GrandWazoo
Well-known member
Tampa definitely takes him.we can as no one will take him but Hughes disagrees with me
Unless you think they prefer Matt Tomkins.
Tampa definitely takes him.we can as no one will take him but Hughes disagrees with me
Why didn`t they claim Jones , better option than PrinoTampa definitely takes him.
Unless you think they prefer Matt Tomkins.
Why didn`t they claim Jones , better option than Prino
same as Primeau then.Jones has sucked since 2018
same as Primeau then.
Yeah never thought of that...Or the opposite, hoping he gets lit up so they can send him down safely.
and who has shown absolutely no reason to think he will anything more than JAGI’ll take a flyer on the guy who’s 10 years younger, thank you very much
not bad , but that 2nd goal weak glove hand would concern me.Primeau was OK.
He's working hard but not producing much, like Slaf, Suzuki, and lately Newhook.RHP is not a top 6 fwd
Stop this experiment , he is a bottom 6 player and nothing moreHe's working hard but not producing much, like Slaf, Suzuki, and lately Newhook.
You're supposed to block shots with your shin pads, not your hands. It's not basketball. And if you're going to block a shot then commit to it and take it facing forward. So many guys turn away and wind up getting hit on the side of the knee where there's no padding.I know shot blocking is a big cultural thing, but with the amount of players that we've lost because of blocking shots maybe it's worth re-evaluating whether it's truly worth it, or at least try to separate safe shot blocks from dangerous shot blocks.
"Competing" for a top 3-4 pick.Stop this experiment , he is a bottom 6 player and nothing more
On good teams he is in the minors looking for a job
Time to put Slaf on the top line and let them develop some chemistry
Team isnt competing for anything this year
I'd prefer #2. Less chance of blowing it or missing out and no pressure of having the first overall pick in a non-generational draft class."Competing" for a top 3-4 pick.
I think Eiserman could become a generational sniper.I'd prefer #2. Less chance of blowing it or missing out and no pressure of having the first overall pick in a non-generational draft class.
not for us, no matter the player (other than Caufield), drafted by us and your offence withers.I think Eiserman could become a generational sniper.
This is a huge often repeated misconception.not for us, no matter the player (other than Caufield), drafted by us and your offence withers.