Search results

Mine too. The buffering started during the washed Cowboys interview and then re-started during the Taylor walkout.

Officially, no, but Jake Paul's promotion put out this statement earlier: https://x.com/lthomasnews/status/1857569294109876288

I don't usually like draws, but I'm fine with that one.

Saved by the bell.

Part of it was bias. Drafted out of the Q where there were monster number producers every year and two of the d-men were drafted from a pro league with a higher level of competition, and they had good numbers too. You just don't know. There are too many unknown factors for d-men.

There's a strong chance the UFC's headed there. Probably some other pro sports too whenever their TV / streaming contracts are up.

Haven't watched Misa, don't have an opinion on him one way or the other. My guy Boisvert says he doesn't know what to make of him yet. That there isn't one elite quality about him and he's a finesse player.

It doesn't fascinate me at all, it kind of makes sense. A forward's worth is heavily based around his numbers and most of the time, forwards put up numbers right away. It's hard to know how a d-man's going to play in the NHL because we don't know how their defensive play translates nor whether...

That's the best fight of the weekend by a country mile. If Serrano wins, they'll be setting up the greatest women's trilogy in the history of combat sports.

I've read universal acclaim, but I've seen so many people who kinda leave him as an afterthought in discussions. Sort of like, yeah we know he's great, but those others were better. Look at the rankings that are available online. Personal opinion: Bourque has a better case for being the best...

Doug Harvey for clear-cut #1 then? :)

Bourque finished top-5 in Norris voting from the age of 19 as a rookie all the way to the age of 35. That's 17 fucking years. Straight! And after that, he finished 7th, 7th, 3rd, 7th and 2nd in Norris voting before retiring. He finished his career as the highest scoring d-men of all time and...

Whoops, I forgot him. Will add. 1 win & 5 top-3 finishes.

Top 4 d-men are basically indisputable in my mind: Orr's #1, Bourque's #2, Harvey's probably #3, Lidstrom's #4. I can switch Harvey & Lidstrom, I'm open to it. But #1 and #2 are set in stone for me.

Easily. The generational d-men have been: Harvey -> Orr -> Potvin -> Bourque -> Lidstrom -> Makar. When a player has a HHOF resumé at 23 years old? And he hasn't fallen off, he's actually still getting better? At 23, Makar has one Norris & one second place finish, one Conn Smythe, one First...

https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/vegas-golden-knights-brayden-mcnabb-closing-in-on-a-multi-year-extension-1.2205679

Not a generational prospect, no. Hard to call the second best goalie of all time not a generational player, though.

Kucherov's not generational, though.

https://x.com/MarkDivver/status/1856132352868831303