lecoqsportif
Well-known member
Carrier may have been our move. It’s proving to be a shrewd one.
They're winning without Savard. Carrier made him expendable so I think he's gone regardless of standings.We're not going to make any big moves, but we might not be selling much either. We'll see where we are in two months.
Carrier has been good but not playing Barron has been better.Carrier may have been our move. It’s proving to be a shrewd one.
Not sure HuGo view adding 3rd / 4th rounders as value add over maintaining team chemistry & letting Savard walk as UFAThey're winning without Savard. Carrier made him expendable so I think he's gone regardless of standings.
I think he'll get a second and if he does he's gone. Likely a 26 or 27 second rounder.Not sure HuGo view adding 3rd / 4th rounders as value add over maintaining team chemistry & letting Savard walk as UFA
They could always resign him in the summer. They won't but they could.Plus treating Savard “right” (re: family) is a good advertising for UFAs down the road.
I'm assuming now that Matheson is stayingWe're not going to make any big moves, but we might not be selling much either. We'll see where we are in two months.
And playing Guhle on the left side, and playing Hutson with Matheson . . . and Dach waking up . . . and Laine’s return injecting a huge boost . . . They all add up.Carrier has been good but not playing Barron has been better.
Good coachingAnd playing Guhle on the left side, and playing Hutson with Matheson . . . and Dach waking up . . . and Laine’s return injecting a huge boost . . . They all add up.
Not really. Carrier has been complimentary to Savard, allowing a vet on each pairings. Without Savard, it’s Struble and no D depth. Savard was playing 17-18 minutes a game, Struble has been playing like 11.They're winning without Savard. Carrier made him expendable so I think he's gone regardless of standings.
Stay the course and continue the rebuildWe're not going to make any big moves, but we might not be selling much either. We'll see where we are in two months.
Not playing Struble won't help him improve but there's no reason to keep Savard if the return is reasonable. This is not a cup team.Not really. Carrier has been complimentary to Savard, allowing on bet on each pairings. Without Savard, it’s Struble and no D depth. Savard was playing 17-18 minutes a game, Struble has been playing like 11.
If we’re in a playoff spot or close to one, he stays. Plus he’s been such a warrior for the team the past 4 years, i don’t think the locker room would take it too well. It would take a first rounder to make Hughes think twice about it.
Savard is gone with any reasonable offer , locker room will surviveNot really. Carrier has been complimentary to Savard, allowing on bet on each pairings. Without Savard, it’s Struble and no D depth. Savard was playing 17-18 minutes a game, Struble has been playing like 11.
If we’re in a playoff spot or close to one, he stays. Plus he’s been such a warrior for the team the past 4 years, i don’t think the locker room would take it too well. It would take a first rounder to make Hughes think twice about it.
Not playing Struble won't help him improve but there's no reason to keep Savard if the return is reasonable. This is not a cup team.
They won’t jeopardize a potential playoff run (even if just one round) for a couple of picks, unless maybe first rounders. We already have 9 picks in the first 4 rounds this year.Stay the course and continue the rebuild
The " da mix " means nothing in the grand scheme of things
Keep selling if the offers are right and dont add depth ,Habs have all the depth they need
Most of these UFA `s have no future with us and cant be foolish to turn down a good offer
Check out Gadget player vs Quim Hughes skating metrics.
View: https://x.com/HabsOnReddit/status/1877111009619378276?s=19