We're talking about MLSE having the balls to bury a bad LARGE contract. Lots of teams fiddle with small amount and eat the cost. That's no advantage over another club.
Cause a buyout is different than burying a contract in the minors.
$$$... what's the difference to MLSE?
I don't doubt that the Leafs clearly have a monetary advantage when it comes to their profitability. But as of now, they haven't shown any penchant for eating large contracts.
$$$
I don't doubt that the Leafs clearly have a monetary advantage when it comes to their profitability. But as of now, they haven't shown any penchant for eating large contracts.
All I'm saying is that this advantage hasn't been exercised by them, or any other big market team...and I'm not sure if we will see it anytime soon.
AGAIN... explain to me what is the difference between MLSE giving Tucker 2/3rds of a 9 million dollar contract (6 MILLION) to go away and sending Finger down to the AHL for this year and next (7 MILLION)
carry the 5, add 3, divide by 1, squared to the power of 2
....I think it's a difference of only 1 million dollars.
I dont think he would want to do it. Just if the right deal came along he would do it.
1 MILLION