• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Babs

hobarth

Member
What can we learn from the Cup champions both this year and last year and how Babs coaches?

Pitts has 3 elite forwards and by the time the dust settled with the coaching change and the new coach became familiar with his team, those 3 players were played on 3 separate lines. Chicago has 2 elite forwards and rarely do they play on the same line. This spread out the wealth made defending against these teams extremely difficult. The Kessel line looked very good and was very effective during the playoffs and that was most likely due to the elite player Kessel elevating the games/effectiveness of his linemates. Crosby doesn't score for 7 games yet Pitts still wins the Cup. Talent is essential to win championships but so is depth so having the talent spread out rather than concentrated, the quality of Pitts' depth was seemingly greater and an essential component of their Cup win.

What does this have to do with Babs, when he was coaching Detroit Datsyuk and Zetterberg rarely played together no matter how desperate the team was for more offense. Babs has always spread out the wealth on his teams and we've seen that he wouldn't improve Kadri's linemates to find more offense. TO might have Marner and Matthews on the team this year but I doubt we'll ever see them playing together as this isn't how Babs coaches which I think is the best way to maximize all of the assets of a team. Maybe Marner and Matthews will someday be good enough to win a scoring championship but I think on a Babs coached team they would have to do it with players like Kane plays with on Chicago rather than doing it together on one line.

I look at teams like Dallas and Anaheim and basically they load up one line which is very successful during the regular season but as a Cup winning strategy will probably always be wanting in the cap era.
 
Perhaps more importantly:

Matt Larkin: "Past five Cup champions' rankings in score-adjusted Corsi: 2nd, 3rd, 1st, 2nd, 2nd. Tough for even greatest skeptics not to see correlation."
 
That's a lot of words that say nothing.

Exactly my thoughts.

For someone who typed 2 full paragraphs, he said a whole lot of nothing.

I look forward to Mindzeye telling hobarth on how wrong he is and hobarth disappearing again.

Pointless thread is pointless.
 
He basically said "you need offensive depth to win titles"...which isn't wrong at all. But Timmy is spot on, he used a few hundred words to say "you need offensive depth to win titles", which is ostensibly a throw away statement, something that isn't a surprise to anyone who watches hockey.
 
Heh, I remember when Pat Quinn used to get shit on for separating Sundin/Mogilny/Roberts (or was it Nieuwendyk?)
 
The top point-getters in the league usually make their hay on the powerplay when coaches tend to put all of their talent on the ice at the same time.

So will Matthews and Marner get ice-time together? Of course they will.
 
I used to write essays like that in grade 10.

Your essays then were probably more cogent and readable than anything hobarth will produce. Another waste of keystrokes from EeyoreCanucks. Babs is a great coach, anyone pointing to the results in the standings with this current iteration is simply obtuse.
 
Back
Top