GrandWazoo
Well-known member
And here i thought only French Canadians loses Hs.
AhhYou lost an H again man? Hate it when that happens. Need help looking?
I was referring to Geeman moving the goal posts on my statement.
And S at the end of words.And here i thought only French Canadians loses Hs.
Not moving anythingYou lost an H again man? Hate it when that happens. Need help looking?
I was referring to Geeman moving the goal posts on my statement.
Ekblad , short term is manageable. Not what he is looking forWhat 7-8 year that he wants?
Hugo can do both , add and subtract until roster is setRebuild is over.
The build phase is now upon us. Of course it’s harder because you no longer are liquidating assets for futures.
LCS and I were referring to Carrier, not Ekblad.Ekblad , short term is manageable. Not what he is looking for
Does it really matter?LCS and I were referring to Carrier, not Ekblad.
We are not signing Ekblad types with Mailloux needing a spot and Rein another half season of health awayEkblad
Looking at a Stamkos like contract. Probably headed west TO Cali to get away from the CRAJohn Tavares just so WeHave's head explodes
Why does Mailloux need a spot again?We are not signing Ekblad types with Mailloux needing a spot and Rein another half season of health away
You want the best out of every player. RHD tend to be more effective on the right side. I wouldn't want to make Hutson less effective by playing him on the wrong side.Just a question in general. When did this RH vs LH defensemen playing the rights side become a thing ? RHD are hard to come by. I get it. Never heard of it as a priority except the last few years.
But to focus on it as a skill set, it’s kind of stupid. We have perfectly fine left-handed defenseman who can play the right side, such as Matheson. Maybe Hutson as well given his recent play but time will tell.
Why does Mailloux need a spot again?
It does to LCS and me.Does it really matter?
SFB v.2.0?Doesn’t seem the organization is sold on him.
Defensemen playing on their wrong side are simply less effective. Every single play on the board is on your backhand. Skilled players can manage, but they would still be more effective on their strong side. Maybe think of it as playing on your wrong side puts you at 80% capacity. You’re not going to play a lesser player just because of its side, but ideally you’d want everyone playing in their best position.Just a question in general. When did this RH vs LH defensemen playing the rights side become a thing ? RHD are hard to come by. I get it. Never heard of it as a priority except the last few years.
But to focus on it as a skill set, it’s kind of stupid. We have perfectly fine left-handed defenseman who can play the right side, such as Matheson. Maybe Hutson as well given his recent play but time will tell.
Defensemen playing on their wrong side are simply less effective. Every single play on the board is on your backhand. Skilled players can manage, but they would still be more effective on their strong side. Maybe think of it as playing on your wrong side puts you at 80% capacity. You’re not going to play a lesser player just because of its side, but ideally you’d want everyone playing in their best position.
Wingers are a bit different. Some, especially Russians, like playing on their off side. It opens up stick handling and shooting opportunities at the expense of passing. Helps with zone exits too.
RHD are always playing on the right side given their rarity.You want the best out of every player. RHD tend to be more effective on the right side. I wouldn't want to make Hutson less effective by playing him on the wrong side.
I 100% disagree. It’s a lot harder. Not impossible, just more difficult.There is nothing holding you back from playing your offside on D unless you have bricks for feet and/or have poor hockey sense