Wanted to look at how Hakanpaa fit into the Stars' defense last 2yrs
Reg Season 5v5
1. Heiskanen 150gms, 19:16 (-5.3dzs%), 56.8xgf% (+2.4rel), 0.92ap/60
2. Harley 85gms, 17:53 (-1.8dzs%), 57.1xgf% (+1.9rel), 1.05ap/60 / Miller 79gms, 15:42 (-3.9dzs%), 53.1xgf% (-0.7rel), 0.73ap/60
3. Suter 164gms, 16:54 (+0.3dzs%), 53.7xgf% (-0.8rel), 0.59ap/60
(X. Tanev 19gms, 16:33 (+9.5dzs%), 61.4xgf% (+4.6rel), 0.76ap/60
4. Lindell 164gms, 15:55 (+7.0dzs%), 54.5xgf% (+0.8rel), 0.73ap/60
5. Hakanpaa 146gms, 15:19 (+7.8dzs%), 50.7xgf% (-3.3rel), 0.54ap/60
6. Lundkvist 119gms, 13:40 (-4.0dzs%), 52.7xgf% (-1.5rel), 0.85ap/60
7. Hanley 58gms, 12:29 (+2.0dzs%), 53.1xgf% (-1.5rel), 0.33ap/60
Playoffs
1. Heiskanen 38gms, 22:45 (-6.1dzs%), 50.8xgf% (-3.6rel), 0.62ap/60
2. Tanev 19gms, 19:42 (+13.2dzs%), 54.8xgf% (+1.1rel), 0.08ap/60
3. Lindell 38gms, 19:06 (+9.7dzs%), 49.1xgf% (-4.9rel), 0.33ap/60
4. Suter 38gms, 18:29 (+2.0dzs%), 53.0xgf% (+1.1rel), 0.51ap/60
5. Harley 38gms, 18:09 (-4.8dzs%), 60.0xgf% (+5.8rel), 0.82ap/60
6. Hakanpaa 15gms, 16:04 (+10.5dzs%), 53.9xgf% (+1.4rel), 0.50ap/60
7. Miller 10gms, 14:31 (-1.5dzs%), 58.3xgf% (+4.7rel), 0.41ap/60
8. Hanley 13gms, 12:09 (+0.8dzs%), 67.4xgf% (+10.3rel), 0.38ap/60
9. Lundkvist 12gms, 4:21 (-16.3dzs%), 52.4xgf% (-1.2rel), 1.15ap/60
2022-23 Pairings
Heiskanen-Miller 724min, 54.1xgf%, 61.7gf%
Heiskanen-Suter 386min, 53.1xgf%, 45.6gf%
Heiskanen-Lundkvist 260min, 49.8xgf%, 40.6gf%
Lindell-Hakanpaa 987min, 50.3xgf%, 52.6gf%
Suter-Hakanpaa 143min, 52.3xgf%, 30.4gf%
Suter-Lundkvist 447min, 53.1xgf%, 45.6gf%
Suter-Miller 229min, 51.8xgf%, 53.1gf%
Suter-Hanley 126min, 61.6xgf%, 72.2gf%
Playoffs
Heiskanen-Suter 324min, 50.0xgf%, 43.7gf%
Heiskanen-Harley 44min, 59.1xgf%, 73.9gf%
Lindell-Hakanpaa 193min, 50.5xgf%, 33.0gf%
Lindell-Miller 63min, 55.1xgf%, 41.7gf%
Hanley-Harley 128min, 69.3xgf%, 69.1gf%
Miller-Harley 60min, 58.0xgf%, 33.0gf%
2023-24
Heiskanen-Harley 605min, 62.4xgf%, 62.6gf%
Heiskanen-Suter 575min, 56.5xgf%, 43.9gf%
Lindell-Hakanpaa 598min, 53.2xgf%, 49.0gf%
Lindell-Tanev 208min, 65.3xgf%, 57.1gf%
Harley-Hakanpaa 190min, 44.8xgf%, 54.5gf%
Lindell-Lundqvist 185min, 48.6xgf%, 61.2gf%
Suter-Hakanpaa 132min, 45.8xgf%, 48.4gf%
Lindell-Suter 131min, 50.0xgf%, 58.3gf%
Lundkvist-Suter 306min, 56.5xgf%, 67.4gf%
Hanley-Harley 218min, 52.9xgf%, 49.7gf%
Lundkvist-Harley 183min, 49.6xgf%, 63.0gf%
Playoffs
Heiskanen-Harley 213min, 55.5xgf%, 63.6gf%
Heiskanen-Lindell 103min, 51.3xgf%, 41.0gf%
Heiskanen-Suter 93min, 50.7xgf%, 51.1gf%
Heiskanen-Tanev 33min, 61.2xgf%, 50.0gf%
Lindell-Tanev 188min, 53.4xgf%, 44.8gf%
Harley-Tanev 87min, 61.2xgf%, 81.2gf%
Suter-Tanev 67min, 51.4xgf%, 61.6gf%
Lindell-Harley 51min, 41.3xgf%, 30.5gf%
Lindell-Suter 48min, 46.4xgf%, 0.0gf%
Suter-Petrovic 60min, 54.1xgf%, 48.2gf%
I'm actually a bit surprised by how big Hakanpaa's role was - he was on the 2nd pair shutdown pair with Lindell mainly. Suter got slightly more TOI than him but as more of a sheltered swingman between the bottom pair and top pair.
And it looks like Hakanpaa's injury is actually a big reason why they went and got Tanev, who took his spot on that shutdown pair with Lindell....and, to his credit, did much much better than Hakanpaa in that role.
We don't want or need Hak in that kind of role, but he might have a chance to look better in a more sheltered role, whether that's strictly bottom pair, or if it's in sheltered usage beside Mo.