• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Board Bets

JaysCyYoung said:
Why in the holy **** would he say anything about shootout goals? That's like you making a board bet about a player's point total and then saying Mindz didn't say anything about including power play points.

It's obvious that it's inherently included in your agreement given that it's an officially-tracked statistic. This is such a bitch argument to be having. Sack up and accept the parameters of your agreement.

Christ, what a colossal vagina.
Click to expand...

Jays, I'll type slowly so you can keep up.

In all those posts I updated the goals scored vs goals allowed...you know a team's goal differential. ME made no mention of the standings calculation called "goals differential" until today...

Zeke, who is also in on the bet agrees with my interpretation.

Since you were too big a mangina to get in the bet in the first place, why don't you just shut the **** up...
 
Player, who is also in on the bet, calculated it the same way.

11-28-2013, 11:01 AM
PlayerToBeNamedLater
PlayerToBeNamedLater is offline
Legend PlayerToBeNamedLater's Avatar

Join Date
Oct 2006
Posts
29,460

Default Re: Leafs - Sens - Habs 2013-14

Both Sensible and Habspatrol have it wrong.

Goal Diff (Goals For / Goals Against):

Leafs: +4 (68 F / 64 A)
Sens: -4 (74 F / 78 A)
Click to expand...
 
Blueman said:
Wondering what the ruling would be if the bet was kessel vs ryan in goals - would shootout goals count?
Click to expand...

If the league counted shootout goals as part of their officially-tracked statistics, absolutely. Even if Ryan beat Kessel.

Hell, Crosby had to share a Rocket Richard title with Stamkos because the latter had five or six more empty-netters (including one in the final game when his entire team threw him the puck).
 
Habspatrol weighed in and agreed that the one's used for standings are wrong...funny ME didn't attempt to correct him.

11-28-2013, 11:41 AM #951
Habspatrol
Habspatrol is online now
ADMINuteman Habspatrol's Avatar

Join Date
Sep 2006
Location
Lookin for a place to happen
Posts
71,749

Default Re: Leafs - Sens - Habs 2013-14

Quote Originally Posted by PlayerToBeNamedLater View Post
Both Sensible and Habspatrol have it wrong.

Goal Diff (Goals For / Goals Against):

Leafs: +4 (68 F / 64 A)
Sens: -4 (74 F / 78 A)




Sensible is such a coward. Only posts after a win. No wonder he hasn't been around for awhile. Can't come out much when you're still under .500.
I actually figured I was wrong but didn't care enough to do the research. I just looked at the standing on Yahoo.
Click to expand...
 
JaysCyYoung said:
But obviously not enough to try and welch on their agreements. Zero honour.
Click to expand...

Who said anything about welching...

The Sens will be ahead on both counts, but Player, Zeke, ME and myself had all been calculating it the proper way until today, when ME tried to change the bet now that it isn't going his way...

I respect ME and know he'll do the right thing. It's not like I'm dealing with you or Beleafer.
 
SENSible said:
Who said anything about welching...

The Sens will be ahead on both counts, but Player, Zeke, ME and myself had all been calculating it the proper way until today, when ME tried to change the bet now that it isn't going his way...
Click to expand...

Then you have nothing to be afraid of. :)
 
And for the record, SENSible, the reason I never got involved in that bet to begin with is because I have a very high regard for MacLean's defensive abilities as a coach, not to mention how high I've been on Lehner for years.

So don't take it as an insult.
 
JaysCyYoung said:
That's the thing though: he didn't change anything. You're the one trying to alter things now.
Click to expand...

Jays, he changed his interpretation of the bet TODAY. He's had plenty of opportunity till now to post his position and disagree with the way Player, Zeke and I have been calculating it and didn't peep about it until TODAY.

I'm not the one trying to change the bet.
 
JaysCyYoung said:
And for the record, SENSible, the reason I never got involved in that bet to begin with is because I have a very high regard for MacLean's defensive abilities as a coach, not to mention how high I've been on Lehner for years.

So don't take it as an insult.
Click to expand...

You also didn't think the Sens offense would improve enough to overcome your predicted drop in save percentage and thought the Leafs would be far more prolific.

Ottawa has improved from 27th 2.33 g/gm to 11th 2.84 g/gm
Toronto has dropped from 6th 3.02 g/gm to 17th 2.60 g/gm
 
You realize that right now Ottawa is sitting outside of a playoff spot, right? I'm not wrong. You contested the drop in save percentage (right now it sits at a drop of 23 percentage points), and the fact that I said you had to have an upper-echelon offence to make up the difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top