Spence has all the tools as a power forwardHagens
Martone
Frondell
Misa
After that, all solid options F or D but you don’t pass up on those 4 for a positional need.
Spence has all the tools as a power forwardHagens
Martone
Frondell
Misa
After that, all solid options F or D but you don’t pass up on those 4 for a positional need.
we know that will never happen, we never fall into generational types, haven't had one since Roy in 1984I'd be happy with Hagens or Martone but I'd be happier with first overall next year.
No one thought Roy was generational when he was drafted. Im 3 seasons with Granby his GAA was 6.26, 4.44, and 5.55.we know that will never happen, we never fall into generational types, haven't had one since Roy in 1984
then we haven't in 53 years since we took GuyNo one thought Roy was generational when he was drafted. Im 3 seasons with Granby his GAA was 6.26, 4.44, and 5.55.
No one thought Kucherov was generational when he was drafted in the late 2nd round either…No one thought Roy was generational when he was drafted. Im 3 seasons with Granby his GAA was 6.26, 4.44, and 5.55.
nopeWas Roy generational?
No but he was iconic.Was Roy generational?
I agree, I don’t think Lundqvist, Price, Vasy match him during the last 20 years.Not a generational prospect, no. Hard to call the second best goalie of all time not a generational player, though.
My definition of generational is you were labelled the next one to pass the torchRoy was generational. He changed the way the game was played and inspired a generation of goalies.
Brodeur was as good if not better than Roy and he rose to prominence while Roy was still playing.Roy was generational. He changed the way the game was played and inspired a generation of goalies.
Easily. The generational d-men have been: Harvey -> Orr -> Potvin -> Bourque -> Lidstrom -> Makar.Hell I might make the argument that Makar is generational. He's the McDavid of defensemen.
Top 4 d-men are basically indisputable in my mind:I agree, I don’t think Lundqvist, Price, Vasy match him during the last 20 years.
How about Lidstrom, at worst a Top-5 defender all time?
No Hedman interestingEasily. The generational d-men have been: Harvey -> Orr -> Potvin -> Bourque -> Lidstrom -> Makar.
When a player has a HHOF resumé at 23 years old? And he hasn't fallen off, he's actually still getting better?
Only 13 players in hockey history have won the Norris more than once; Every single Norris winner except Subban, Giordano & Carlyle is either in the HHOF or headed there eventually. And had Subban's back not gone out, he would have played long enough to make it himself.
As we speak, Makar has 4 top-3 finishes in Norris voting and he's probably going to win the Norris this year. But let's stick at 4. There's only a handful of players with more:
Raymond Bourque (15!!!! with 5 wins)
Zdeno Chara (6, 1 win)
Chris Chelios (6, 3 wins)
Paul Coffey (6, 3 wins)
Bill Gadsby (5, no wins)
Doug Harvey (8, 7 wins)
Niklas Lidstrom (11, 7 wins)
Al MacInnis (6, 1 win)
Bobby Orr (9, 8 wins)
Brad Park (7, no wins)
Pierre Pilot (6, 3 wins)
Denis Potvin (6, 3 wins)
Larry Robinson (6, 2 wins)
That's the list of all players throughout hockey history with more top 3 Norris finishes than Makar... And Makar's just turned 26. I don't think it's crazy to think he might end up with 8-10 top-3 Norris finishes.