• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

New Canadian Politics Thread

I look forward to the day when a major party leader or PM in Canada can actually be openly non-religious.

I’m pretty sure that still hasn’t happened yet, which is kinda nuts in 2022.
Well PET got away with being a bachelor, which is something no US politician with ambitions for the White House can even think about being.
 
So for all the talk of Trudeau and the Liberals being tyrants, Doug Ford and the PC’s just invoked the notwithstanding clause of the Charter of Rights for the third time today.

This time, to strip education workers of the right to strike and collectively bargain, and to impose a new contract on them.

Kinda heading down a slippery slope where none of the rights guaranteed in the Charter are worth the paper they’re printed on.
 
So for all the talk of Trudeau and the Liberals being tyrants, Doug Ford and the PC’s just invoked the notwithstanding clause of the Charter of Rights for the third time today.

This time, to strip education workers of the right to strike and collectively bargain, and to impose a new contract on them.

Kinda heading down a slippery slope where none of the rights guaranteed in the Charter are worth the paper they’re printed on.

This is gonna get ugly.
 
So for all the talk of Trudeau and the Liberals being tyrants, Doug Ford and the PC’s just invoked the notwithstanding clause of the Charter of Rights for the third time today.

This time, to strip education workers of the right to strike and collectively bargain, and to impose a new contract on them.

Kinda heading down a slippery slope where none of the rights guaranteed in the Charter are worth the paper they’re printed on.

Did you hear that? I think I hear the Freedom Convoy warming up their engines to fight for the labour freedoms of their fellow Canadians.


.......my mistake, I actually don't hear a thing from them.
 
I don't understand the notwithstanding clause. Is it unchallengable? What's the point of they can just do this?
 
Is it unchallengable?

No, the Feds can over rule if they decide to get involved. It all happens so rarely that there's barely precedent for anything here, so who knows. If I'm Justin right now though, after finding out how hard Dougie tried to fuck me with the Convoy, I'd be apt to stir up some shit though.

What's the point of they can just do this?

It's supposed to be politically damaging to do this shit. It's one of those whole "norm" things that are supposed to hold the system up when the rules get abused.
 
No, the Feds can over rule if they decide to get involved. It all happens so rarely that there's barely precedent for anything here, so who knows. If I'm Justin right now though, after finding out how hard Dougie tried to fuck me with the Convoy, I'd be apt to stir up some shit though.



It's supposed to be politically damaging to do this shit. It's one of those whole "norm" things that are supposed to hold the system up when the rules get abused.
I see, thanks. People's memories are short. By next election cycle this will be a distant memory. Interested to if feds do anything.
 
If the Feds didn’t do anything the times Quebec used it they won’t do anything now. Several provinces have used the notwithstanding clause in the past.
 
Last edited:
Throughout its history, the notwithstanding clause has most often been used by Quebec, no doubt.

Though if we’re talking about Francois Legault & Doug Ford specifically, Doug was the first to use it.

When both came to power in 2018, Ontario had never used it before and the most recent time Quebec had used it was 2005. But then Dougie broke the seal on it in order to empower himself to get some petty payback on his enemies in Toronto city council and slash the number of council seats in half in the middle of a municipal election.
 
Back
Top