I'm mixed on this one. I'm assuming the charge stems from the additional shots fired, not the ones that put the Yatim down. Now the question is, is this a reaction to the public out cry or is it actually based on the investigators/crown belief that they have enough evidence to support a second degree murder charge?
I for one wish Yatim would have just put down the knife, or better yet, not had a the knife in the first place.
I haven't found a link to the SIU's report, but if someone does, please post it. I am assuming as you are that the charge is from the additional shots after the pause. (I wonder if the other officer who shot the taser at the end of it all will be charged?)
As for why the charge, I don't think it's entirely because of the outrage, but I
do believe the charges would not have been laid at all without eye witness video <-- the source of the outrage to begin with.
Cameras scare me. Not because I'm doing something wrong, but because without the they don't provide context. I've been recorded struggling with a patient with excited delerium. When the video was taken there was myself, my partner and two cops trying to keep this guy down and secure him to the stretcher. Half way during the struggle I looked up and noticed someone was holding a cell phone taking a video of us (thankfully it was a crappy flip phone so all they most likely got was grainy pixels). But without knowing what was happening it could easily look like we were kidnapping someone.
Videos provide very limited information. But they allow people to believe they know everything.
Depends.
If it's cameras on a cell phone, such as the Yatim killing, where the start of the video is after police arrive on scene, then some context is lost, yes. Remember the Rodney King beating? We only see several officers kicking the shit out of a drunken King. What we DON'T see is the more than an hour long police chase were several cars tried to stop him as he raced away from them. The pedestrians nearly flattened by him as he ran. The parked cars and other cars he damaged along the way. None of which justified the beating, but certainly kills the poor, innocent "done no harm" image he was originally portrayed as.
In the case of Yatim, the eyewitness video clearly shows a long pause between shots. Without that video, we'd all be reading media reports and hearing police say that nine shots were fired, with no pause mentioned. We'd all think it took nine shots to down a crazed young man with a knife who refused the orders of police. The long pause, and the final taser, is what most people think was over the top. Nobody I know argues the first couple shots, especially since the officer had been screaming for him to drop the knife several times before shooting. A policeman has a dirty job to do, and the first couple shots is acceptable for any sane person viewing the video. It's the long pause, and the spray of bullets after that which make little sense to someone with just a knife, in a confined space, with no hostages.
I like the cameras, but prefer if they are running all the time. Some cops are wearing a camera full time on their uniforms as a test project, to see how the general public react when they know they're being recorded. If they can be running all the time, like a security camera, and can catch the entire event from start to finish, it's safer for BOTH the officers and us, IMO.