• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Is Mark Hunter overrated?

number17

Mod Squad
To me, Hunter has done a very good job so far. But I have to admit, to get a dman like Dermott with a second rounder, is what really impresses me. I mean this kid for sure is a top four. Possibly at some point, a top two.
I saw this quote from teeds from another thread, which I'm sue speaks for the sentiment of many people (myself included). Not to disagree with the point, but to go off on a tangent, it's interesting while we all praise Hunter daily for the amazing scouting and drafting (and I do too), now that he's been at the helm for 3 seasons, how exactly does his overall drafting record look like, and is he overrated? Or under-rated?

Hunter joined the Leafs in Oct 2014, and had a full season to prepare for the 2015 draft. So it is fair to say him (and his hires) are fully responsible for the 2015 Leafs picks, and they were:

2015
1st round (4th) - Marner
2nd round (34th) - Dermott
2nd round (61st) - Bracco
3rd round (65th) - Nielsen

3rd round (68th) - Dzikerals
4th round (95th) - Lindgren
5th round (125th) - Timashov
6th round (155th) - Desrocher
7th round (185th) - Korostelev

2015 was the McDavid draft, and it was also one of those drafts where people said drafting 6th was as good as drafting 3rd because there was a clear list of talent, who would finish as 1st overall in most other draft years, behind McDavid and Eichel. It made even the first round choice more difficult for Hunter, and he selected Marner. 3 years later now, Marner sure looks like the right choice, as he is a star player in the making. Had he selected Hanifin or Werenski though, I don't think we'd be a lesser team. The big 'pitfall' at the #4 position was really Dylan Strome, who after 3 years still hasn't made the NHL. He is averaging over PPG as a 21 years old in the AHL which is not a total bust, but he's not looking great to become a NHL star, and you also gotta wonder how much of that is the player, and how much is the player development system. Nevertheless, Hunter picked the right guy at 4th overall.

Making a top 5 pick is usually NOT that difficult, so let's move on to his next 2 picks in the 2nd round, which is where usually you can tell how good your scouting really is. Traditionally, the chance of finding a NHLer in the 2nd round is 50%. Most teams can find quality players in the first round (even Edmonton can!) but healthy NHL organizations can continue to get stream of good young (and cheap) players through 2nd round and onward (something EDM could not do for 10+ years and that's why they severely lack depth in their organization). In a lot of ways, I believe late firsts and 2nd rounders are where the scouts earn their paycheck.

With that said, Hunter selected Dermott at 34th and Bracco at 61st in his 2nd round. (I'm going to skip the trades the Leafs made to move down and get 2 picks, because we never know how much of that is a Hunter decision vs Dubas / Lou / Shanny). At only 21 Dermott is looking very good in the #5 role for the Leafs, and nobody would argue if I say he has potential to be a #3 or #4 dman in his prime, and #2 is not entirely impossible as well. Dermott is a solid, solid pick even for a mid to late 1st rounder, to be able to find that in the second round is exactly why Hunter has earned the reputation he has.

Next he selected Bracco, ths smallish skillful F. It was a bit of an homerun pick, and after 3 years I think Bracco is looking decent. He got off to a slow start in the AHL this year, was scratched in 12 of the first 24 games because of his conditioning, but after the new year he got hot in January. But then he cooled off in mid February, and only has 1 point over past 10 games. Since 2018/1/1 he has 9 points in 18 games (42 pts pace). Over the season including his slow start he's playing on 37 pts pace. Not bad for a 21 year old, but not great for an offensive player who doesn't bring much to the table otherwise.

Traditionally the chance of finding any NHLers in 3rd round on is slim (under 25%) and with all these drafted players still only ~ 21 obviously we don't know if they have a NHL future or not. But I think it is fair to say Nielsen and Timashov have a chance to be future NHLers, though not in any major role. The rest, most probably we'll hear less and less from them.



All in all for 2015, Hunted avoided screwing up with the 4th overall pick (and got the star player in Marner), found a gem in Dermot at 34th, and in Bracco, Nielsen and to a lesser extent Timashov he got 3 other players who still got a decent shot at turning into NHLers. I think he did very good with 2015.

In hindsight, even if someones makes the 2015 draft based on what we know about these players today, Marner would still have gone 4th overall, Dermott is probably the right pick at 34th (Though Aho may not be a bad choice either). Bracco, Nielsen, and the rest of the draft don't look out of place either. That's pretty darn good.

We'll look at 2016 later ... stay tuned
 
Last edited:
Too early to say I guess. Too me he's been good but not spectacular. For that I think he needs to have a homerun late round pick as rare as that may be.
 
don't give up on Lindgren yet.


that 2015 draft looks pretty good to me.

the 2016 draft not so much.
 
don't give up on Lindgren yet.


that 2015 draft looks pretty good to me.

the 2016 draft not so much.
Yeah, looks like he may not pan out as a high-end offensive producer, but he's been playing on his team's top pair in the Finnish league all year, and apparently been doing a decent job. That's not too shabby for a 20 year-old (who's also in his first year in that league).

Spending the previous two seasons with the absolute cluster**** that is Modo of the Swedish league probably did his development no favours either.

That's the same team that the Leafs yanked Willy from halfway through his post-draft season, and the same team that ****ed-around Liljegren last year.
 
Clearly not over-rated, he was exactly the right man for the job. In terms of pedigree and knowledge of the junior hockey landscape at that moment in time, the Leafs main need was get value from their early picks to boost the rebuild.
 
Its way too soon to be able to evaluate a draft from 2 years ago, but two full seasons later and it has already produced two key building blocks.

Last time a Leafs draft produced two key building blocks was probably Rask/Stralman in 2005. Before that? Gill/Iafrate? Lanny/Turnbull? We haven't had too many Marner/Dermott type drafts.
 
I also have always liked Dzierkals. Not sure he'll amount to anything, but think he could be a bottom 6 winger in today's NHL.
 
So...I did a pretty extensive write up and then lost it in a crash, which was ****ing lovely.

The long version made very short is that Hunter has been pretty incredible. The 2015 draft was absolutely inspired work where if you redrafted every round using the players available at that selection, you end up in the 6th round before you find a pick that wouldn't get strong consideration for being redrafted at the slot they were taken in. Korostelev in the 7th was a good gamble who didn't work, but wouldn't be considered for redraft as well with hindsight as a guide.

Marner was absolutely the right pick in the 4 spot. He's in the same "BPA" range as Werenski and Provorov (and quite a bit better than Hanifin for reasons I explained but don't have the patience to write twice) but despite the say so of the hockey world at the time, we simply didn't "need" another LHD. Neither Werenski or Provorov would be any sort of upgrade on Rielly and Gardiner. We're further ahead with the similarly impactful Marner than we would be with either of those 3 LHD, however solid a selection they were at the top of that draft. The only pick better than Dermott available for his selection is Aho...getting value out of that selection this close to the draft is inspired stuff.

2016 is a lot more hit and miss imo. Korshkov might turn out to be a pretty big miss with kids like Kyrou, Mascherin, Dahlen, Koukkanen, Debrincat, Girard, Hart, Clague, Hronek, Gustavsson, & Dube on the board. I get that we were trying to out smart everyone with the overages in this draft, but this 2nd round has turned out a lot of high end prospect talent and Korshkov wouldn't make my top 15 in this round if I redrafted it today. With studs like Carter Hart (who was already pretty ****ing good pre draft) in there, this could turn out ugly. Grundstrom and Woll were decent selections, there's a few high upside boom/bust types that I wouldn't mind instead of them, but in a redraft they'd fare well. The rest of the picks appear to be pretty meh with the whole overage value theory falling a bit flat imo.

2017 looks okay so far. Lilly is an awesome get that deep into the 1st round, and was something of a gift from the hockey gods. Redrafted, Lilly probably sneaks into the back of a good looking top 10. Rasanen was a nice selection in the high 50's with no obvious picks I'd take over someone with his package of raw tools. There's a few high scoring forwards you'd consider, but 6'8, mean, mobile and right handed is a good skill set to take a chance on. Ian Scott looks like a swing and a miss, but goalies are ****ing voodoo, so who knows. Kara looks like a swing and a miss, but other than Steenbergen and the other, other Aho, there wasn't a whole lot here. Gordeev is another solid pick at his slot by virtue of also being massive. There's a few scoring wingers to consider instead but I think there's a pretty clear analytic value in massive, crease clearing defenders who can push chances further away from the HD zone and into the mid slot (or higher), while being able to move the puck a bit. Our focus on monster blueliners with these down the list picks the last few years isn't accidental. Middleton, Greenway, Rasanen, Gordeev. McGregor is a huge swing and a miss, and was a head scratcher at the time, but meh...6th round. Same with O'Connell in the 7th. I'd really prefer if we kept swinging at the Korostelev's with these picks, but this isn't going to make or break a draft.

On balance when you take what information we have and measure it, Hunter comes out smelling like ****ing roses imo with the only obvious miss step being the Korshkov pick (how good would our system look with Carter Hart in it?) Almost every other selection made would have that player in the mix for being selected there again if we were re drafting today. That's impressive.
 
Last edited:
most of these 2015 draft picks are still work in progress, but good to see most of them are still within the realm of possibility with a potential NHL future ... and yes Lingren is not completely out of the picture yet.

2015 was definitely a good draft year for Hunter, and there are 2 trades that are worth revisiting.

First one is the the "Konecny trade", which saw Toronto flipping the 24th overall pick for 29th and 61st, and then flipped the 29th for 34th and 68th picks. So all in all, we traded Konecny for Dermott, Bracco and Dzierkals. 3 years later, Konecny is on pace to a 20G 45Pts season in his sophomore year in the NHL, and should be a lock for top 6 winger in the NHL. Konecny is actually a pretty good pick at 24th.

We don't know who made the decision to trade the 24th pick, but I can't see how Lou / Dubas would make the trade if Hunter was high on Konecny, so it's fair to assume Hunter didn't see too much difference in quality of Konecny at 24th compared to other players, including Dermott, which he can get at 34th, and then the 2 extra picks just become free lottery tickets.

Defensemen take longer to develop, but in our case Dermot has already made the NHL this year. He is playing slightly sheltered minutes on the team, which is expected of any 21 years old rookie defenseman. in 26 games with the Leafs, Dermott has averaged over 16:30 minutes, which is more than Carrick, Borgman and Rosen. He's not that far from a #4 dman on this team already (if not for Babs' man-love for Polak he probably would be playing 4th most minute among D already) and his strong 2-way plays makes a convincing case that he should be a safe bet for a middle unit NHL D-man, with some chances of being a competent #3 (or higher).

It's never easy to compare D vs F, but I'd say given where the 2 players are in their young careers, Dermott is not a lesser asset compared to Konecny today. I wouldn't necessarily take Konecny over Dermott today. Which makes Bracco and Dzikerals pure gains.

Dzikerals may not amount to anything, but Bracco still has a decent chance of becoming a middle 6 F in the NHL. The trade has kind of worked out for the Leafs so far, but obviously it is still young for all these players.


The other trade in the 2015 draft, is one can be very significant, but one that never happened. On the draft day when everyone was predicting who Toronto would take with the 4th overall pick - Hanifin, Marner or Strome? The trade rumour that broke out was Toronto has been in discussion with CBJ about trading down from 4th to 8th overall. This trade was sort of confirmed by CBJ after the fact, and some speculated Hunter was not all-in on Marner.

But I don't think that's the case at all. I think what happened was Hunter was laying the ground work in case ARZ, who were drafting 3rd, picked Hunter's guy - whom I believe to be Marner. I think Hunter didn't have faith in Strome, and figured if Marner was already taken at 3rd overall then he might as well trade down to 8th for any one of Hanifin, Zacha, Werenski or Provorov.

And if that's indeed what he was thinking, turns out he's not wrong either, assuming this theory is correct. Of course, when ARZ picked Strome in 3rd, Hunter's guy Marner was available to him at 4th and the trade talk becomes all moot.

It's interesting that 2015 was a very good year for Hunter, not only he drafted all the right guys at the right spots, but even the trades worked out very well for him.

We will see 2016 was not nearly as kind to Hunter.
 
So...I did a pretty extensive write up and then lost it in a crash, which was ****ing lovely.

The long version made very short is that Hunter has been pretty incredible. The 2015 draft was absolutely inspired work where if you redrafted every round using the players available at that selection, you end up in the 6th round before you find a pick that wouldn't get strong consideration for being redrafted at the slot they were taken in. Korostelev in the 7th was a good gamble who didn't work, but wouldn't be considered for redraft as well with hindsight as a guide.

Marner was absolutely the right pick in the 4 spot. He's in the same "BPA" range as Werenski and Provorov (and quite a bit better than Hanifin for reasons I explained but don't have the patience to write twice) but despite the say so of the hockey world at the time, we simply didn't "need" another LHD. Neither Werenski or Provorov would be any sort of upgrade on Rielly and Gardiner. We're further ahead with the similarly impactful Marner than we would be with either of those 3 LHD, however solid a selection they were at the top of that draft. The only pick better than Dermott available for his selection is Aho...getting value out of that selection this close to the draft is inspired stuff.

2016 is a lot more hit and miss imo. Korshkov might turn out to be a pretty big miss with kids like Kyrou, Mascherin, Dahlen, Koukkanen, Debrincat, Girard, Hart, Clague, Hronek, Gustavsson, & Dube on the board. I get that we were trying to out smart everyone with the overages in this draft, but this 2nd round has turned out a lot of high end prospect talent and Korshkov wouldn't make my top 15 in this round if I redrafted it today. With studs like Carter Hart (who was already pretty ****ing good pre draft) in there, this could turn out ugly. Grundstrom and Woll were decent selections, there's a few high upside boom/bust types that I wouldn't mind instead of them, but in a redraft they'd fare well. The rest of the picks appear to be pretty meh with the whole overage value theory falling a bit flat imo.

2017 looks okay so far. Lilly is an awesome get that deep into the 1st round, and was something of a gift from the hockey gods. Redrafted, Lilly probably sneaks into the back of a good looking top 10. Rasanen was a nice selection in the high 50's with no obvious picks I'd take over someone with his package of raw tools. There's a few high scoring forwards you'd consider, but 6'8, mean, mobile and right handed is a good skill set to take a chance on. Ian Scott looks like a swing and a miss, but goalies are ****ing voodoo, so who knows. Kara looks like a swing and a miss, but other than Steenbergen and the other, other Aho, there wasn't a whole lot here. Gordeev is another solid pick at his slot by virtue of also being massive. There's a few scoring wingers to consider instead but I think there's a pretty clear analytic value in massive, crease clearing defenders who can push chances further away from the HD zone and into the mid slot (or higher), while being able to move the puck a bit. Our focus on monster blueliners with these down the list picks the last few years isn't accidental. Middleton, Greenway, Rasanen, Gordeev. McGregor is a huge swing and a miss, and was a head scratcher at the time, but meh...6th round. Same with O'Connell in the 7th. I'd really prefer if we kept swinging at the Korostelev's with these picks, but this isn't going to make or break a draft.

On balance when you take what information we have and measure it, Hunter comes out smelling like ****ing roses imo with the only obvious miss step being the Korshkov pick (how good would our system look with Carter Hart in it?) Almost every other selection made would have that player in the mix for being selected there again if we were re drafting today. That's impressive.

I was pooping my pants over Carter Hart that draft. You don't even need to know anything about the guy beyond his name - Hart!!

My comments in that draft thread would tell the tale. It was a big miss to not get him. He'd be perfect right now, timing wise, waiting in the wings behind Freddy.
 
most of these 2015 draft picks are still work in progress, but good to see most of them are still within the realm of possibility with a potential NHL future ... and yes Lingren is not completely out of the picture yet.

2015 was definitely a good draft year for Hunter, and there are 2 trades that are worth revisiting.

First one is the the "Konecny trade", which saw Toronto flipping the 24th overall pick for 29th and 61st, and then flipped the 29th for 34th and 68th picks. So all in all, we traded Konecny for Dermott, Bracco and Dzierkals. 3 years later, Konecny is on pace to a 20G 45Pts season in his sophomore year in the NHL, and should be a lock for top 6 winger in the NHL. Konecny is actually a pretty good pick at 24th.

We don't know who made the decision to trade the 24th pick, but I can't see how Lou / Dubas would make the trade if Hunter was high on Konecny, so it's fair to assume Hunter didn't see too much difference in quality of Konecny at 24th compared to other players, including Dermott, which he can get at 34th, and then the 2 extra picks just become free lottery tickets.

Defensemen take longer to develop, but in our case Dermot has already made the NHL this year. He is playing slightly sheltered minutes on the team, which is expected of any 21 years old rookie defenseman. in 26 games with the Leafs, Dermott has averaged over 16:30 minutes, which is more than Carrick, Borgman and Rosen. He's not that far from a #4 dman on this team already (if not for Babs' man-love for Polak he probably would be playing 4th most minute among D already) and his strong 2-way plays makes a convincing case that he should be a safe bet for a middle unit NHL D-man, with some chances of being a competent #3 (or higher).

It's never easy to compare D vs F, but I'd say given where the 2 players are in their young careers, Dermott is not a lesser asset compared to Konecny today. I wouldn't necessarily take Konecny over Dermott today. Which makes Bracco and Dzikerals pure gains.

Dzikerals may not amount to anything, but Bracco still has a decent chance of becoming a middle 6 F in the NHL. The trade has kind of worked out for the Leafs so far, but obviously it is still young for all these players.


The other trade in the 2015 draft, is one can be very significant, but one that never happened. On the draft day when everyone was predicting who Toronto would take with the 4th overall pick - Hanifin, Marner or Strome? The trade rumour that broke out was Toronto has been in discussion with CBJ about trading down from 4th to 8th overall. This trade was sort of confirmed by CBJ after the fact, and some speculated Hunter was not all-in on Marner.

But I don't think that's the case at all. I think what happened was Hunter was laying the ground work in case ARZ, who were drafting 3rd, picked Hunter's guy - whom I believe to be Marner. I think Hunter didn't have faith in Strome, and figured if Marner was already taken at 3rd overall then he might as well trade down to 8th for any one of Hanifin, Zacha, Werenski or Provorov.

And if that's indeed what he was thinking, turns out he's not wrong either, assuming this theory is correct. Of course, when ARZ picked Strome in 3rd, Hunter's guy Marner was available to him at 4th and the trade talk becomes all moot.

It's interesting that 2015 was a very good year for Hunter, not only he drafted all the right guys at the right spots, but even the trades worked out very well for him.

We will see 2016 was not nearly as kind to Hunter.

Honestly, our drafting has been so good lately, that I don't even care what happens with 2016.

How can anyone be remotely critical over drafts that produced Rielly, Nylander, Marner, Matthews, Dermott, Brown, Liljegren, and more to come (Johnsson, etc.?)?

I mean, this is a great time to be a Leafs fans. They're legitimately in the later early stages of building a dynasty for us. It's amazing. They all deserve statues outside the ACC.
 
So yesterday we saw 2015 was almost a perfect year for Mark Hunter and our scouting department ... how did they do in 2016?

Now I must state the disclaimer first ... most prospects (unless they're elite players) take more than 2 years to develop, so a lot of our 2016 draft picks are still way too early in their development curve to put a final verdict on them. We can only comment on how the 2016 draft class has done in the first 2 years of their development curves. So don't complain to me "But don't write XXXX off yet!" - no, i'm not writing anyone off and definitely not a 2016 draftee ... but some prospects would obviously look better than others in D+2 years and that's all we're commenting on.

With that said ...

2016
1st round (1st) - Auston Matthews
2nd round (31st) - Yegor Korshkov
2nd round (57th) - Carl Grundstrom
3rd round (62nd) - Joseph Woll

3rd round (72nd) - James Greenway
4th round (92nd) - Adam Brooks
4th round (101th) - Keaton Milddleton
5th round (122nd) - Vladamir Bobylev
6th round (152nd) - Jack Walker
6th round (179th) - Nicholas Mattinen
7th round (182th) - Nikolai Chebykin


2016 was the Auston Matthews year and hockey god finally tip his hat on the Leafs and give us our first 1st overall pick in ages, and not only Matthews is a great player, he's very close to what is generally categorized as generational talent. BUT, since the point of this is to evaluate Hunter, and not Matthews, therefore the first pick becomes a completely moot point for Hunter, cause even my dog (Mat, named after Sundin) would pick Matthews at 1st overall.

So the most important pick for Hunter in 2016 draft pick was really the 31st overall pick, because it's almost like a 1st round pick at #31, and it's a position where you can still find good, maybe even great player. And this is also the pick where Hunter made an 'out of the box' pick with Yegor Korshkov at #31.

And 2 years later, this pick has NOT LOOKED GOOD AT ALL. Remember, when Hunter went up to the podium, a bunch of quality players were still available including Debrincat, Dahlen, Kukkanen, Hart etc. When we selected Korshkov, he was an overager at 20, and he has already gone through the NHL draft once (and went undrafted). And seemingly going off the board with this pick, instead of drafting pure skills like he did in 2015 (and has worked out for him very well), Korshkov is a 6'4 winger who is not the fastest or most skilled forward available at that draft position.

And Korshkov actually got off to a hot start in KHL season right after the draft, but everything changed when he suffered major injury that broke his leg in December. He ended up missing almost half of the KHL season, and when he returned his line wasn't really scoring a lot, he was bumped off the first line, received no PP times ... it just wasn't a good season for him. He still ended the 16/17 season with 19 points in 36 games (0.52PPG), which was still a big improvement over his 15/16 season, but not very impressive for someone taken at #31. In 17/18, the Lokomotiv had another strong season in the unbalanced KHL, but Korshkov's season didn't take another step up. He finished the season with 26 points in 54 games (0.48PPG) and was 5th on the team for scoring, behind ex-Leafs (and much older) Kozun and Kontiola, and then he went pointless in 4 games in the playoff.

Now those are not terrible stats for a 21 years old in the KHL, but you have to consider the position he was drafted (31st, which is almost as good as a 1st round pick!) and players who were taken behind him - including Debrincat and Girard, who not only already made the NHL but have had pretty impressive rookie season. Or, players with very high ceiling such as Carter Hart (who could be the next #1G) ... and there's no way Hunter didn't know about these well known prospects and their potential. So to select an overager like Korshkov, with one can argue has a lower ceiling, it made some fans pretty unhappy. Korshkov is praised in the KHL for the use of his size, his defensive awareness and his cycling game, which can all be useful in the NHL. However at this point he doesn't look good for a top 6 winger, and his chance of being a middle 6 winger is more likely.

After Korshkov, Hunter selected Grundstrom with his second second round pick at #57. Grundstrom, like Korshkov, ALSO suffered a significant injury (knee) in December. However he came back and finished the season strong in SHL, scoring 17 times in the last 35 games, and improved his GPG from 0.41 to 0.49GPG. Further, he had strong performance in the Marlies playoff, WJC. At #57 his expectation is obviously different, but he looks to be a good fit to succeed Uncle Leo as a pesty middle 6 winger who can play in ES, PP and PK, and would get in your face and under your skin. Grundstrom has a good chance to make the Leafs 3rd line as soon as next season.


Behind these 2 2nd round picks, the notable selections are Joseph Woll and Adam Brooks. Woll just finished his 2nd NCAA season with .916SV%, which is an improvement over his rookie season, but moreover because of how poorly he started the season, he actually finished very strong which is always good to see. Along the season he also played for team USA in the WJHC and finished with a bronze medal (though he was pulled in the semi-final game). He's only 19 which is really really young, plus he's a goalie which means all the stats at this point are almost completely irrelevant.

Brooks, like Korshkov, is another overager. He built upon his draft season in the WHL and had another strong D+1 season in the WHL, albeit as an overager. When he made the transition to the Marlies in 17/18 though, he almost hit a brick wall. First he had mono, which definitely affected his energy level. He struggled at both ends of the rink in his first pro season, and worse, he was pushed off from C to wing early in the season. When asked about it, Keefe said he doesn't see Brooks as a full time center, but more as a forward who he sees comfortable playing in C or W depending on the game situation. He added he is still learning the defensive side of game which makes him uncomfortable to play him in center.

This is bad news for the Leafs and Brooks because one thing about Brooks, is he is pretty much the only Leafs-drafted C prospect have in the system, and behind Gauthier and Aaltonen, he's the next in depth chart for C in the Leafs system. Good news is, as the season moved on, and the Marlies lost players to NHL promotion and injuries, Brooks found himself back in the center on a line with Bracco and Marchment, and that line has begun to click. As of today Brooks has 7 points in 44 games with the Marlies, which is not looking good once you factor in he is already 21, and next season he'll be 22 going in on 23. The leash is definitely very short on Brooks because if he can't make the Leafs in the 18/19 season (and I don't think he can) then what kind of future does a 24 year old 'prospect' have in this organization after the 18/19 season?


And once again, all of these 16 draftees only have 2 years of development to evaluate on, which isn't much. But given what we know today, it sure wasn't a good draft year for Hunter. If I am to give Hunter an "A-" for his 2015 draft, then I don't know if I can even give a "C" for his 2016 draft. Behind Auston Matthews (which we have hockey god / lottery to thank for, not Hunter), Grundstrom is the only one who looks like a good bet to be a future NHLer, and that is in a draft year that includes a #31 overall pick. The hindsight at #31 is the biggest reason I don't think Hunter delivered for this draft year. When names like Debrincat, Carter Hart, Aspund, Kukkonen etc. were pretty much public knowledge, and Hunter went off the board to select an overager in Korshkov, and then all those other prospect followed up with good D+1 and D+2 seasons and Korshkov did not ... it's hard to just sweep that under the rug.

2017 draft is obviously too too early to even attempt to evaluate on, but it seems like of the first 2 drafts that Hunter did for the Leafs, he had a very good year, and a pretty subpar year. The jury is still out on most of these prospects so we shall see how these prospects pan out in the next 2 years.
 
Last edited:
Great read N17, this board has been missing these types of threads for a while.
 
assuming Korshkov doesn't pan out, I'm not sure a miss on a second round pick is enough to call him overrated yet. Especially when it's looking like Dermott is an excellent pick at a similar slot.

Having said that there won't be any top 10 picks for quite a while, hopefully, and the constant need for young cheap talent will put Hunter more under the microscope. At the moment I'd say we need to find centres and goalies. although grabbing a star with a non top pick is welcome at any position.
 
Leafs are also doing a great job luring developed Euro-talent over to the Marlies/Leafs, not often as cheap as your own picks - but part of the pipeline of players teams need to stay competitive and cap compliant.
 
I still think its too early to write off Korshkov. Would like to see him come over to the Marlies, and see if they can turn him into anything.
 
I agree that it's too early to write him off as a potential NHL body who can be decent for us...but there are absolutely a bunch of guys who were available at that slot, who were drafted right after, who have progressed far better since the draft.

Korshkov should be a big bodied NHL winger with a bit of offensive upside.
 
You seem to be having computer, or should I say software, issues, ME. Maybe it's time to make the shift over to linux and say **** you to Bill Gates and Steve Jobs.
 
You seem to be having computer, or should I say software, issues, ME. Maybe it's time to make the shift over to linux and say **** you to Bill Gates and Steve Jobs.

Probably internet issues most likely.

I've been playing with simple miner on Linux for my crypto builds recently, but I can't see myself making the jump for day to day browsing.
 
Back
Top