Yep.
But at least 4 on 4 actually resembles normal hockey with extra space. You still get possession changes. 3 on 3 is just waiting for the team with the puck to decide it's time for a shot on net.
Where in this thread was I praising either one in this game? I was critical of both.
I’ve always been an AM fan and have defended him to the critics. But nothing in these elimination games countered his reputation for fading into the background and not coming up in big games.
Oooh a primary assist. Ya he did a great job shovelling the puck to Boldy at the defensive blue line. No way Boldy splits two dman and creates a goal from nothing if someone else shovels that puck
Literally the only time I noticed him other than a stick lift on Marchand which Marchand took...
What are you on about? The Stanley Cup will still be played for and awarded this year. No one has to choose between them. We can enjoy both. Your hypothetical is dumb.
“It catches them in the lie”. Ya great thought experiment there Aristotle.
And spare me the “but someone might get hurt!”...
Well the Finns beat the Swedes 4-1 and Canada just beat the Finns. So I guess using your single game sample logic we can only conclude that you’re a dumb fuck.