• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Leaf Rumours

To be fair, Calgary may have agreed to cover a portion of the contract. Again, no use arguing unless we are privy to the parameters of the agreement.
 
Montana said:
Quite the opposite in fact.....virtually everyone agreed it would be silly to (a) acquire him to be the #1, and (b) take on his full salary/extend him, if he was the #2.
Click to expand...

And when it was rumoured that he WAS in fact talking extension with Kiprusoff's camp, you guys criticized the source of the rumour.

Then Nonis admitted just now that he was talking extension. And you guys still seem to be arguing for reasons I can't understand.
 
hockeylover said:
And when it was rumoured that he WAS in fact talking extension with Kiprusoff's camp, you guys criticized the source of the rumour.

Then Nonis admitted just now that he was talking extension. And you guys still seem to be arguing for reasons I can't understand.
Click to expand...


Still arguing?......I think it's patently insane Nonis was considering signing Kipper to an extension.
 
Montana said:
Still arguing?......I think it's patently insane Nonis was considering signing Kipper to an extension.
Click to expand...

BL is saying that it's possible Nonis was going to send him to the Marlies next year even in light of Nonis admitting he was planning the extension. That's what I'm arguing. I guess when you jumped in, it sounded like you were supporting his argument.
 
hockeylover said:
BL is saying that it's possible Nonis was going to send him to the Marlies next year even in light of Nonis admitting he was planning the extension. That's what I'm arguing. I guess when you jumped in, it sounded like you were supporting his argument.
Click to expand...


Yeah, I never thought he was getting him for the Marlies......I felt it was to be the #2, most likely. (and still do, tbh)
 
hockeylover said:
Did you hear what he said about Bozak, BL? You might want to hold off on the praise...
Click to expand...

Beleafer is the arbiter of what we're allowed to whine and bitch about, HL.

He's allowed to whine and bitch about management's use of Bozak ALL YEAR LONG, but we're not allowed to whine and bitch for even a day or two over the kipper trade that was finalized.
 
I still can't believe he spent even a minute looking into getting Kipper. What the ****?

I lost pretty much all confidence in the guy with this little almost-fiasco.

Hopefully it's retardation that only extends to goaltending and not other positions. Otherwise, if he's willing to take a shitty experienced wash up and play them over good young players, we got a problem.


And **** trade deadline day. I never get any work done. Which is embarassing the last couple of years when we've done nothing anyway. Why the hell don't they make it on a Saturday or Sunday?
 
Just heard Dreger on the fan talking about Luongo. He said it got pretty close and that is why Luongo was pulled off the ice, but the Leafs never made a counter offer at any point.
 
leafman101 said:
Just heard Dreger on the fan talking about Luongo. He said it got pretty close and that is why Luongo was pulled off the ice, but the Leafs never made a counter offer at any point.
Click to expand...

So if we ever offered anything the nucks would have taken it basically.
 
Luongo is worthless just like we are said. We also said the media was wrong in saying Florida wanted him. Florida has no interest.
 
So now that the deadline passed with the "overpaid" Luongo and "garbage" Kipper being acquired by the Leafs, are we going to have a group unbunching of our panties? Like the whole board was on the rag for 3 days.
 
Deckie007 said:
So now that the deadline passed with the "overpaid" Luongo and "garbage" Kipper being acquired by the Leafs, are we going to have a group unbunching of our panties? Like the whole board was on the rag for 3 days.
Click to expand...

Easy, Reimer will get knocked out of the next game in the first period, Scrivens will suddenly start looking like a rookie, and people will question why Nonis didn't go out and get a veteran backup.
 
hockeylover said:
BL is saying that it's possible Nonis was going to send him to the Marlies next year even in light of Nonis admitting he was planning the extension.
Click to expand...

I'd like to see the quote from Nonis, before debating this any further. He said very clearly that he was looking at him for depth and as the third guy. I'd like to see this quote of him talking about an extension. I take his words about it being a depth move at face value. Why? Because everything Nonis has done as GM related to youth opportunity has been supportive of the youth.

What do those who claim he's doing otherwise have? Your claim he was talking extension without any explanation of why he was doing that. Wafer thin evidence in the face of all else he's said and done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top