GrandWazoo
Well-known member
6 teams didn’t pass on Lafleur.It's a great comparison because back then Habs also had to wait three years for Lafleur to arrive.
6 teams didn’t pass on Lafleur.It's a great comparison because back then Habs also had to wait three years for Lafleur to arrive.
This is no time to be indecisive. Pick a damn side!I’m on team Switzerland
THAT SOUNDS LIKE APPROVAL TO ME!ok.....
Bumping this just for you.
first pair, second pair, meaningless labels, both pairs basically play the same amountI still expect him to be a second pair minute eating anchor, what's the issue here? That's pretty much why people were pissed at the pick
That is basically what I was thinking.Bumping this just for you.
The issue is we actually need a Markov level dman to just get back to our earlier teams that were still not good enough.I still expect him to be a second pair minute eating anchor, what's the issue here? That's pretty much why people were pissed at the pick
If Hutson provides Markov level support on the PP as QB that’ll more than makeup - Markov for last 2-3 years of service had trouble maintaining pace at 5-on-5, Guhle will grow and provide that defensive capability IMOThe issue is we actually need a Markov level dman to just get back to our earlier teams that were still not good enough.
Hutson is built like a 14 year oldIf Hutson provides Markov level support on the PP as QB that’ll more than makeup - Markov for last 2-3 years of service had trouble maintaining pace at 5-on-5, Guhle will grow and provide that defensive capability IMO
In fact a good strategy maybe to have Hutson play entire PP as QB helping build his TOI while resting Matheson (if around) and Guhle
For sure if the right deal is availableSell high? No… need to take a look at the NHL level.
First pair for us. Nobody in the org chart is touching him on the right side.I still expect him to be a second pair minute eating anchor, what's the issue here? That's pretty much why people were pissed at the pick