Literally just signing Marchment instead of those 2 or Arvidsson instead of Sissons would have changed our forward group so much for the better at similar costs
Yup. It would be very hypocritical for me to pretend I love what they did. Basically everything they did, I've vocally hated for years. It doesn't mean I'm right, but I try to not be hypocritical!I don't think this is a new philosophy from most of the people who are complaining at all.
This is a consistent complaint about approach to free agency for like the last two decades I've been posting here is to just aim for higher.
I can see they big game hunted on D! Fantastic.
I can even sorta squint and see they big game hunted on Bob even if I totally disagree with them.
I think they aimed pretty low for the forwards personally.
I guess there's a few things that could go really right for us that are not Chayka's doing.
Cowan takes a step.
McKenna is a 60 pt guy like some of the 1st overalls that have preceded him.
Tanev healthy (maybe??)
Those could make a huge difference.
Most 1st overalls don’t get to play with Matthews or Nylander all season on a playoff(ish) calibre team. He should be 55-60 points at a min if he gets PP1 time
Maybe, he certainly has more veteran support than they did, is more talented, and more support than some of the previous #1 overalls.
PP should be really great too you'd think.
But anywhere north of 60 is still a big impact and is a reasonable guess.
View: https://x.com/i/status/2073064685113430131
An even bigger x factor than McKenna is this guy being vintage Matthews. If he's that guy, this is a playoff lock, even if a whole bunch of other stuff goes wrong.
My biggest concern is that bob sucks dick and they're too afraid to sit him because he demands to be played, like what happened in Florida last year. That's the ultimate bear case. They're kind of locked into Bob, I have a feeling they're gonna play him regardless, so he better be average.
Lock is aggressive unless Matthews is 50+ goal Matthews. Should still be a playoff team, but there is some downside risk that you can't rule out. Plus they don't play in the PacificPlayoffs are a lock regardless. I don’t know what you’re concerned about.
Bob can’t sink them. The team in front of him didn’t turn out to be the best it could’ve been after July 1, but it’s still very good. But who knows, maybe Chaykes ruins it with a Rielly dump or Knies trade.
Lock is aggressive unless Matthews is 50+ goal Matthews. Should still be a playoff team, but there is some downside risk that you can't rule out. Plus they don't play in the Pacific
View: https://x.com/i/status/2072783358627574229
Lock is aggressive unless Matthews is 50+ goal Matthews. Should still be a playoff team, but there is some downside risk that you can't rule out. Plus they don't play in the Pacific
View: https://x.com/i/status/2072783358627574229
No I'm aware of how good they can be. Tremendous upside, and should be solidly in the playoffs. You're just underrating the amount of downside risk there is in some of their players.I think you’re vastly underrating what McKenna, Raddysh, healthy Knies, Hiller, no Benoit/Myers/Domi/Danza/bums is going to do for the team. It doesn’t hinge on if Matthews reverts to beast version. We’re annoyed by the depth choices and prices but they still improve the team. If health permits, we’ll finish 4th or 5th at worst.
No one here is upset with Raddysh, we're all very pumped for McKenna, we're all excited for no Berube, we all love getting rid of Carlo, Benoit etc.Everyone said before it started that FA market was shit this season.
The top dman available, we got.
The top prospect available in the draft, we got.
We upgraded in net IMO.
We upgraded our HC.
We upgraded by subtraction of some players.