JaysCyYoung
Legend
After a brief hiatus last year during which Irish and I did not produce an entry into our annual Top Eligible Prospects list, we are pleased to present a return to the tradition with this year's Top 50 eligibles.
A few things to take into consideration when using these rankings as a guide, however: (1) Our rankings are often reflective of a compromise between the two of us. We form these rankings together and therefore differ on placement. The final rankings often reflect this compromise, and sometimes a player one of us likes more than the other is listed in a place in exchange for a higher or lower placement of a different player later on in the rankings. (2) Our risk/reward section is based on draft placement as well. The higher or lower that a player is ranked on a list affects how we judge their risk factor. Everything is relative. There is a lot less risk in attempting a home run selection on a player with a lot of potential but a high bust probability in the third or fourth round, rather than in the first. (3) This list is by no means authoritative. I have deferred to Irish on players that he has seen more than myself, or read more about, and in turn he has deferred to a few players that I consider personal favourites. This ties into the first note regarding compromise. Our NHL player comparisons, notably, should not be taken as a direct comparison or a projection, but merely a stylistic comparison. For instance, in comparing Jack Eichel to Mike Modano, we are only suggesting that there are similarities in their size, position, creativity, and Eichel's potential as a future franchise player. By no means does it indicate that he will become a future first-ballot Hall of Famer.
With that in mind, here are our official 2015 Top 50 Draft Eligible Rankings:
1. Connor McDavid 6'1" 195 C Erie Otters (OHL) G: 44 A: 76 PTS: 120 NHL Comparable: Does Not Exist ISS Rank: 1 CSS Rank: 1 THN Rank: 1
Wolfie Says: What can be said about Connor McDavid that hasn’t been said already? He may be the best player to enter the league since Mario. You’re getting a total elite skill package with this player.
Jays Says: The phrase generational talent gets thrown around far too often these days, but with McDavid, it’s an apt description. Connor possesses phenomenal offensive instincts and skating ability, with the ability to handle the puck at top speed, and finish plays at will. He can beat defenders in a myriad of ways, using both craftiness, and a bit of edge to drive the net. He can pass, shoot, finish, and has tremendous leadership characteristics. In short, McDavid is a future franchise pillar to whoever drafts him. He has the talent to be an all-time great.
Risk: N/A Reward: 5/5
2. Jack Eichel 6'2" 196 C Boston University Terriers (HE) G: 24 A: 43 PTS: 67 NHL Comparable: Mike Modano ISS Rank: 2 CSS Rank: 2 THN Rank: 2
Jays Says: The type of franchise player that would go first overall in virtually any other draft. Is recognized for his fantastic play-making skills, but is an equally talented goal-scorer with a deceptive shot and natural finishing ability. Changes gears with ease and is an excellent skater. Has the type of creativity that will make him a mainstay on highlight reels for years to come.
Wolfie Says: Eichel has a phenomenal set of hands to go with a great skating stride. He’s going to score a lot of goals in the NHL off the rush. He can drive an entire offence on his own and seemed to help will the Americans into the semi-finals at the Worlds over a much better Swedish team.
Risk: N/A Reward: 5/5
3. Dylan Strome 6'3" 185 C Erie Otters (OHL) G: 45 A: 84 PTS: 129 NHL Comparable: Joe Thornton ISS Rank: 3 CSS Rank: 4 THN Rank: 4
Wolfie Says: Strome is going to be a franchise centre. His vision on the ice with puck is second only to McDavid in the whole draft. He makes passes that few in the NHL could make. Off the ice, he’s lauded by teammates and management as a leader and a rink rat always striving to improve. His only drawback is that, for a top NHL prospect, he’s an average skater.
Jays Says: Scouts have focused on Strome’s non-elite skating, but I don’t believe that it will hold him back from being a first-line pivot at the NHL level. His hockey sense, offensive awareness, and puck protection skills are at a pro-calibre level already. He has the type of play-making ability that could see him annually challenge for assist titles, and he’s got elite size already. Could use some filling out physically, but he possesses a tremendous attitude and will work hard to make it happen.
Risk: 1/5 Reward: 5/5
4. Noah Hanifin 6'3" 203 D Boston College Eagles (HE) G: 5 A: 18 PTS: 23 NHL Comparable: Larry Murphy ISS Rank: 4 CSS Rank: 3 THN Rank: 3
Jays Says: A smooth-skating rearguard with superb puck-handling skills that likes to move the puck up ice on his own. Was an offensive catalyst on an elite NCAA club by the time he was barely eighteen and possesses huge point-producing upside. If there is a downside, it’s that Hanifin doesn’t use his size to his advantage as much as a 6’3 defender should and his decision-making skills could use improvement without the puck. With elite offensive skills, hockey sense, and advanced development at a young age, Noah could challenge for future Norris trophies.
Wolfie Says: Hanifin is going to eat minutes and put up points at the NHL level. Of the big three defensemen at the top of this draft, he’s the most prone to rushing the puck and generating offence with his skating. Uses his reach to his advantage defensively to close gaps and regain possession. Prone to taking dangerous offensive risks.
Risk: 1.5 Reward: 5/5
5. Mitch Marner 5'11" 160 C/RW London Knights (OHL) G: 44 A: 82 PTS: 126 NHL Comparable: Paul Kariya ISS Rank: 6 CSS Rank: 6 THN Rank: 5
Wolfie Says: Marner is an electric skater who loves pushing the pace of the game. He can do everything at top speed, making him one of the most exciting players in the draft to watch. There’s a lot of talent there but concerns about his size aren’t unfounded. Marner took a beating against Erie and it knocked him out of the playoffs.
Jays Says: The most pure natural offensive talent in the draft outside of McDavid, Marner is an incredibly skilled talent with elite speed and puck-handling skills. Size is a concern with him, but on a pure skill level, there are few prospects around who are comparable. He makes those around him better and posted one of the greatest PPG averages by a draft eligible prospect ever. It will be interesting to see if he is developed as a winger or centre in the NHL.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 5/5
6. Ivan Provorov 6'1" 201 D Brandon Wheat Kings (WHL) G: 15 A: 46 PTS: 61 NHL Comparable: Slava Fetisov ISS Rank: 7 CSS Rank: 7 THN Rank: 6
Jays Says: A gifted on-ice general that can run the point on the power play, play key minutes at even-strength, or down a man. Provorov can do it all. He doesn’t have the nastiness that teams often look for in a number one defender, but his positional play has improved to the point that he could be the best all-around defenceman amongst this year’s crop. He needs to work on his gap control and handling bigger forwards off the rush, but only Hanifin has a higher ceiling.
Wolfie Says: If you’re looking for a soldier on defence, Provorov is it. He could prove to be the best defenseman in the Draft. He doesn’t have Hanifin’s offensive upside, but unlike Hanifin, Provorov will step up and take your head off if the situation presents. In the NHL, he’ll play all situations and eat minutes.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 4.5/5
7. Zach Werenski 6'2" 206 D Michigan Wolverines (Big 10) G: 9 A: 16 PTS: 25 NHL Comparable: Ryan Suter ISS Rank: 11 CSS Rank: 9 THN Rank: 9
Wolfie Says: Of the three defenders at the top of the Draft, Werenski makes the best decisions with the puck. Most scouts, however, say that his skating is his strongest attribute. He’ll become a player who plays in all situations. He’ll never put up the points Hanifin does, but it wouldn’t shock me to see Werenski become more of a minute horse than Hanifin at the next level.
Jays Says: Werenski is probably the “safest” pick out of the top three defenders this year, but that doesn’t mean he has a low ceiling. His decision-making ability is top-notch and he demonstrates excellent defensive acumen for a player his age. With good skating, puck-handling, and passing skills, he promises to be a top-pairing defender for a long time. It remains to be seen just how good offensively he will be as a professional, however, as he lacks the assertiveness of Hanifin or Provorov in the other team’s zone.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 4/5
8. Mikko Rantanen 6"4" 211 RW/C TPS (SM-Liga) G: 9 A: 19 PTS: 28 NHL Comparable: Marian Hossa ISS Rank: 9 CSS Rank: 1 (EU) THN Rank: 12
Jays Says: Certainly the best European talent available in a draft somewhat lacking in high-end talent from across the pond. Already possesses the size that has NHL scouts drooling, but he has the stick-handling ability and hockey IQ that high-scoring forwards require to be an impact player as NHLers. He doesn't have elite speed, but with his size and ability to handle the puck, it’s not a huge concern. Like many Finns, Mikko is a very strong two-way player who works hard without the puck and can be counted on defensively.
Wolfie Says: Might be the best 200-foot player in the draft with a dazzling set of hands to boot and high level hockey sense. His shot, considered a weakness coming into the season has made a marked improvement to the point where it’s now a strength, he just needs to use it more. His skating is a mixed bag. Great edges, efficient stride but needs a better first step.
Risk: 2.5/5 Reward: 4.5/5
9. Mathew Barzal 5'11" 175 C Seattle Thunderbirds (WHL) G: 12 A: 45 PTS: 57 NHL Comparable: Marc Savard ISS Rank: 8 CSS Rank: 11 THN Rank: 10
Wolfie Says: A fantastic playmaker who always seems to make the right decision with the puck on his stick. Elite level vision and hockey sense paired with great skating make him a player that could develop into strong offensive centre in the NHL. Needs more upper body strength.
Jays Says: Pure passing centre that loves to hang on to the puck and generate plays. Barzal really does make those around him better. He has the talent level to be a first-line centre in the NHL, but probably profiles more as a second option guy due to his more limited scoring ability and size limitations, as he doesn’t have the evasiveness of a player like Marner. He also needs to learn to make decisions with the puck more quickly at the NHL level, where things move faster.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 4.5/5
10. Lawson Crouse 6'4" 215 LW Kingston Frontenacs (OHL) G: 29 A: 22 PTS: 51 NHL Comparable: Rick Nash ISS Rank: 4 CSS Rank: 5 THN Rank: 8
Jays Says: A prospect who old school scouts will adore and modern talent evaluators abhor, Crouse has probably been scrutinized more than anyone not named McDavid. On the one hand, he’s a productive goal-scorer and has superb pro-level size and skating ability. He’s strong on the boards and aggressive along the wall, and in front of the net. On the other hand, he’s very limited at creating plays himself and needs to play with a line-mate that can feed him the puck.
Wolfie Says: He might be the most controversial player in the Draft. He’s a very strong skater with speed and size. He also happens to hit like a freight train. He’s got a good shot and goes to the net. So, why doesn’t he score more? He’s not a creative player. If he plays with an offensive centre though…
Risk: 4/5 Reward: 4.5/5
11. Timo Meier 6'1" 209 RW Halifax Mooseheads (QMJHL) G: 44 A: 46 PTS: 90 NHL Comparable: Tony Amonte ISS Rank: 13 CSS Rank: 10 THN Rank: 13
Wolfie Says: Meier is the player who has probably seen his draft stock rise the fastest over the season. His strength on the puck is outstanding and he can shoot from full stride. His best attribute is that shot. This kid has 30 goal scorer written all over him.
Jays Says: The type of versatile, all-around threat that you can trust to play well in any role or situation. Meier is willing to get involved physically, plays hard on both sides of the puck, and also has one of the best shots in the draft. He can either drive a line or be the mucker in the corners depending on his role and line-mates. May be a bit of a “tweener” in the NHL, but if he can find a role and stick to it, he will be a valuable asset to a club.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 4/5
12. Travis Konecny 5'10" 175 C Ottawa 67s (OHL) G: 29 A: 39 PTS: 68 NHL Comparable: Pat Verbeek ISS Rank: 12 CSS Rank: 14 THN Rank: 24
Jays Says: Another pass-first with size limitations, Konecny doesn’t have the pure skill level of a Barzal or Merkley, but he is a superior goal-scorer and far more effective from a physical standpoint due to his willingness to go to the undesirable areas. Already a captain for the 67s at seventeen, Travis has the leadership ability and character element in spades, but also the talent and hockey IQ to be a top two centre as a professional.
Wolfie Says: Konecny is all heart. Scouts call him ‘a lion’ and no one believes he’s only 5’10” after they watch him play. On an even slightly better team, he’s a 90 point player this season. He goes into the dirty areas, doesn’t give up on pucks and has the hands and skill to play with skill players.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 4/5
13. Evgeny Svechnikov 6'3" 205 LW Cape Breton Screaming Eagles (QMJHL) G: 32 A: 46 PTS: 78 NHL Comparable: Bobby Ryan ISS Rank:18 CSS Rank: 17 THN Rank: 16
Wolfie Says: His most powerful offensive weapon is his shot. He’s got the hands to beat defenders one-on-one and likes doing it, but his bread and butter as a pro will be his release. His size and balance makes him hard to knock off pucks.
Jays Says: Evgeny is a superb natural scorer with size and a wide body. He has the offensive instincts and elite skating skills to be a huge point producer, and is capable of carrying his team for periods on natural ability alone. He is a work in progress defensively, but with his speed and size, there is the potential for him to be a deadly asset on the penalty kill if used correctly.
Risk: 3.5/5 Reward: 4.5/5
14. Nick Merkley 5'11" 191 C/RW Kelowna Rockets (WHL) G: 20 A: 70 PTS: 90 NHL Comparable: Chris Drury ISS Rank: 19 CSS Rank: 23 THN Rank: 15
Jays Says: There’s a lot to like about Merkley for both old and new school scouts: his production as a draft eligible ranks amongst the best in his class, but he also has the evasiveness and shiftiness to negate concerns about his average size at the next level. An excellent passer that can generate offensive chances from seemingly nowhere, Nick has the talent and vision to be a top two centre in the NHL.
Wolfie Says: Merkley is smart on both sides of the puck and knows the efficient way to make plays in traffic. For his size, he’s strong on the puck and tough to push around. This makes up for an awkward skating stride. One of the best passers in the draft.
Risk: 1.5/5 Reward: 3.5/5
15. Kyle Connor 6'1" 177 LW Youngstown Phantoms (USHL) G: 32 A: 45 PTS: 77 NHL Comparable: Pierre Turgeon ISS Rank: 13 CSS Rank: 13 THN Rank: 11
Jays Says: Already committed to a superb development program at the University of Michigan next season, Connor is as toolsy as any player in this year’s draft. Has excellent speed, uses his edges well, and is a top-level skater, which makes him a threat in all three zones. An excellent stick-handler that produced at every level he played at, Connor will need to get stronger and commit to improving his defensive play to continue developing as a top prospect.
Wolfie Says: Kyle Connor is unlikely to ever lead his team in scoring, but he has all the tools to play on an offensive line for his entire career and make the players around him better. Connor’s hands and his ability to control the puck down low will make him a great possession player at the next level.
Risk: 1.5/5 Reward: 3.5/5
16. Jansen Harkins 6'1" 182 C Prince George Cougars (WHL) G: 20 A: 59 PTS: 79 NHL Comparable: Steve Rucchin ISS Rank: 25 CSS Rank: 15 THN Rank: 21
Wolfie Says: Jansen Harkins is going to be a Swiss Army knife at the next level, both because of his ability to play wing or centre and because of his high compete level. He’s a player whose hockey sense will allow him to play up and down your line up and in any situation. All of which make up for a lacklustre skating stride
Jays Says: Intelligent, versatile player with the ability to play in multiple circumstances. Not the most naturally-gifted player in the draft, but a hard worker that produced points and made his line-mates better due to his industrious work ethic and willingness to battle in the corners. Harkins is the type of player that traditional scouts love due to his commitment level and hockey bloodlines: his father Todd was a former Calgary Flame.
Risk: 1/5 Reward: 3.5/5
17. Thomas Chabot 6'2" 179 D Saint John Sea Dogs (QMJHL) G: 12 A: 29 PTS: 41 NHL Comparable: Francois Beauchemin ISS Rank: 16 CSS Rank: 16 THN Rank: 23
Jays Says: Chabot is a jack of all trades defender that can be relied upon in any situation because of his calm demeanour and reliability. He handles the puck well and has a quality pro-level shot that he utilized to the tune of 12 goals last season. With his smooth skating ability and outlet passing, he is the type of mobile defender that NHL teams covet nowadays.
Wolfie Says: At the start of the year, Chabot was just a slick skating offensive defenseman. It wasn’t until Jakub Zboril went down with an injury that Chabot proved he could play big minutes in key defensive situations. He’ll put up points as a pro but won’t be an offensive defenseman with big numbers.
Risk: 1/5 Reward: 3.5/5
18. Noah Juulsen 6'2" 180 D Everett Silvertips (WHL) G: 9 A: 43 PTS: 52 NHL Comparable: Kevin Bieksa ISS Rank: 29 CSS: 22 THN Rank: 33
Wolfie Says: I’m high on Juulsen because I don’t see a lot of flaws in his game. He’s got a great shot, makes good decisions with the puck and plays a ton of minutes in all situations. Juulsen has one of the highest compete levels in the whole draft. Some scouts don’t think his offence will translate, but I think his shot will get him a place on an NHL powerplay.
Jays Says: The type of blueliner that NHL clubs value in the post-season because of his competitiveness and willingness to absorb physical punishment, Juulsen was made for the grind of the playoffs. A quality offensive player with vision and the ability to pass the puck, Juulsen is a good skater that likes to create chances. While he doesn’t have the greatest speed, and can be prone to the occasional gaffe with the puck, he promises to be a quality top four rearguard.
Risk: 2.5/5 Reward: 4/5
19. Daniel Sprong 6'0" 192 RW Charlottetown Islanders (QMJHL) G: 39 A: 49 PTS: 88 NHL Comparable: Jordan Eberle ISS Rank: 25 CSS Rank: 20 THN Rank: 25
Jays Says: One of my favourite prospects on pure skill level alone, if Sprong develops a greater consistency to his game he could be one of the impact players of the draft. He does everything offensively at a high-end level and is one of the best pure goal-scorers available. I think that with his speed and ability to read the play, he will definitely be an NHLer in some capacity. It’s all about developing a greater reliability from game to game.
Wolfie Says: Fantastic hands, great top speed and the ability to beat the defenders with either. The biggest knock on him is that he doesn’t show up every night and that’s fair. With all that talent, you’d love to see a higher compete level. If he ends up in the right situation, he could be a dangerous NHLer.
Risk: 2.5/5 Reward: 4/5
20. Pavel Zacha 6'3" 210 C/RW Sarnia Sting (OHL) G: 16 A: 18 PTS: 34 NHL Comparable: Martin Havlat ISS Rank: 10 CSS Rank: 8 ISS Rank: 7
Wolfie Says: What Zacha does well, he does really well. His skating, puckhandling and willingness to engage are all top notch. But he just makes so many stupid decisions and that’s the reason more scouts think he’ll be winger than a centre as a pro. His lack of hockey sense and tendency to play a high risk physical game have cause him to slide for me
Jays Says: Pavel has the type of size and innate talent that NHL scouts love. So why is he ranked so low on our list compared to most scouting bureaus? To be brief: hockey sense. All the talent in the world is for naught if one doesn’t know how to use it. Zacha can be maddeningly frustrating to watch at times, as he is capable of a magical play one moment, and then a boneheaded decision the next. On pure skill level alone he is a potential top five talent, but there are limitations here. If he can figure out how to use his tools more consistently, he could be a star.
Risk: 4.5/5 Reward: 4.5/5
21. Oliver Kylington 6'0" 180 D Farjestad (SHL) G: 2 A: 3 PTS: 5 NHL Comparable: Trevor Daley ISS Rank: 32 CSS Rank: 6 (EU) THN Rank: 20
Jays Says: The best European-developed defender available, few players have watched their draft stock fall as much as Kylington’s in the second-half. He has the type of offensive skill that NHL teams look for in a future power play general, but inconsistency and injury woes have called to question some of his physical limitations. He does not have ideal size for an NHL top-pairing blueliner and will need to develop greater consistency if he is to reach his potential. With his skating and offensive instincts, he could be a stud point producer one day.
Wolfie Says: Kylington started the season as a Top Ten player. A combination of injuries and poor play has kept him from remaining as one. Kylington is a bit of a rover with a package of pure offensive tools. He is an absolutely elite skater with a great shot and solid passing ability. He’ll need to work to become more than just a powerplay specialist but he has the tools.
Risk: 4/5 Reward: 4/5
22. Ryan Pilon 6'2" 206 D Brandon Wheat Kings (WHL) G: 11 A: 41 PTS: 52 NHL Comparable: Bryan McCabe ISS Rank: 45 CSS Rank: 24 THN Rank: 100
Wolfie Says: No defensive prospect in the Draft encourages more debate than Pilon. He possesses the best shot from the point in the whole draft and he knows how to run a powerplay. His skating will be average for a pro. He had an ‘attitude’ label hung on him after demanding a trade out of Lethbridge. But he really stepped up for Brandon this year physically when he was needed.
Jays Says: Had a standout season offensively this season compared to his preceding ones, and demonstrated unknown power play aptitude for a dominant Brandon club. Pilon is an aggressive two-way defender that can log huge minutes and play in any situation. He also has a fantastic point shot that he is learning to get on net more consistently, but there are concerns about his skating and attitude that have not dissipated.
Risk: 3/5 Reward: 4/5
23. Paul Bittner 6'4" 204 LW Portland Winterhawks (WHL) G: 34 A: 37 PTS: 71 NHL Comparable: Todd Bertuzzi ISS Rank: 17 CSS Rank: 26 THN Rank: 17
Jays Says: Physical specimen with a natural release and goal-scoring ability in spades. Was a key component of one of the WHL’s most dominant power plays last year, and is virtually impossible to move when planted in front of the net. Unfortunately, he can demonstrate an indifferent attitude at times and is limited as a play-maker, which will limit his offensive ceiling.
Wolfie Says: A lot of scouts expected more from Bittner at the end of the season playing with Nic Petan and Oliver Bjorkstrand. At his best, he’s a rugged, big body power forward who can bully his way to the net. He’s also got a goal scorer’s release. Has a tendency to wait for the play rather than trying to force things to happen. Needs to play harder.
Risk: 3/5 Reward: 4/5
24. Joel Ek-Eriksson 6’2” 185 C Farjestad (SHL) G: 4 A: 2 PTS: 6 NHL Comparable: Ryan Kesler ISS Rank: 20 CSS Rank: 4 (EU) THN Rank: 27
Wolfie Says: Probably the best 200 foot centre in the whole draft. His defensive acumen draws rave reviews from scouts but he’s also shown a great scoring touch, particularly in close to the net. His skating is above average and the instincts with the puck that have made him a great defensive player showed up offensively at the end of the season. Showed great hands at the Under-18s.
Jays Says: Committed two-way pivot that works hard with or without the puck. Has a quality frame with big shoulders and demonstrates excellent puck protection ability. Starting to put it together offensively and gaining more confidence as a goal-scorer, after being limited to more of a play-making role at the start of the season. Has the type of hockey IQ and on-ice awareness that, with his size and attitude, virtually assure him of an NHL roster spot somewhere soon.
Risk: 2.5/5 Reward: 4/5
25. Jeremy Bracco 5'9" 173 RW USNTDP G: 26 A: 49 PTS: 75 NHL Comparable: Daniel Briere ISS Rank: 28 CSS Rank: 60 THN Rank: 100
Jays Says: One of the highest upside players available, Bracco does so many things well. He is incredibly exciting to watch because of his innate creativity and love of handling the puck, but he demonstrates a goal scorer’s release and is a quality finisher when he chooses to be. His size is a tremendous concern, as he is very weak and easy to knock off the puck, but if he puts it all together he could be one of the steals of the draft.
Wolfie Says: A magician’s set of hands and a quick pair of feet makes him a dangerous and elusive offensive talent. His release should lend itself to scoring more goals but he opts to be a pass-first playmaker. He doesn’t shy away from traffic. He needs to get stronger to handle playing in tight to the net at the next level.
Risk: 4.5/5 Reward: 4.5/5
Edit: this list is continued in the second post of the thread due to text limitations.
A few things to take into consideration when using these rankings as a guide, however: (1) Our rankings are often reflective of a compromise between the two of us. We form these rankings together and therefore differ on placement. The final rankings often reflect this compromise, and sometimes a player one of us likes more than the other is listed in a place in exchange for a higher or lower placement of a different player later on in the rankings. (2) Our risk/reward section is based on draft placement as well. The higher or lower that a player is ranked on a list affects how we judge their risk factor. Everything is relative. There is a lot less risk in attempting a home run selection on a player with a lot of potential but a high bust probability in the third or fourth round, rather than in the first. (3) This list is by no means authoritative. I have deferred to Irish on players that he has seen more than myself, or read more about, and in turn he has deferred to a few players that I consider personal favourites. This ties into the first note regarding compromise. Our NHL player comparisons, notably, should not be taken as a direct comparison or a projection, but merely a stylistic comparison. For instance, in comparing Jack Eichel to Mike Modano, we are only suggesting that there are similarities in their size, position, creativity, and Eichel's potential as a future franchise player. By no means does it indicate that he will become a future first-ballot Hall of Famer.
With that in mind, here are our official 2015 Top 50 Draft Eligible Rankings:
1. Connor McDavid 6'1" 195 C Erie Otters (OHL) G: 44 A: 76 PTS: 120 NHL Comparable: Does Not Exist ISS Rank: 1 CSS Rank: 1 THN Rank: 1
Wolfie Says: What can be said about Connor McDavid that hasn’t been said already? He may be the best player to enter the league since Mario. You’re getting a total elite skill package with this player.
Jays Says: The phrase generational talent gets thrown around far too often these days, but with McDavid, it’s an apt description. Connor possesses phenomenal offensive instincts and skating ability, with the ability to handle the puck at top speed, and finish plays at will. He can beat defenders in a myriad of ways, using both craftiness, and a bit of edge to drive the net. He can pass, shoot, finish, and has tremendous leadership characteristics. In short, McDavid is a future franchise pillar to whoever drafts him. He has the talent to be an all-time great.
Risk: N/A Reward: 5/5
2. Jack Eichel 6'2" 196 C Boston University Terriers (HE) G: 24 A: 43 PTS: 67 NHL Comparable: Mike Modano ISS Rank: 2 CSS Rank: 2 THN Rank: 2
Jays Says: The type of franchise player that would go first overall in virtually any other draft. Is recognized for his fantastic play-making skills, but is an equally talented goal-scorer with a deceptive shot and natural finishing ability. Changes gears with ease and is an excellent skater. Has the type of creativity that will make him a mainstay on highlight reels for years to come.
Wolfie Says: Eichel has a phenomenal set of hands to go with a great skating stride. He’s going to score a lot of goals in the NHL off the rush. He can drive an entire offence on his own and seemed to help will the Americans into the semi-finals at the Worlds over a much better Swedish team.
Risk: N/A Reward: 5/5
3. Dylan Strome 6'3" 185 C Erie Otters (OHL) G: 45 A: 84 PTS: 129 NHL Comparable: Joe Thornton ISS Rank: 3 CSS Rank: 4 THN Rank: 4
Wolfie Says: Strome is going to be a franchise centre. His vision on the ice with puck is second only to McDavid in the whole draft. He makes passes that few in the NHL could make. Off the ice, he’s lauded by teammates and management as a leader and a rink rat always striving to improve. His only drawback is that, for a top NHL prospect, he’s an average skater.
Jays Says: Scouts have focused on Strome’s non-elite skating, but I don’t believe that it will hold him back from being a first-line pivot at the NHL level. His hockey sense, offensive awareness, and puck protection skills are at a pro-calibre level already. He has the type of play-making ability that could see him annually challenge for assist titles, and he’s got elite size already. Could use some filling out physically, but he possesses a tremendous attitude and will work hard to make it happen.
Risk: 1/5 Reward: 5/5
4. Noah Hanifin 6'3" 203 D Boston College Eagles (HE) G: 5 A: 18 PTS: 23 NHL Comparable: Larry Murphy ISS Rank: 4 CSS Rank: 3 THN Rank: 3
Jays Says: A smooth-skating rearguard with superb puck-handling skills that likes to move the puck up ice on his own. Was an offensive catalyst on an elite NCAA club by the time he was barely eighteen and possesses huge point-producing upside. If there is a downside, it’s that Hanifin doesn’t use his size to his advantage as much as a 6’3 defender should and his decision-making skills could use improvement without the puck. With elite offensive skills, hockey sense, and advanced development at a young age, Noah could challenge for future Norris trophies.
Wolfie Says: Hanifin is going to eat minutes and put up points at the NHL level. Of the big three defensemen at the top of this draft, he’s the most prone to rushing the puck and generating offence with his skating. Uses his reach to his advantage defensively to close gaps and regain possession. Prone to taking dangerous offensive risks.
Risk: 1.5 Reward: 5/5
5. Mitch Marner 5'11" 160 C/RW London Knights (OHL) G: 44 A: 82 PTS: 126 NHL Comparable: Paul Kariya ISS Rank: 6 CSS Rank: 6 THN Rank: 5
Wolfie Says: Marner is an electric skater who loves pushing the pace of the game. He can do everything at top speed, making him one of the most exciting players in the draft to watch. There’s a lot of talent there but concerns about his size aren’t unfounded. Marner took a beating against Erie and it knocked him out of the playoffs.
Jays Says: The most pure natural offensive talent in the draft outside of McDavid, Marner is an incredibly skilled talent with elite speed and puck-handling skills. Size is a concern with him, but on a pure skill level, there are few prospects around who are comparable. He makes those around him better and posted one of the greatest PPG averages by a draft eligible prospect ever. It will be interesting to see if he is developed as a winger or centre in the NHL.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 5/5
6. Ivan Provorov 6'1" 201 D Brandon Wheat Kings (WHL) G: 15 A: 46 PTS: 61 NHL Comparable: Slava Fetisov ISS Rank: 7 CSS Rank: 7 THN Rank: 6
Jays Says: A gifted on-ice general that can run the point on the power play, play key minutes at even-strength, or down a man. Provorov can do it all. He doesn’t have the nastiness that teams often look for in a number one defender, but his positional play has improved to the point that he could be the best all-around defenceman amongst this year’s crop. He needs to work on his gap control and handling bigger forwards off the rush, but only Hanifin has a higher ceiling.
Wolfie Says: If you’re looking for a soldier on defence, Provorov is it. He could prove to be the best defenseman in the Draft. He doesn’t have Hanifin’s offensive upside, but unlike Hanifin, Provorov will step up and take your head off if the situation presents. In the NHL, he’ll play all situations and eat minutes.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 4.5/5
7. Zach Werenski 6'2" 206 D Michigan Wolverines (Big 10) G: 9 A: 16 PTS: 25 NHL Comparable: Ryan Suter ISS Rank: 11 CSS Rank: 9 THN Rank: 9
Wolfie Says: Of the three defenders at the top of the Draft, Werenski makes the best decisions with the puck. Most scouts, however, say that his skating is his strongest attribute. He’ll become a player who plays in all situations. He’ll never put up the points Hanifin does, but it wouldn’t shock me to see Werenski become more of a minute horse than Hanifin at the next level.
Jays Says: Werenski is probably the “safest” pick out of the top three defenders this year, but that doesn’t mean he has a low ceiling. His decision-making ability is top-notch and he demonstrates excellent defensive acumen for a player his age. With good skating, puck-handling, and passing skills, he promises to be a top-pairing defender for a long time. It remains to be seen just how good offensively he will be as a professional, however, as he lacks the assertiveness of Hanifin or Provorov in the other team’s zone.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 4/5
8. Mikko Rantanen 6"4" 211 RW/C TPS (SM-Liga) G: 9 A: 19 PTS: 28 NHL Comparable: Marian Hossa ISS Rank: 9 CSS Rank: 1 (EU) THN Rank: 12
Jays Says: Certainly the best European talent available in a draft somewhat lacking in high-end talent from across the pond. Already possesses the size that has NHL scouts drooling, but he has the stick-handling ability and hockey IQ that high-scoring forwards require to be an impact player as NHLers. He doesn't have elite speed, but with his size and ability to handle the puck, it’s not a huge concern. Like many Finns, Mikko is a very strong two-way player who works hard without the puck and can be counted on defensively.
Wolfie Says: Might be the best 200-foot player in the draft with a dazzling set of hands to boot and high level hockey sense. His shot, considered a weakness coming into the season has made a marked improvement to the point where it’s now a strength, he just needs to use it more. His skating is a mixed bag. Great edges, efficient stride but needs a better first step.
Risk: 2.5/5 Reward: 4.5/5
9. Mathew Barzal 5'11" 175 C Seattle Thunderbirds (WHL) G: 12 A: 45 PTS: 57 NHL Comparable: Marc Savard ISS Rank: 8 CSS Rank: 11 THN Rank: 10
Wolfie Says: A fantastic playmaker who always seems to make the right decision with the puck on his stick. Elite level vision and hockey sense paired with great skating make him a player that could develop into strong offensive centre in the NHL. Needs more upper body strength.
Jays Says: Pure passing centre that loves to hang on to the puck and generate plays. Barzal really does make those around him better. He has the talent level to be a first-line centre in the NHL, but probably profiles more as a second option guy due to his more limited scoring ability and size limitations, as he doesn’t have the evasiveness of a player like Marner. He also needs to learn to make decisions with the puck more quickly at the NHL level, where things move faster.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 4.5/5
10. Lawson Crouse 6'4" 215 LW Kingston Frontenacs (OHL) G: 29 A: 22 PTS: 51 NHL Comparable: Rick Nash ISS Rank: 4 CSS Rank: 5 THN Rank: 8
Jays Says: A prospect who old school scouts will adore and modern talent evaluators abhor, Crouse has probably been scrutinized more than anyone not named McDavid. On the one hand, he’s a productive goal-scorer and has superb pro-level size and skating ability. He’s strong on the boards and aggressive along the wall, and in front of the net. On the other hand, he’s very limited at creating plays himself and needs to play with a line-mate that can feed him the puck.
Wolfie Says: He might be the most controversial player in the Draft. He’s a very strong skater with speed and size. He also happens to hit like a freight train. He’s got a good shot and goes to the net. So, why doesn’t he score more? He’s not a creative player. If he plays with an offensive centre though…
Risk: 4/5 Reward: 4.5/5
11. Timo Meier 6'1" 209 RW Halifax Mooseheads (QMJHL) G: 44 A: 46 PTS: 90 NHL Comparable: Tony Amonte ISS Rank: 13 CSS Rank: 10 THN Rank: 13
Wolfie Says: Meier is the player who has probably seen his draft stock rise the fastest over the season. His strength on the puck is outstanding and he can shoot from full stride. His best attribute is that shot. This kid has 30 goal scorer written all over him.
Jays Says: The type of versatile, all-around threat that you can trust to play well in any role or situation. Meier is willing to get involved physically, plays hard on both sides of the puck, and also has one of the best shots in the draft. He can either drive a line or be the mucker in the corners depending on his role and line-mates. May be a bit of a “tweener” in the NHL, but if he can find a role and stick to it, he will be a valuable asset to a club.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 4/5
12. Travis Konecny 5'10" 175 C Ottawa 67s (OHL) G: 29 A: 39 PTS: 68 NHL Comparable: Pat Verbeek ISS Rank: 12 CSS Rank: 14 THN Rank: 24
Jays Says: Another pass-first with size limitations, Konecny doesn’t have the pure skill level of a Barzal or Merkley, but he is a superior goal-scorer and far more effective from a physical standpoint due to his willingness to go to the undesirable areas. Already a captain for the 67s at seventeen, Travis has the leadership ability and character element in spades, but also the talent and hockey IQ to be a top two centre as a professional.
Wolfie Says: Konecny is all heart. Scouts call him ‘a lion’ and no one believes he’s only 5’10” after they watch him play. On an even slightly better team, he’s a 90 point player this season. He goes into the dirty areas, doesn’t give up on pucks and has the hands and skill to play with skill players.
Risk: 2/5 Reward: 4/5
13. Evgeny Svechnikov 6'3" 205 LW Cape Breton Screaming Eagles (QMJHL) G: 32 A: 46 PTS: 78 NHL Comparable: Bobby Ryan ISS Rank:18 CSS Rank: 17 THN Rank: 16
Wolfie Says: His most powerful offensive weapon is his shot. He’s got the hands to beat defenders one-on-one and likes doing it, but his bread and butter as a pro will be his release. His size and balance makes him hard to knock off pucks.
Jays Says: Evgeny is a superb natural scorer with size and a wide body. He has the offensive instincts and elite skating skills to be a huge point producer, and is capable of carrying his team for periods on natural ability alone. He is a work in progress defensively, but with his speed and size, there is the potential for him to be a deadly asset on the penalty kill if used correctly.
Risk: 3.5/5 Reward: 4.5/5
14. Nick Merkley 5'11" 191 C/RW Kelowna Rockets (WHL) G: 20 A: 70 PTS: 90 NHL Comparable: Chris Drury ISS Rank: 19 CSS Rank: 23 THN Rank: 15
Jays Says: There’s a lot to like about Merkley for both old and new school scouts: his production as a draft eligible ranks amongst the best in his class, but he also has the evasiveness and shiftiness to negate concerns about his average size at the next level. An excellent passer that can generate offensive chances from seemingly nowhere, Nick has the talent and vision to be a top two centre in the NHL.
Wolfie Says: Merkley is smart on both sides of the puck and knows the efficient way to make plays in traffic. For his size, he’s strong on the puck and tough to push around. This makes up for an awkward skating stride. One of the best passers in the draft.
Risk: 1.5/5 Reward: 3.5/5
15. Kyle Connor 6'1" 177 LW Youngstown Phantoms (USHL) G: 32 A: 45 PTS: 77 NHL Comparable: Pierre Turgeon ISS Rank: 13 CSS Rank: 13 THN Rank: 11
Jays Says: Already committed to a superb development program at the University of Michigan next season, Connor is as toolsy as any player in this year’s draft. Has excellent speed, uses his edges well, and is a top-level skater, which makes him a threat in all three zones. An excellent stick-handler that produced at every level he played at, Connor will need to get stronger and commit to improving his defensive play to continue developing as a top prospect.
Wolfie Says: Kyle Connor is unlikely to ever lead his team in scoring, but he has all the tools to play on an offensive line for his entire career and make the players around him better. Connor’s hands and his ability to control the puck down low will make him a great possession player at the next level.
Risk: 1.5/5 Reward: 3.5/5
16. Jansen Harkins 6'1" 182 C Prince George Cougars (WHL) G: 20 A: 59 PTS: 79 NHL Comparable: Steve Rucchin ISS Rank: 25 CSS Rank: 15 THN Rank: 21
Wolfie Says: Jansen Harkins is going to be a Swiss Army knife at the next level, both because of his ability to play wing or centre and because of his high compete level. He’s a player whose hockey sense will allow him to play up and down your line up and in any situation. All of which make up for a lacklustre skating stride
Jays Says: Intelligent, versatile player with the ability to play in multiple circumstances. Not the most naturally-gifted player in the draft, but a hard worker that produced points and made his line-mates better due to his industrious work ethic and willingness to battle in the corners. Harkins is the type of player that traditional scouts love due to his commitment level and hockey bloodlines: his father Todd was a former Calgary Flame.
Risk: 1/5 Reward: 3.5/5
17. Thomas Chabot 6'2" 179 D Saint John Sea Dogs (QMJHL) G: 12 A: 29 PTS: 41 NHL Comparable: Francois Beauchemin ISS Rank: 16 CSS Rank: 16 THN Rank: 23
Jays Says: Chabot is a jack of all trades defender that can be relied upon in any situation because of his calm demeanour and reliability. He handles the puck well and has a quality pro-level shot that he utilized to the tune of 12 goals last season. With his smooth skating ability and outlet passing, he is the type of mobile defender that NHL teams covet nowadays.
Wolfie Says: At the start of the year, Chabot was just a slick skating offensive defenseman. It wasn’t until Jakub Zboril went down with an injury that Chabot proved he could play big minutes in key defensive situations. He’ll put up points as a pro but won’t be an offensive defenseman with big numbers.
Risk: 1/5 Reward: 3.5/5
18. Noah Juulsen 6'2" 180 D Everett Silvertips (WHL) G: 9 A: 43 PTS: 52 NHL Comparable: Kevin Bieksa ISS Rank: 29 CSS: 22 THN Rank: 33
Wolfie Says: I’m high on Juulsen because I don’t see a lot of flaws in his game. He’s got a great shot, makes good decisions with the puck and plays a ton of minutes in all situations. Juulsen has one of the highest compete levels in the whole draft. Some scouts don’t think his offence will translate, but I think his shot will get him a place on an NHL powerplay.
Jays Says: The type of blueliner that NHL clubs value in the post-season because of his competitiveness and willingness to absorb physical punishment, Juulsen was made for the grind of the playoffs. A quality offensive player with vision and the ability to pass the puck, Juulsen is a good skater that likes to create chances. While he doesn’t have the greatest speed, and can be prone to the occasional gaffe with the puck, he promises to be a quality top four rearguard.
Risk: 2.5/5 Reward: 4/5
19. Daniel Sprong 6'0" 192 RW Charlottetown Islanders (QMJHL) G: 39 A: 49 PTS: 88 NHL Comparable: Jordan Eberle ISS Rank: 25 CSS Rank: 20 THN Rank: 25
Jays Says: One of my favourite prospects on pure skill level alone, if Sprong develops a greater consistency to his game he could be one of the impact players of the draft. He does everything offensively at a high-end level and is one of the best pure goal-scorers available. I think that with his speed and ability to read the play, he will definitely be an NHLer in some capacity. It’s all about developing a greater reliability from game to game.
Wolfie Says: Fantastic hands, great top speed and the ability to beat the defenders with either. The biggest knock on him is that he doesn’t show up every night and that’s fair. With all that talent, you’d love to see a higher compete level. If he ends up in the right situation, he could be a dangerous NHLer.
Risk: 2.5/5 Reward: 4/5
20. Pavel Zacha 6'3" 210 C/RW Sarnia Sting (OHL) G: 16 A: 18 PTS: 34 NHL Comparable: Martin Havlat ISS Rank: 10 CSS Rank: 8 ISS Rank: 7
Wolfie Says: What Zacha does well, he does really well. His skating, puckhandling and willingness to engage are all top notch. But he just makes so many stupid decisions and that’s the reason more scouts think he’ll be winger than a centre as a pro. His lack of hockey sense and tendency to play a high risk physical game have cause him to slide for me
Jays Says: Pavel has the type of size and innate talent that NHL scouts love. So why is he ranked so low on our list compared to most scouting bureaus? To be brief: hockey sense. All the talent in the world is for naught if one doesn’t know how to use it. Zacha can be maddeningly frustrating to watch at times, as he is capable of a magical play one moment, and then a boneheaded decision the next. On pure skill level alone he is a potential top five talent, but there are limitations here. If he can figure out how to use his tools more consistently, he could be a star.
Risk: 4.5/5 Reward: 4.5/5
21. Oliver Kylington 6'0" 180 D Farjestad (SHL) G: 2 A: 3 PTS: 5 NHL Comparable: Trevor Daley ISS Rank: 32 CSS Rank: 6 (EU) THN Rank: 20
Jays Says: The best European-developed defender available, few players have watched their draft stock fall as much as Kylington’s in the second-half. He has the type of offensive skill that NHL teams look for in a future power play general, but inconsistency and injury woes have called to question some of his physical limitations. He does not have ideal size for an NHL top-pairing blueliner and will need to develop greater consistency if he is to reach his potential. With his skating and offensive instincts, he could be a stud point producer one day.
Wolfie Says: Kylington started the season as a Top Ten player. A combination of injuries and poor play has kept him from remaining as one. Kylington is a bit of a rover with a package of pure offensive tools. He is an absolutely elite skater with a great shot and solid passing ability. He’ll need to work to become more than just a powerplay specialist but he has the tools.
Risk: 4/5 Reward: 4/5
22. Ryan Pilon 6'2" 206 D Brandon Wheat Kings (WHL) G: 11 A: 41 PTS: 52 NHL Comparable: Bryan McCabe ISS Rank: 45 CSS Rank: 24 THN Rank: 100
Wolfie Says: No defensive prospect in the Draft encourages more debate than Pilon. He possesses the best shot from the point in the whole draft and he knows how to run a powerplay. His skating will be average for a pro. He had an ‘attitude’ label hung on him after demanding a trade out of Lethbridge. But he really stepped up for Brandon this year physically when he was needed.
Jays Says: Had a standout season offensively this season compared to his preceding ones, and demonstrated unknown power play aptitude for a dominant Brandon club. Pilon is an aggressive two-way defender that can log huge minutes and play in any situation. He also has a fantastic point shot that he is learning to get on net more consistently, but there are concerns about his skating and attitude that have not dissipated.
Risk: 3/5 Reward: 4/5
23. Paul Bittner 6'4" 204 LW Portland Winterhawks (WHL) G: 34 A: 37 PTS: 71 NHL Comparable: Todd Bertuzzi ISS Rank: 17 CSS Rank: 26 THN Rank: 17
Jays Says: Physical specimen with a natural release and goal-scoring ability in spades. Was a key component of one of the WHL’s most dominant power plays last year, and is virtually impossible to move when planted in front of the net. Unfortunately, he can demonstrate an indifferent attitude at times and is limited as a play-maker, which will limit his offensive ceiling.
Wolfie Says: A lot of scouts expected more from Bittner at the end of the season playing with Nic Petan and Oliver Bjorkstrand. At his best, he’s a rugged, big body power forward who can bully his way to the net. He’s also got a goal scorer’s release. Has a tendency to wait for the play rather than trying to force things to happen. Needs to play harder.
Risk: 3/5 Reward: 4/5
24. Joel Ek-Eriksson 6’2” 185 C Farjestad (SHL) G: 4 A: 2 PTS: 6 NHL Comparable: Ryan Kesler ISS Rank: 20 CSS Rank: 4 (EU) THN Rank: 27
Wolfie Says: Probably the best 200 foot centre in the whole draft. His defensive acumen draws rave reviews from scouts but he’s also shown a great scoring touch, particularly in close to the net. His skating is above average and the instincts with the puck that have made him a great defensive player showed up offensively at the end of the season. Showed great hands at the Under-18s.
Jays Says: Committed two-way pivot that works hard with or without the puck. Has a quality frame with big shoulders and demonstrates excellent puck protection ability. Starting to put it together offensively and gaining more confidence as a goal-scorer, after being limited to more of a play-making role at the start of the season. Has the type of hockey IQ and on-ice awareness that, with his size and attitude, virtually assure him of an NHL roster spot somewhere soon.
Risk: 2.5/5 Reward: 4/5
25. Jeremy Bracco 5'9" 173 RW USNTDP G: 26 A: 49 PTS: 75 NHL Comparable: Daniel Briere ISS Rank: 28 CSS Rank: 60 THN Rank: 100
Jays Says: One of the highest upside players available, Bracco does so many things well. He is incredibly exciting to watch because of his innate creativity and love of handling the puck, but he demonstrates a goal scorer’s release and is a quality finisher when he chooses to be. His size is a tremendous concern, as he is very weak and easy to knock off the puck, but if he puts it all together he could be one of the steals of the draft.
Wolfie Says: A magician’s set of hands and a quick pair of feet makes him a dangerous and elusive offensive talent. His release should lend itself to scoring more goals but he opts to be a pass-first playmaker. He doesn’t shy away from traffic. He needs to get stronger to handle playing in tight to the net at the next level.
Risk: 4.5/5 Reward: 4.5/5
Edit: this list is continued in the second post of the thread due to text limitations.
Last edited:
