The points will help at the draftBack to .500
The points will help at the draftBack to .500
Yeah, they'll help.a bunch of teams get better picks than us.The points will help at the draft
No, we got the win. If you lose in overtime or a shootout you get a welfare point because losers don't actually deserve any points.We get the tie AND the welfare extra point
Sal and I agree on this point.No, we got the win. If you lose in overtime or a shootout you get a welfare point because losers don't actually deserve any points.
Sal and I agree on this point.
The points will help at the draft
Faceoff in Rangers zone, 11.6 seconds left,power play and The Rangers get the best scoring chances. Agree with Marty………Fck me with this team!
So the only enjoyment in sports for you is championships?The points will help at the draft
It's the journey not the destination.So the only enjoyment in sports for you is championships?
I enjoy seeing kids getting better
After last year's draft debacle(?), I don't think it much matters where we draft beyond the first 2-3 picks in most drafts. Once the obvious choices are gone, we will likely pick the wrong guy anyway. Finishing further back may not make a difference, or maybe we will fluke the right guy at our later pick , or other teams will screw up the earlier picks. So I'm enjoying the games and wins more this year even if the future is questionable. .Yeah, they'll help.a bunch of teams get better picks than us.
I love how you’ve already seemingly written off Reinbacher.After last year's draft debacle(?), I don't think it much matters where we draft beyond the first 2-3 picks in most drafts. Once the obvious choices are gone, we will likely pick the wrong guy anyway. Finishing further back may not make a difference, or maybe we will fluke the right guy at our later pick , or other teams will screw up the earlier picks. So I'm enjoying the games and wins more this year even if the future is questionable. .
No, its more that there were a couple of guys guys I wanted a lot more, one in particular. Reinbacher, from what I can gather, was a bit of a stretch anyway at our spot, and we might well have gotten him later. Or, if not him, a comparable. Finishing a couple of spots higher or lower may not matter in these cases, and I might as well hope for wins I realize.I love how you’ve already seemingly written off Reinbacher.
I would have taken Michkov too, and still would, but if Reinbacher has a Pietrangelo-like impact and career, you can’t really criticize the pick, even if Michkov becomes a star player.No, its more that there were a couple of guys guys I wanted a lot more, one in particular. Reinbacher, from what I can gather, was a bit of a stretch anyway at our spot, and we might well have gotten him later. Or, if not him, a comparable. Finishing a couple of spots higher or lower may not matter in these cases, and I might as well hope for wins I realize.
I have never seen Reinbacher play, and am really hoping he does well.
That Pietro comp trumps a star Michkov unless he turns into a superstarI would have taken Michkov too, and still would, but if Reinbacher has a Pietrangelo-like impact and career, you can’t really criticize the pick, even if Michkov becomes a star player.
But if he’s more Adam Larssen, rip away on HuGo/Bobrov.That Pietro comp trumps a star Michkov unless he turns into a superstar
25+ minute a night 2 way horse D are gold and provide more impact to a game
True but Michkov has to hit big and not be a floater , time will tellBut if he’s more Adam Larssen, rip away on HuGo/Bobrov.
what is the small Russian is more like Perezhogin than Kovalev?But if he’s more Adam Larssen, rip away on HuGo/Bobrov.