These are the type of risks you take to get a young asset without giving up a ton of asset capital
He was a stud at the WJC , I would be on the phone with Gorton hammering a trade
We traded for another bad attitude in Drouin costing us our top prospect , this wont .
Domi was also pegged with bad attitude, like Galchenyuk
Domi was also pegged with bad attitude, like Galchenyuk
both never asked to be traded..
Domi wanted out for years
yearS? he was there for only 3 years, come on, now you are making shit up..
one bad apple ...you know that saying.. why waste assets to get a kid with an attitude.. to me any young player who has not proved he can play in the NHL is not in a position to demand a trade.. that is red flags ... pass
he never came out and said i want a trade... so its all hearsay you are saying... i stand by my original point, players who have not proved a thing, who are still wet behind the ears are in no position to ask for a trade... if i was a GM, i pass on any player like that..
In hindsight, sure.
Lindros was seen as a generational, could be all-time-great player.
I would never pass up on trading for a player who would openly say, "I don't want to play here" to his current team. Players have a right to say that, the same way organizations have the right to tell them to pound sand.
I think he would. I would knowing how good the package was that landed Lindros.
Evander Kane seems to have fit in with SJS and gave him a big contract , that's a much bigger risk than taking a
chance on a 20 year kid on an ELC
So you'd pass on Eric Lindros?
Cool.