GrandWazoo
Well-known member
Yeah there is #1s and there is perennial Norris candidates
There are default 1`s just like front line centers on bad teamsYeah there is #1s and there is perennial Norris candidates
No. They're not. There are a handful of elite D men and you errantly think that's what a #1 D is.There are default 1`s just like front line centers on bad teams
The Caps in 2018 had John Carlson, not sure he fits a Hedman or Josi.There are default 1`s just like front line centers on bad teams
Yeah that’s like saying there is only a few #1s centers in the league, McDavid, Matthews, Crosby, MacKinnon.No. They're not. There are a handful of elite D men and you errantly think that's what a #1 D is.
WhatThe Caps in 2018 had John Carlson, not sure he fits a Hedman or Josi.
Habs havent had a legit 1C in decades , does that make Desharnais a 1C by defaultYeah that’s like saying there is only a few #1s centers in the league, McDavid, Matthews, Crosby, MacKinnon.
He hasn't won a Norris like Hedman or Josi (your examples), He is a very good offensive d man.. It is pushing it calling him a "beast" IMOWhat
JC has been a beast for years
They both said last year that Suzuki was a 60 point center. He was . . . last year but many of us said that it was silly to assume that he had reached his ceiling. Suzuki is/will be a legit no. 1 center. He just won’t be in the class of 97, 29, 87, etc. He reminds me a lot of Mike Richards in his prime years in Philly.You guys sucks at arguments. There is a range with players, and a lot of range between McDavid, Hischier and Desharnais. Is Malkin a #2 center because he played behind Crosby his whole life? Did Tavares became a #2 the moment he signed with Toronto? What is a #1 anyway? For a center he needs to be the offensive driver and can go against other top lines , ie doesn’t need to be shielded. Same for a #1 defense, it’s the guy that play close to 25 minutes, contribute offense and can go against any line in the league.
Nick is trending to be a 1C this year , keep it goingThey both said last year that Suzuki was a 60 point center. He was . . . last year but many of us that it was silly to assume that he had reached his ceiling. Suzuki is/will be a legit no. 1 center. He just won’t be in the class of 97, 29, 87, etc.
Guhle is 15 games into his career. It's far too early to tell where his ceiling will be but so far he's done exceedingly well against other teams top lines. That's a good early indicator.
The way the Habs have prepared the young guys to be nhl ready so quickly makes me confident their development process has greatly improved.
Guhle's ceiling could be very high.
He hasn't won a Norris like Hedman or Josi (your examples), He is a very good offensive d man.. It is pushing it calling him a "beast" IMO
My brain is hurting from reading that.There are multiple levels of talent
Franchise D are Hedman , Josi types
JC has been a 1D for many years , and he was a fucken beast that year and the playoffs
He continued playing well since then and is more than just an offensive D
Hughes is an offensive D but pure trash defending , JC is a better player
Then you have your , " I got nothing else so he is my 1D or 1C by default types " all over the league