I wasn't referring to their top 6. I don't expect Gleb to be top 6 forward either.There’s one player above 6ft on Canes top-6 (Svechnikov) & 3 at/below 5’10 (Stankoven, Jarvis & Blake)
I wasn't referring to their top 6. I don't expect Gleb to be top 6 forward either.There’s one player above 6ft on Canes top-6 (Svechnikov) & 3 at/below 5’10 (Stankoven, Jarvis & Blake)
There’s one player above 6ft on Canes top-6 (Svechnikov) & 3 at/below 5’10 (Stankoven, Jarvis & Blake)
Hockey
It's important. Jordan Staal was a huge factor . . . and he's a huge man. The Habs, as a group, are too small. The Canes very big 4th line had us caved in the whole series.Yeah…I wish you were a journalist asking this follow up when Martin Lapointe was talking about how “we all saw the importance of size during these playoffs”
All 4 of their lines had us caved in the whole seriesIt's important. Jordan Staal was a huge factor . . . and he's a huge man. The Habs, as a group, are too small. The Canes very big 4th line had us caved in the whole series.
Agreed but that wasn’t the root cause of being dominated vs Canes…. Every Habs line was at least a step behind their Canes matchup after game 1.It's important. Jordan Staal was a huge factor . . . and he's a huge man. The Habs, as a group, are too small. The Canes very big 4th line had us caved in the whole series.
It's important. Jordan Staal was a huge factor . . . and he's a huge man. The Habs, as a group, are too small. The Canes very big 4th line had us caved in the whole series.
Need them to tire out the opponent.Sure, their 4th line dominated us. But so did lines 1,2 and 3.
The difference in skill was more pronounced than the difference in size.
But I'm happy to have a tougher 4th line. Those 10 mins/per game matter.
Need them to tire out the opponent.
The difference in skill is one thing, but the Canes were also just far better prepared and they just outworked us. After game one, every player on that team was 100% committed on every shift. Marty was severely outcoached too. Dobes was the biggest reason the score was close in a few games.Sure, their 4th line dominated us. But so did lines 1,2 and 3.
The difference in skill was more pronounced than the difference in size.
But I'm happy to have a tougher 4th line. Those 10 mins/per game matter.
their overall talent level was higher too, especially upfrontThe difference in skill is one thing, but the Canes were also just far better prepared and they just outworked us. After game one, every player on that team was 100% committed on every shift. Marty was severely outcoached too. Dobes was the biggest reason the score was close in a few games.