deandebean
Active member
We would all do it. Still can't figure out why they signed him back.I am ready to trade Matheson for Edvinsson
We would all do it. Still can't figure out why they signed him back.I am ready to trade Matheson for Edvinsson
We all are, except Detroit. Although they do like picking up our discarded D.I am ready to trade Matheson for Edvinsson
LeaderdebeansWe would all do it. Still can't figure out why they signed him back.
Ya, I don't think he's that much of a leader. He's a veteran, that's for sure. But he should have been traded at the time, to allow Engstrom to join earlier. Today, Engstrom would have been a 3rd year young vet, instead of a rookie. And even though we might not have made the playoffs two years ago, it wouldn't have mattered that much in the development of this youth. I think Matheson is a progress stopper for this group because he plays too many minutes. They could have traded for a better option at the back end, and for a real 3rd line D.Leaderdebeans
Why MM has a gold contract , SE is looing at 9-10 milI am ready to trade Matheson for Edvinsson
Fine print counsellor .. NMC yrs 1-3 BUT does not need to be protected for expansion, will not take up a retention slot.Doesn't Mikey Math has a full NMC as well? Nice job there, HuGo.
Plamondon a dit "ta yeule" a CarneyHaha, great to be back with the loyalist blokes.
Ya, I don't think he's that much of a leader. He's a veteran, that's for sure. But he should have been traded at the time, to allow Engstrom to join earlier. Today, Engstrom would have been a 3rd year young vet, instead of a rookie. And even though we might not have made the playoffs two years ago, it wouldn't have mattered that much in the development of this youth. I think Matheson is a progress stopper for this group because he plays too many minutes. They could have traded for a better option at the back end, and for a real 3rd line D.
Your not getting a good second pair D at his salaryexcellent point..even tho I defend Math, I wondered if we should have turned him into assets back then because we're stacked at LHD.
One Huston emerged and Dobson was acquired, Matheson became a little redundant. HuGo must like him in the room.
Also, he's a Montrealer who loves playing in Montreal. I think that matters to HuGo.excellent point..even tho I defend Math, I wondered if we should have turned him into assets back then because we're stacked at LHD.
One Huston emerged and Dobson was acquired, Matheson became a little redundant. HuGo must like him in the room.
If it was that easy.... YaI am ready to trade Matheson for Edvinsson
If Guhle could stay healthy I'd be more behind that. And Engstrom seems to play the right side a bunch.excellent point..even tho I defend Math, I wondered if we should have turned him into assets back then because we're stacked at LHD.
One Huston emerged and Dobson was acquired, Matheson became a little redundant. HuGo must like him in the room.