But... But... But... I kept hearing the same people over tell me over and over that despite having years and mountains of evidence that giving out term and money to players in their late 20s / early 30s wasn't a good idea, there was no way of proving that those contracts were going to be bad.
Boy, those chickens have come home to roost, haven't they? Now we're stuck.
Petry was the only one that may have aged well , even though he should of been moved
Didn’t expect him to fall of the cliff after 4 solid years in a row , maybe year 4 would of been horrible
I think it’s more of that he is fed up and needs a change and bounce back elsewhere
The other 2 were guaranteed disasters 5 minutes after the ink dried