worm
Well-known member
Your reply seems to say otherwiseI got your silly point.
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
Your reply seems to say otherwiseI got your silly point.
Yes and it was musguided. But I would also be critical if they designed a team full of 5'9 players.yet they have in the past
that is the point
Yes and it was musguided. But I would also be critical if they designed a team full of 5'9 players.
Your reply seems to say otherwise
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
I miss xpofanHardly, I was making fun of it.
No team has four top scoring LWs on the same team. It was a silly proposition in the first place.
I miss xpofan
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
Send him a message, may he will come back.
that is the beauty of skill it comes in all shapes and sizes
as the LW example showed
There is also many different skills involved in hockey, shooting, passing, skating, but also puck retrieval. There is a reason the typical hockey line involved a shooter, a playmaker and a guy that goes into the corner and retrieves pucks. Some small guys are decent at the latter, but usually some size and strength helps in that area.
Chris Peters' mock draft 1.0 has us taking Brady Tkachuk at #4.
http://www.espn.com/nhl/insider/story/_/id/22333345/nhl-opening-2018-nhl-mock-draft-first-round
My "skill skill skill" comment from yesterday was more so just saying our team sucks because we're lacking talent, not because no one came to Byron's defence after Parayko drilled him from behind.
The reason why the dressing room is quiet is become the team sucks. Alzner is one of the main culprits behind the sucking.
They can laugh and be as upbeat as they damn well please - it's not gonna stop them from sucking.
So we at the moment are gonna have a fairly high first round pick and two early second rounders. (which is not a rebuild but not to shabby). Maybe more if Shaw or some one gets dealt. Who do we go after??