Very fair money for 8 years , thats ridiculous for 4 yearsYeah. That’s why I’m a little sceptical that it’s 7.5X8. That looks more like 4 year money.
Very fair money for 8 years , thats ridiculous for 4 yearsYeah. That’s why I’m a little sceptical that it’s 7.5X8. That looks more like 4 year money.
He’s an elite scorer, Nick is not.hopefully it doesn't piss off Nick but he signed early and salaries have increased since he did
Nick also feeds him most of his goalsHe’s an elite scorer, Nick is not.
I love Cole but Nick is more valuable to the team.He’s an elite scorer, Nick is not.
No question about thatI love Cole but Nick is more valuable to the team.
We must also remember that "being on pace" to score x number of goals is meaningless unless or until you actually score them. So far in his brief career, Cole has shown a lot of promise but he hasn't played a full season. You can pay him fairly without giving up the farm.No question about that
Stuzle , Hughes , M. Tkachuk all sigend in the 8-9.5 range
Cole at 7.5 is more than fair , similar to the Nick deal and move him
The above mentioned are stars and will be top 10-15 point producers for years to comeWe must also remember that "being on pace" to score x number of goals is meaningless unless or until you actually score them. So far in his brief career, Cole has shown a lot of promise but he hasn't played a full season. You can pay him fairly without giving up the farm.
He’s not.I love Cole but Nick is more valuable to the team.
There are a lot more players in the NHL who can feed goal scorers than goal scorers who can bury the feeds.Nick also feeds him most of his goals
pretty much what they said about MSL (Art Ross, Hart, Stanley Cup, Lady Byng)... I am not saying Cole will be as good as MSL, but having him coach Cole sure points in that direction as we are already seeing the benefits ..The above mentioned are stars and will be top 10-15 point producers for years to come
Nothing against Cole but he will never be as good as them
He maybe a 40-50 goal scorer but will be limited to being a one trick pony with no size and no other elements to his game
Tell his agent to pound salt if he wants 8+
Your value is determined by how easy is it is to replace you. Nick may be the better player but he’s also easier to replace. There are very few players who can score goals like Caufield.The above mentioned are stars and will be top 10-15 point producers for years to come
Nothing against Cole but he will never be as good as them
He maybe a 40-50 goal scorer but will be limited to being a one trick pony with no size and no other elements to his game
Tell his agent to pound salt if he wants 8+
Nick is harder to replace and Cole has to prove he can score goals over more several seasonsYour value is determined by how easy is it is to replace you. Nick may be the better player but he’s also easier to replace. There are very few players who can score goals like Caufield.
Exactly , one trick pony but you need goalsI don't think Cole's a great player beyond scoring goals, but I'd be shocked if he isn't a consistent 40-45+ goal scorer.
I wish he was bigger and I wish he did more to impact the game, but 40 goal scorers don't grow on tress, despite the large increase in scoring throughout the NHL. You gotta keep him.
Nick is not harder to replace. You’re not too smart if you think he is.Nick is harder to replace and Cole has to prove he can score goals over more several seasons
See the Dubios thread for evidenceNick us not harder to replace. You’re not too smart if you think he is.
Habs need bothNick is not harder to replace. You’re not too smart if you think he is.