Disallowance is in the constitution but is never used.
Why not just ask him to demand Nutanyahu give up Jerusalem as that is just as likely.
We are talking about domestic policy, something JT can do, not something he can't do.
I'm pretty sure Bill 101 is also partly in force due to the notwithstanding clause, so there's another reason why the feds couldn't trample over it, even if they didn't like it and wanted to lose every seat in Quebec in the next election.
Well even if Trudeau can't directly, he's definitely able to talk to Couillard. He can do something, let's not pretend he's powerless. Some of our basic freedoms of speech are being trampled on here. If JT truly is set on real change, he can start right here in Quebecistan.
It has been in effect for almost 40 years. I don't disagree with you that the law is a gross violation of human rights but it is what it is. No Quebec govt that wants to stay in power will change it. No federal party wants to risk having to face the 3rd Neverendum so it won't push for any change. You sound like one of the angryphones who posts on the FB English language rights group.
I'm an angryphone because I believe in equal rights? If my rights weren't suppressed I wouldn't be angry now would I. You don't know what it's like because you don't live here. Take a look at this BS:
http://www.cjad.com/cjad-news/2015/11/05/gaspe-hospital-ordered-to-remove-english-signs
But your posts say Muslims... you dont define it as radicals only.. the way you wrote it looks like you are talking about all
I noted the Iranian Swede on the Senators is growing a beard and starting to look more radical.
Didn't know he is jews, yes maybe... who knows, Jews are cheap doesn't matter how much money they makemaybe he wanted Silfverberg traded as he didn't want a cheap jew on the team
:couch
Didn't know he is jews, yes maybe... who knows, Jews are cheap doesn't matter how much money they make![]()