• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: Politics & News... Have at it.

Pay for play. You know a special counsel will turn up something. It's pretty much what the Dims are shooting for with Russia.
So in the world according to Habsy, one should investigate a person who is no longer around and it is the same as the President being bed buddies with Russia
 
I'd be curious what your response would be to an opposing counsel that said what you just did.

So much wrong.
 
All this bullshit is another nail in the coffin of the American representative republic system propagated by the fascist left.

Don't like election results? Undermined everything and anything.

America is broken.
 
All this bullshit is another nail in the coffin of the American representative republic system propagated by the fascist left.

Don't like election results? Undermined everything and anything.

America is broken.

I'm glad your hear to post all the talking points that Sean Hannity has in his shows. Allows the rest of us to avoid watching Hannity.
 
Lol. Oh the ironing. People can't have original thoughts if Hannity says something.

It is bullshit. Period. I won't go as far as good ole Sean but it's beyond crazy.
 
You guys should watch Dershowitz on Tucker Carlson tonight. Laid it out exactly the way it is with all the bullshit. Impressive.
 
Re: OT: Politics & News... Have at it.

Here it is.

[video]https://youtu.be/O7WnauFiafY[/video]
 
Re: OT: Politics & News... Have at it.

Here it is.

[video]https://youtu.be/O7WnauFiafY[/video]

I'm watching this with a open mind, but I find it hard to believe that talking to the Russians about wiki leaks and information hacked from the dnc isn't some sort of crime.
 
I'll go with Dershowitz's opinion over anyone here.

The real issue is why appoint a special counsel? There is nothing more here than there was on Benghazi, emails, foundation, IRS targeting conservatives etc and no special counsel.

This is why the term witch hunt is appropriate. The Democrats better be careful with the precedents they are setting. This is absolutely innuendo in search of a crime. None of us here would appreciate it happening to us.

This isn't about Trump, or Russia, it's about half a country boy agreeing with an election and doing everything they can to ensure his policies, and presidency, doesn't get done.

I didn't vote for Trump but even I think he's getting mistreated. When that happens on a great scale, and it's happening, it creates sympathy. The Democrats are doing this with eyes on 2018, we all know it. The problem is this could backfire.
 
You want an interesting read? And this is out of Harvard...

https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-donald-trumps-first-100-days/

ef3fa28f4027b071467069aba149817f.jpg
 
While total stories are at 80% negative. CNN and NBC we're at 93% negative. FOX was at 52% negative.

I love it when people blame Trump for the negative press when it's clear the agenda of the left is to default to the negative.
 
I'll go with Dershowitz's opinion over anyone here.

The real issue is why appoint a special counsel? There is nothing more here than there was on Benghazi, emails, foundation, IRS targeting conservatives etc and no special counsel.

This is why the term witch hunt is appropriate. The Democrats better be careful with the precedents they are setting. This is absolutely innuendo in search of a crime. None of us here would appreciate it happening to us.

This isn't about Trump, or Russia, it's about half a country boy agreeing with an election and doing everything they can to ensure his policies, and presidency, doesn't get done.

I didn't vote for Trump but even I think he's getting mistreated. When that happens on a great scale, and it's happening, it creates sympathy. The Democrats are doing this with eyes on 2018, we all know it. The problem is this could backfire.

Why appoint a special counsel? that you didn't with emails, or benghazi or other things.

1) You didn't have Obama suggest to the head of the FBI that he should just let the investigation go.
2) You didn't have Obama fire said head of the FBI when the investigation didn't go away.
3) You didn't have the President admitting on TV to Lester Holt and in the oval office to the Russians that he fired the head of the FBI to get the pressure off.
4) When people testified before congress, You didn't have democrats waste time questioning them over irrelevant side issues, instead of talking about the actual issue.. ie Russian hacking of the election.
5) You didn't have the head of the House Intelligence Committee running to the White House in the middle of the night to give the President documents he hadn't shown to the rest of the intelligence committee.
6) You didn't have the vice-president repeatedly lie on TV about his knowledge of Michael Flynn's association with Turkey.


Do we need to keep going? Or is that enough of a difference.
 
Re: OT: Politics & News... Have at it.

May you experience guilty by association legal investigation at least once in your life.

Your whole premise is a witch hunt. Little girls point and call witch. You and the rest are the ones giving Russia what they want. They're laughing their asses off at the stupidity going on here and I don't mean Trump. I mean all the Kool Aid drinking simpletons that fell for this bullshit narrative hook, line and sinker because they couldn't fathom Clinton losing to a buffoon.

Congrats on giving Putin exactly what he wanted, destabilization of the democratic process.
 
You want a crime to be proven beyond a doubt before people are allowed to have an investigation.

Think about that for 1 second.

Think about how ridiculous that premise is.
 
You want a crime to be proven beyond a doubt before people are allowed to have an investigation.

Think about that for 1 second.

Think about how ridiculous that premise is.
Don't be stupid, it was already being investigated.
 
To your other point, Dershowitz said the charge is serious. Charge. The charge. Do I need to go on?
 
Back
Top