• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Leaf Rumours

We're talking about MLSE having the balls to bury a bad LARGE contract. Lots of teams fiddle with small amount and eat the cost. That's no advantage over another club.

Again, if MLSE will buyout Tucker's 9 million dollar deal, why won't they bury Finger's 3.5 million this year and next?
 
A cost is a cost, it all ends up on the hockey ops budget, doesn't matter what column it's in.

I figured a finance guy would grasp that pretty easily.
 
... what's the difference to MLSE?
$$$

I don't doubt that the Leafs clearly have a monetary advantage when it comes to their profitability. But as of now, they haven't shown any penchant for eating large contracts.

All I'm saying is that this advantage hasn't been exercised by them, or any other big market team...and I'm not sure if we will see it anytime soon.
 
I don't doubt that the Leafs clearly have a monetary advantage when it comes to their profitability. But as of now, they haven't shown any penchant for eating large contracts.

Darcy Tucker
 
$$$

I don't doubt that the Leafs clearly have a monetary advantage when it comes to their profitability. But as of now, they haven't shown any penchant for eating large contracts.

All I'm saying is that this advantage hasn't been exercised by them, or any other big market team...and I'm not sure if we will see it anytime soon.

AGAIN... explain to me what is the difference between MLSE giving Tucker 2/3rds of a 9 million dollar contract (6 MILLION) to go away and sending Finger down to the AHL for this year and next (7 MILLION)
 
AGAIN... explain to me what is the difference between MLSE giving Tucker 2/3rds of a 9 million dollar contract (6 MILLION) to go away and sending Finger down to the AHL for this year and next (7 MILLION)

carry the 5, add 3, divide by 1, squared to the power of 2

....I think it's a difference of only 1 million dollars.
 
carry the 5, add 3, divide by 1, squared to the power of 2

....I think it's a difference of only 1 million dollars.

1 million dollars is a lot to the Sens. Think of all the terrible actors you could hire to embarrass your franchise with that money.
 
I dont think money is the issue.

It is the message it sends to other teams/players.
Which Burke probably doesn't care about but it might hurt him in getting some Euro free agents or whatever.

I dont think he would want to do it. Just if the right deal came along he would do it. So I dont expect Finger to be in the minors.
 
I dont think he would want to do it. Just if the right deal came along he would do it.

Pretty much what he's been saying all summer. If I need the money, I'll do it.

Anyone saying that there's no way MLSE would approve it is, as KB would say batshit insane, IMO.
 
while one million isn't a deal breaker, there is something to be said about MLSE's possible lack of willingness to do whatever it takes to win. They bball team has been a loser forever, soccer team is yet to be seen but haven't won anything, and the Leafs..............well they are the Leafs.
 
I really think it's more about incompetence than not wanting to win.

All they needed to do was hire someone who knew what they were doing and go on their merry way selling condos and raking in the dough. Since Burke took over, I'm not sure how much you can bash them. We have the most expensive GM, the most expensive assistant GM, we've doubled our scouting staff in size, and our new practice facility is raved about by all incoming players.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top