• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: The News Thread

Previously, when the overhead in developing an artist cost a shit load of money, these companies with their inhouse marketing departments, distribution networks, etc just made sense. Every arm that made them worthwhile corporations actually providing a service has been made obsolete or is in the process of being made obsolete. Their only function now is as a gateway to content that they own. As celebrities come to realize that they don't need these monstrous vampire bats clinging to them, they'll continue to move away from it. For an artist to earn a million dollars off of a DVD, they'd typically have to sell 20 million dollars worth of DVD's.

and before the "well...Louis has to pay employees, etc, etc" argument comes out....he already had to, except he would have been paying the employees of the corporation he had his publishing deal with...they recoup all of that shit before they calculate your cut on the vast majority of contracts.

Yep. These old dinosaur methods are dead, but the unions running that show refuse to let it die. They even manage to get SOPA to the floor of Congress with their whining and dining.
Ask Sally Taylor, (daughter of James Taylor), about how to get a recording deal.
 
No they aren't. They don't have individual membership with votes for leadership and voted on constitution, etc, etc.

They're trade groups. AKA lobbies.

Big difference.
 
They don't operate like a union, more importantly, they're not structured like one.

They're a run away trade group.
 
I seriously doubt obama has the balls to place oil sanctions against Iran so this is nothing but posturing.

Of course, when Iran announces it's shiny nukes, we will hear the "we tried our best" malarkey.

~~~~~~~~~~~

Noise Level Rises Over Iran Threat to Close Strait of Hormuz

Iran and the United States elevated the belligerent tone between them on Wednesday over an Iranian vow to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital Middle East waterway for oil tanker traffic, if Western powers attempted to make good on their threat to stifle Iran’s petroleum exports.

Rear Adm. Habibollah Sayyari, Iran’s naval commander, said that “Iran has total control over the strategic waterway,” and that “Closing the Strait of Hormuz is very easy for Iranian naval forces,” in remarks carried by Press TV, an official Iranian news site. Admiral Sayyari, whose forces are in the midst of an ambitious war-games exercise in waters near the Strait of Hormuz, was the second top Iranian official to make such a threat in 24 hours.

Both the Defense Department and the United States Navy’s Fifth Fleet, which is based in Bahrain and patrols the Strait of Hormuz, responded to Admiral Sayyari’s remarks in statements that suggested American warships would stop the Iranians if necessary.

“The free flow of goods and services through the Strait of Hormuz is vital to regional and global prosperity,” Lt. Rebecca Rebarich, a spokeswoman for the Fifth Fleet command in Manama, Bahrain, said in an emailed response. “Anyone who threatens to disrupt freedom of navigation in an international strait is clearly outside the community of nations; any disruption will not be tolerated.”

The statement also said “The U.S. Navy is a flexible, multi-capable force committed to regional security and stability, always ready to counter malevolent actions to ensure freedom of navigation.”

George Little, the Pentagon press secretary, issued a similar warning, but he also pointed out that the Pentagon was “unaware of any aggressive or hostile action directed against U.S. ships” at this time.

France weighed in with a reaction to the Iranian threat as well, calling on Iran to respect international law regarding the strait, which is 21 miles wide at its narrowest point and separates Oman and Iran. Bernard Valero, a spokesman for France’s Foreign Ministry, told reporters at a regular news briefing: “The Strait of Hormuz is an international strait. As a result, all ships regardless of their nationality benefit from the right of transit in line with the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and international maritime customs.”

On Tuesday, Iran’s vice president, Mohammad Reza-Rahimi, was the first top Iranian official to explicitly threaten to close the Strait, saying that if Western powers “impose sanctions on Iran’s oil exports, then even one drop of oil cannot flow from the Strait of Hormuz.”

The catalyst for the Iranian threats are new efforts underway by the United States and European Union to pressure Iran into disbanding its nuclear program, which Iran has refused to do despite four rounds of sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council.

Those sanctions have not targeted Iran’s oil exports, the world’s third largest. But in recent weeks, the European Union has talked openly of imposing a boycott on Iranian oil, and President Obama is preparing to sign legislation that, if fully enforced, could impose harsh penalties on all buyers of Iran’s oil, with the aim of severely impeding Iran’s ability to sell it. If successful, the measure would create onerous new pressure on the Iranian economy, which is already fraying from the accumulated effects of the other sanctions.

Iran has said its uranium enrichment is purely peaceful, but an International Atomic Energy Agency report issued last month suggested that Iran may be working on a nuclear weapon and a missile delivery system for it. The United States and its allies have said that a nuclear-armed Iran would be unacceptable.

The Strait of Hormuz, with two mile-wide channels for commercial shipping, connects the Sea of Oman to the Persian Gulf, the principal loading point for oil shipped from Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil exporter. The Strait carried 33 percent of all oil shipped by sea in 2009 and nearly 20 percent of all oil traded worldwide, according to the United States Energy Information Administration, which has called it the world’s most important “oil chokepoint.”

Markets seemed to shrug off Iran’s threats. On Wednesday, the price of the benchmark crude oil contract on the New York Mercantile Exchange fell for the first time in more than week and was trading at just below $100 a barrel at midday.

Elisabeth Bumiller contributed reporting from Washington.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/w...er-iran-threat-to-close-strait-of-hormuz.html
 
I seriously doubt obama has the balls to place oil sanctions against Iran so this is nothing but posturing.

Of course, when Iran announces it's shiny nukes, we will hear the "we tried our best" malarkey. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/w...er-iran-threat-to-close-strait-of-hormuz.html

Riiiiiiiiiiiight. Because oil sanctions would go a long way toward putting a stop to Iran wanting Nukes. Hilarious. Can I have some of what you're smoking?
And you DO remember that there is a different thread for American politics, right? Or are you blinded by the Christmas feast?
 
Early Christmas morning, police were called to the home of Mayor Rob Ford about a reported domestic dispute. It was the second such call in as many months.

On Oct. 25, less than 15 hours after Ford himself called 911 regarding the intrusion of the comedy show This Hour has 22 Minutes on his property, officers from 22 Division were back at the Etobicoke residence on a domestic call.

On Christmas, Ford’s mother-in-law called police between 4 and 5 a.m. to report that the mayor had been drinking and was taking his children to Florida against the wishes of his wife, Renata.
The Toronto police Youth and Family Violence Unit, which handles all domestic disputes, including incidents that are strictly verbal, is still investigating both events. No charges have been laid.
An interview request submitted to Ford’s office, which detailed the contents of this story, went unanswered.

According to numerous police and emergency service sources, 911 calls to the mayor’s Edenbridge Dr. home are a reality for the South Etobicoke division. Exactly how many calls have been made is unknown.

The calls leave police in an uncomfortable quandary. Ford is the city’s chief magistrate. The mayor — or a designate acting on his behalf — has a seat on the police board. In fact, four of the seven board members are appointed by city council. Police Chief Bill Blair reports to this civilian oversight board.

The chief was unavailable for comment Thursday, according to spokesman Mark Pugash, who said Ford’s position “absolutely” does not put police in a difficult situation.

“The procedures don’t take into account the social position or occupation of a person being investigated or charged.”
Oh really? So those procedures were followed to the letter after the G20 incidents? Rather disingenuous, don't you think?

Through sources, the Star has heard about a handful of incidents in recent years, but a freedom of information request to the police service for a list of 911 calls relating to homes on Edenbridge Dr. over a five-year period was only partially granted. The dates for calls were removed.

A secondary request filed specifically for Oct. 25 was denied in part because the personal information was gathered “as part of an investigation into a possible violation of law.”

Sources say senior police officials are aware of these calls and there have been discussions on how to deal with media questions about them. Only one other domestic dispute involving Ford has ever been reported.

In March 2008, Ford, then still a councillor, called 911 after a conflict with Renata. Ford said she was acting “irrational.” He left their home with the couple’s children. Police later charged him with assault and uttering a death threat. Both charges were dropped two months later due to inconsistencies in Renata’s story. At the time, Ford told reporters the couple had begun counseling and that he supports his wife and she him.

Four years later, the 911 calls persist.
link
 
Canadians needing help abroad can turn to consular officials for a wide range of services, but apparently getting your mother-in-law out of your house isn't one of them.

That's what a Canadian living in Cairo, Egypt found out when she asked consular officials to escort her obviously beloved mother-in-law from the woman's home.

This and other anecdotes were released this week by the Department of Foreign Affairs as it listed ways it can - and can't - help Canadians who run into problems in other countries.

The family of one man, who had been arrested for trafficking drugs in Ger-many, apparently asked the federal government to fly a helicopter into the prison yard to rescue him in action-movie style.

"They were very surprised to learn this wasn't a service provided," the department said in a release.

Other bizarre requests reportedly made of consular staff included picking up a man's dog at the Beijing air-port after staff refused to let it on a flight due to a lack of proper paperwork.

Then there was the Canadian visiting Chicago who asked for help getting tickets for The Oprah Winfrey Show.

Mind you, it wasn't only Canadians embarrassing themselves.

"A U.S. citizen called wanting to know how she could get a Canadian pass-port," the department explained.

"When told she could not get one, because she was not a Canadian citizen, she said that she thought an American going to Canada needed a Canadian passport."

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Mo...ar+officials/5927537/story.html#ixzz1i1njIoOu

So nice to know that downright stupid and batshit crazy are not exclusive to one nation...
 
mystery-giant-soldier-at-the-funeral-of-kim-jing-il-pic-getty-images-667449816.jpg

Some have suggested that the figure is North Korean basketball star Ri Myung Hun, who stands at 7’ 9” tall.
The 44-year-old sportsman once held the title of the world’s tallest man.


Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-st...er-kim-jong-il-115875-23668476/#ixzz1i1qomD1i

North Korea doctoring images?? Nah, couldn't be...
 
Arab Spring........

Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood just made a few assertions that have ruffled the nation's secular and Christian populace.


Essam el-Erian: "No one dares oppose the application of Sharia law."
At a conference attended by some 5,000, Senior Muslim Brotherhood leader, Dr. Essam el-Erian, Vice President of the "Freedom and Justice" party, the Brotherhood's political wing, declared that "No one in Egypt—not a Copt, a liberal, a leftist, no one—dares say they are against Islam and the application of Sharia: all say they want the Islamic Sharia [applied]. And when referendum time comes, whoever says 'we do not want Sharia' will expose their hidden intentions."

He went on to threaten Egypt's Supreme Council of Armed Forces with "massacres" if it interfered in politics and Islam's role in the constitution and addressed the nation's Coptic Christians as follows: "You will never find a strong fortress for your faith and rights except in Islam and Sharia," adding, "Our Lord has commanded us to be just, and we have learned it from Islam. We do not wish to hurt anyone…"

More to the point, his Brotherhood colleague, Sheikh Sayyid Abdul Karim, asserted: "Those who do not wish to see Islam [Sharia] applied are drunks, druggies, adulterers, and brothel-owners."

While such talk is commonplace from Egypt's self-styled Salafists, it is significant that the Muslim Brotherhood, which has mastered the art of stealth, the art of appearing "moderate"—to the point that President Obama's intelligence chief described them as "largely secular"—is beginning to feel comfortable enough to let snippets of the truth come out.

http://www.raymondibrahim.com/2011/11/muslim-brotherhood-only-drunks-druggies

~~~~~~~~~~

The sweet irony in all of this is that the liberals and leftist will be the FIRST ones to be eliminated by the ultra conservative MB.

Did I mention eliminated?
 
Last edited:
this news is no suprise to those of us who were saying from, oh, probably about 5 mins after this uprising started that this would likely happen and that mubarak would be preferable to this bunch.
 
this news is no suprise to those of us who were saying from, oh, probably about 5 mins after this uprising started that this would likely happen and that mubarak would be preferable to this bunch.

From the left...with perfect hindsight, Bush going into Iraq to bring democracy was crazy because it was going to disintegrate into tribal politics and Islamism.

Ten years later, the left was jumping up and down in supporting the "Arab Spring" because it was going to do what? Not disintegrate into Islamism and tribal politics?

Bush bad. Arab Spring good. Results? The same.
 
Noooooo, it is different because the USA had nothing to do with the beginnings of Arab spring. It was brought about by the people. THE PEOPLE!

The way Iraq should have happened. Not with an invasion and 9 year occupation.
 
yes, but don't you understand his point? whether it was US-backed or not, those crazy f*ckers don't know how to govern themselves democratically right now without falling back into a 9th century islamist model. i think we can conclude that no matter how saddam would have ended, iraq was very likely in for a ton of sectarian violence on its way to an islamist gov't.
 
Yep, those A-rabs can't govern themselves. Just like negros and womenfolk. We should have nice whitey-approved dictators in place for them too!
 
Back
Top