• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

TML? More like FML, amirite? Yet Another Off Season Thread

Yeah I think holding on to Sandin in the top 4 pretty well ensures they will never have a true shutdown pair and I worry that you can't really win like that. But you still have to find out what he can do in that role. Gotta stop trading young talent before you give them real opportunities.

Not sure what this means - Muzz-Brodie was dynamite.
 
yeah that's the type of thing I could see happening. Dubas' #1 target was Lindholm who went to Boston instead. I think he'd still be interested in a move like that.
 
They all have their pros and cons. If you move Rielly out suddenly their offence from the back-end becomes deplorable. He's not perfect and he requires a lot of responsibility from the coach to get him in the right spots where he isn't exposed (and ideally not hemmed in his own zone) but he is still a huge net positive, on a fair contract and not old. Muzzin is the declining asset, but he has also been their best d for several years so it hurts to lose that. Gio of course doesn't replace what Muzzin has brought to this team and I don't think you're winning the cup with him as the 3/4. Maybe if they had a Hedman type, but they're gonna have to make up for their lack of Hedman with solid depth and no real weak spots.

Sandin... Not sure about him, but I would hate to let him go before he's given a real shot in the top 4. I think they've gotta do it next year and if it doesn't work out you make another Gio trade at the deadline. Unfortunately this just means you've gotta let Muzzin go if you can. Full NTC so he has to be willing and the options may be limited, but I think it has to be the move.
My man, Muzzin was horrific all season long, or injured.

Gio in his short time here was fantastic.
 
I like Lindholm but he also doesn't solve any "#1 dman" issue.

of course not but I don't think that's what Dubas was aiming for. we're not getting a #1 defenceman anywhere but the draft but that is a whole other topic.

the foundation of the defence from a defending standpoint are 2 players who are still good but are leaving their prime and likely to decline. Dubas has to be looking at adding a long term option in the top 4 to help absorb those minutes. It looks like Lilly and Sandin may never be those players.

I know you aren't a Lindholm guy and never have been, but it's more the type of player...under 30 and can be more of a mid to long term piece.
 
You probably have to go with:

Rielly-Brodie
Sandin-Liljegren
Giordano-Holl

I don't love the d but you have to throw Sandin and Timmy into the fire I think. Give them the toughs too. Hopefully by the deadline you can scoop someone up to create a shutdown pair with Brodie for the playoffs if this fails.
The beauty of it is we already know Lilly is ready, and if Sandin takes a bit longer, he can switch with Gio here and there. But I don’t think Sandin is as unready as the rest of you so I have zero concerns.
 
Yeah I get the age/salary argument but given his playoffs bounceback trading Muzz could be a huge mistake. Depending on the return of course.
It could be, but it could also be a massive mistake to keep him. It was 7 games. I’m not betting on Muzz at his age and with his health track record to do that over another 82 plus playoffs. We are overstocked on good LDs. He’s the one to go.
 
All this talk of Rielly is even more pointless than the talk of Tavares. We just extended him for a gazillion years. He’s an awesome player and he’s not going anywhere. Even with Jack’s .897 and playing Babushkie, we outscored TB overall in the series. What D problem? I don’t see it.
 
It could be, but it could also be a massive mistake to keep him. It was 7 games. I’m not betting on Muzz at his age and with his health track record to do that over another 82 plus playoffs. We are overstocked on good LDs. He’s the one to go.

I'm not sure any of them have to go tbh.

We need 7 dmen minimum in a season, especially when one is 39.
 
That's why having a fancy car is worthless. Just makes you a target. A used Kia is the way to go. You won't get laid, but you won't get carjacked either.
So ridiculous. I've driven nice vehicles for 30 years. Never even been close to a car jacking. This is like blaming a girl for getting assaulted because of what she was wearing.
 
Back
Top