trujaysfan
Well-known member
You have 0 incentive to tank without your own 1st round pick the next 2 years.If you do move him, does the need to compete now thing go away?
You have 0 incentive to tank without your own 1st round pick the next 2 years.If you do move him, does the need to compete now thing go away?
Suspect its heavily tied to Berube. No coincidence that his worst statistical year since joining the league being tied to a horrible system of hockey that is the complete opposite of the style he succeeds at is making him put pressure on management to make a change
If you do move him, does the need to compete now thing go away?
I gotta think it would be Sharks/Mammoth/Kings as the main suitors.
No. I think if you move him, it's not without getting at least one very high-end young roster player in return as part of the deal.
The Kings will only be a suitor for Matthews if he hits the free agent market. They don't have the assets to trade for him. And Utah? Really? Kinda seems like a kid who grew up cheering for the Nordiques going to play for Colorado.
The Sharks would be an interesting suitor. They've got a bucket of interesting young assets (Will Smith, Michael Misa, Sam Dickinson, their 2nd overall pick).
The biggest complication with trading Matthews in one of these proposals is we'd be decimated at C.Yeah, I don't get Jonas' list of suitors there other than San Jose which makes some sense though their group doesn't really have any post breakout guys other than Will Smith. If we're taking futures here, it would have to be some sort of system crippling event for San Jose. We (or the GM we just hired) isn't really in the position to turn Auston Matthews into a collection of stuff that might kinda replace him in 5 years.
We'd be way better off working with a team like Dallas (who would very much be interested) for Robertson (who they've never really wanted to pay) or Johnston + enough good young stuff to make up the difference. Anaheim would be another team worth talking to, they have a group of young forwards who have all broken out into legit 1st line things, though I think their window would be seen as wide enough at this point that they wouldn't want to overpay.
The only other things that make sense for us would be markets I'm not sure if he would go to. Detroit for Seider, Columbus for Werenski and stuff.
The biggest complication with trading Matthews in one of these proposals is we'd be decimated at C.