• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

GDT: Canes v. Devils 3/28 5:00

Tryamw said:
Still not sure what the ref saw to call that charge
Click to expand...
Me either. This is the rule on charging. I’m not sure which criteria that check met.

Rule 42 - Charging

42.1 Charging - A minor or major penalty shall be imposed on a player
who skates, jumps into or charges an opponent in any manner.
Charging shall mean the actions of a player who, as a result of
distance traveled, shall violently check an opponent in any manner. A
“charge” may be the result of a check into the boards, into the goal
frame or in open ice.
 
andyt said:
Me either. This is the rule on charging. I’m not sure which criteria that check met.

Rule 42 - Charging

42.1 Charging - A minor or major penalty shall be imposed on a player
who skates, jumps into or charges an opponent in any manner.
Charging shall mean the actions of a player who, as a result of
distance traveled, shall violently check an opponent in any manner. A
“charge” may be the result of a check into the boards, into the goal
frame or in open ice.
Click to expand...
If the NHL is going to enforce this ridiculously amorphous rule, maybe they can add a more, like Loitering or Showboating.
 
Last edited:
After a disappointing first period, I really liked the way we took over the 2nd and 3rd. We got to our game and didn't give the Devils any room to breathe.
 
I mean … I’m not sure how “clear” it is to “go through” the Hurricanes. Unless you plan on getting your forechecking game on Florida’s level of course. Puck moving D ain’t it, boss. Disturbing their possession game with your own is.
 
Tryamw said:
Still not sure what the ref saw to call that charge
Click to expand...
He saw a Ghost. It was right there, man.

Seriously, he couldn’t tell you either. He threw his arm in the air and made up his mind what to call afterward. Typical NHL nonsense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top