keep going on and on about how leadership is so vitally important to team success are also the same ones that keep aping how Mark Messier is the greatest leader in hockey history without ever mentioning how he kept missing the playoffs with the highest payroll in hockey.
Adding one big leader to a team is like adding one big, tough player with some grit. Yeah, it's nice, but adding that one player doesn't mean that suddenly, a team void of toughness/leadership, the problem will disappear like a snap of the fingers. It can't just be "one guy".
Circa 2005: I told you so
So in a nutshell, leadership is important but it's importance if overstated? I would agree with that.
Very, very overstated and frankly, completely overrated.
Give me a team with chemistry and I doubt you'll ever see "leadership problems".
Why is it that most teams name their top players the captain? Is it because they just so happen to be the best and most qualified leader on the team?
Leadership is tied with chemistry. Leadership is having everyone push in the same direction. Which really when your the one pushing the hardest.
Couldn't agree more.Which is the same thing as team toughness. You gotta have players, big and small, willing to stand up for each other. Adding one tough guy won't change a thing if nobody wants to protect each other.
Changing the culture and having a player that keeps the group tight and show young players how to be a pro is valuable. However how this translates to wins is a whole different matter.
Et si on comparait les Rangers et le Canadien?
Le Canadien doit désormais avoir le courage de reconstruire, entend-on souvent depuis mercredi.www.lapresse.ca
That's one of the reasons I'm patient, I know we're rebuilding even if we're not tanking, and we're not trying to take shortcuts.
Rangers started doing a better job of unloading assets and will do it again with Kreider
They had more expiring contracts than we did, more desirable players. We've pretty much unloaded everyone who's contract was about to expire as well, minus maybe Benn.
In the same period of time the Rangers traded Nash, McDonagh, JT Miller, Grabner, Zuccarello, Hayes and Vesey.
We traded Plekanec, Pacioretty, Galchenyuk, Shaw, Mitchell and Deslauriers. Not sure who else we could have realistically traded. It's going to be interesting to see what we do with Tatar and Petry. I'm expecting both to be traded in 2020.
Good post should be an interesting 5 weeks for us
No Gallagher tonight, didn't travel to Ottawa.
I've always found it funny that the same people who keep going on and on about how leadership is so vitally important to team success are also the same ones that keep aping how Mark Messier is the greatest leader in hockey history without ever mentioning how he kept missing the playoffs with the highest payroll in hockey.
Adding one big leader to a team is like adding one big, tough player with some grit. Yeah, it's nice, but adding that one player doesn't mean that suddenly, a team void of toughness/leadership, the problem will disappear like a snap of the fingers. It can't just be "one guy".