Cox keep saying Hamhuis is top on Burke's list.
I don't quite understand the logic behind it - if there's any truth to the Cox rumor. In fact, with sort of a bidding war for Hamhuis, he will most likely fetch $5.5M in the open market. That's overpaying him by quite a bit, as he plays a similar game to Beauchemin - whom we're paying $3.75M per.
If we trade Kaberle, we need someone who can move the puck and QB the PP - and that's NOT Hamhuis.
And it'd be bad cap management if we trade away Kaberle at $4.25M and sign Hamhuis for say, $5.5M.
woh. hold on a sec.When Burke trades Kaberle + Schenn for Ryan, the Leafs are going to need a dman.
woh. hold on a sec.
If we trade Kaberle + Schenn, there had better be something other than Ryan coming back our way.
Not that I think we can't give up Schenn + Kabby, but that's a hefty, hefty price to pay ... it takes away 2 defensemen from our top 4, and the blueline that Burke was so proud of doesn't look nearly as good anymore.
Kabby is obviously on the block, and I can consider trading Schenn too, but for that package there'd better be a better package than just Bobby Ryan coming back.
That said, I can understand why Anaheim wants 2 d-men ... they need to replace Niedermayer, and potentially the departing Wisniewski.
I was shocked at how many execs believe Toronto will make a run. In the past year, Brian Burke cleared out Nik Antropov and Alexei Ponikarovsky because he felt they were guys who were happy with a 5-2 loss, as long as they got both goals. Kovalchuk certainly has battled that reputation. The rationale from outside? Some form of: Toronto's in trouble, needs offence and some excitement. Sure it's speculation, but these guys are smarter than I am. Maybe Burke fools us all.