• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Leaf Rumours

It's kinda funny, I was just reviewing some draft info over on hockeydb and saw Gunnar there from the 7th round and thought ... that's where the draft really pays off. Get a guy like that for a nothing pick and he's now a key asset. Solid, solid defenseman. Don't see any point in spending assets to upgrade there. Not everyone can be a star blueliner, but we have one already and two coming along. Looks very solid for the foreseeable future.
 
As far as our D is concerned, I really like everybody in our top-six, Fraser is a solid #7, and down on the farm, Stuart Percy and Andrew MacWilliam could both very likely step in and acquit themselves pretty well at the NHL level. Not to mention that John-Michael Liles is down there as well.

We're also 7-3 right now. Just let the group we've got right now play, and see how things sort out. There's no reason to go looking to shake things up.
 
Yeah, I really can't remember the Leafs having so much blueline talent on the roster and in the pipeline. Combine this with solid goaltending and the Leafs should be able to put some contenders together over the next several years.
 
Phaneuf and Gunnarsson are currently 5th and 6th in QoC this year in the league (among dmen who've played at least 5 games).

Not only is Gunnarsson's -0.4 Corsi Rel rating better than Phaneuf, it's comparable (if not better) to most of the top dman who play a similar level of comp.

He's been one of the best and most efficient defensive players in the league this year. And he's one of the cheapest.
 
The guy I would look to trade is Franson.

He's not nearly as steady as Gunnarsson defensively, but Franson's combo of size and offensive numbers would be very appealing to a lot of teams. You'd get a lot more in a trade for Franson than you'd get for Gunnarsson.

Franson's due for a big payday next year, while Gunn is signed to a very reasonable contract. And if you're going to maximize Rielly/Gardiner, they need a chance on the #1 PP unit, which is currently occupied by Franson.

It's not a decision that needs to be made now, but if you can package Franson + picks/prospects for a really good player, you'd have to consider it.
 
They just paid Gagner too...and he's basically a slightly better Bozak...which isn't a good thing.

If you are going to get a number 1, make it a real number 1....
 
"Slightly better Bozak" played at a 30/65 pace last year at 23. (With only 2:55 PPTOI/G)

Find me a readily available C, who can produce at a better rate, and could possibly be acquired for Franson, and I'd love to acquire him, though.
 
Last edited:
I would never want to consider Gagner our upgraded #1 center.

If we make a trade with Edmonton, it should be for a bigger stud, seeing as to how they have several and the collection of them have done nothing to change the course of the franchise.

Give up enough, and I think we could have our pick of any of them. And I'm not even sure which of them I would want, if any, were we to give up a package of good players. RNH is injury prone and not yet showing consistent elite ability, Yakupov lacks much of a track record, Hall has his issues, Eberle is awesome but we kinda have a lot of good wingers already. Seems like we'd only part with good players to get a clear long-term upgrade at center, and not sure Edmonton is the right partner in that regard.

And Franson is a tough one. The guy is still quietly leading our dmen in points with 8 assists. But his level of play has been nowhere near that of last year, and it boggles the mind, especially when he is playing for a contract right now, after coming off an awesome season last year. But then there's the fact that he's the only right handed shot and is built like a tank. The return for him could be better than the value that he himself brings for our team, but he definitely is not redundant on our team by any means nor would he be easily replaced. Like I said, tough one.

But I think he is the most tradeable and would fetch a lot in a package.
 
Back
Top