Montana
Champion
Do you still think it was just depth if he tried to extend him?
Some pretty expensive depth.
You think it's plausible he was talking cheap extension with him, with the plan of him being a #2 to Reimer?
Do you still think it was just depth if he tried to extend him?
Some pretty expensive depth.
You think it's plausible he was talking cheap extension with him, with the plan of him being a #2 to Reimer?
Yeah, I heard it. GMs do things you like and things you don't. It's always the case. On the balance things so far, he's been overwhelmingly positive.
Yeah, shame on him for looking for some depth. Jesus.
You cannot seriously believe they were looking for a $5.8m third string goalie?
That doesn't go with what BL said about Nonis being what's best for the future of Scrivens, does it?
It's not a logical conclusion at all. You don't give a guy an extension for a year beyond when you're planning on sending him to the AHL. It doesn't make any sense.
You cannot seriously believe they were looking for a $5.8m third string goalie?
sounds about as smart as teeds method of picking up women
might end up being the third stringer like komi/finger
Yeah, whatever. I'm sick of being bashed for having this opinion so I'm just gonna shut up and thank god Kipper said "he didn't feel right taking an extension, because he didn't want to come here and let us down". See? Even Kipper knows he sucks.
What?
I'm so glad we stuck with our young, cheap goalies putting up solid numbers and getting us to the playoffs.
Luongo even agrees his contract is terrible and no one wants him.
It was silly. He was looking for goaltending depth, not a guy to replace Reimer. Which is what was silly to think. Saying so is not bashing.
For ****'s sake. 5.8 million is not a good option for depth. How is that silly?
nonis was definitely saved by kipper saying no.
this is fine, though.
if reimer gets hurt again or falters in the playoffs the goalie market is wide open next summer with a whole whack of solid free agent tenders plus luongo ripe for the picking.
Did anyone say that was a silly viewpoint? No.