$7m is what I expected but not for only 4 years...I feel like $7 is kinda what i expected tho?
Isn't that the same cap% as those $6m bridge deals we saw guys like boeser sign pre-covid?
Lock up your yutes , success rate is highThe ones where it worked out aren’t great comps though. Pettersen and barzal signed after down years but both had ~ ppg seasons under their belt.
Connor had b2b 30 goal years.
Point and tkachuk were ppg guys in their signing years.
The other guys didn’t really give great value other than maybe Larkin (c).
You didn’t regret any of them. And I don’t think the leafs regret knies at 7 per for 5 but that’s still not a great signing.
Duchene is three games into the third round and Marner still has more than double his points.If Marner is gone they should spend his $14 mill on Ekblad and one of Duchene/Bennett/Nelson, or some other combo of 2c/1D available in a trade.
To spend his money on old wingers makes no sense. The only way you can lose marner and maybe become a better team is if you can get a 3rd line driving center, and the top pairing D they've been missing the entire Core 4 Era.
It's an amazing signing, just for too few years.The ones where it worked out aren’t great comps though. Pettersen and barzal signed after down years but both had ~ ppg seasons under their belt.
Connor had b2b 30 goal years.
Point and tkachuk were ppg guys in their signing years.
The other guys didn’t really give great value other than maybe Larkin (c).
You didn’t regret any of them. And I don’t think the leafs regret knies at 7 per for 5 but that’s still not a great signing.
Duchene is three games into the third round and Marner still has more than double his points.
Nelson went goalless and 4 assists in the Avs' seven game first round loss. Though granted his playoff stats are pretty good otherwise.
Bennett is obviously the belle of the ball but is going to be swept off his feet by some silly number.
If we have to lose Marner, to keep pace we would almost have to get Bennett. And yeah, Ekblad might be a must if he's available. Can they free up enough room though to sign Knies and Tavares, while getting two guys to replace Marner's money? Because let's face it, no single player they will sign will make up for losing Marner. It needs to be two good guys, and Bennett and Ekblad get what, like $16M total?
If losing Marner, that would be a dream summer.Ekblad, Bennett, Tavares, and Knies for around 28m combined would be a pretty good summer considering how bad some of the possibilities here are.
Bennett, though his style of play may make him washed up sooner than later, is still just 28 and at least a decent bet still on a long deal.I don't think Ekblad or Bennett are particularly hard signs if we're willing to go 7 years
They will both have a lot of suitorsI don't think Ekblad or Bennett are particularly hard signs if we're willing to go 7 years