Not direct but this is what wroteAnybody have a direct link to that?
Not direct but this is what wroteAnybody have a direct link to that?
It won't matter what is written, you want constant negativity, you live off it. Westhead is not fair and balanced. If he were, he would "investigate" the legal basis for Bowman's refusal, speak to experts etc and set them out. He didn't. He rage farmed people like you (and seems to have succeeded)You have no counterargument. You support cover ups because to expose them is "being negative".
The legal.basis for Bowman's evasion of the subpoena doesn't require investigation or explanation. He has the right to remain silent but that silence can speak very loudly. Westhead doesn't need to read anything into it. It's obvious. Bowman was complicit because of course he was. Everyone in the Blackhawks front office knew or ought to have known and they all conspired to keep it hidden. They are all guilty, to one degree or another, and they all need to hang.It won't matter what is written, you want constant negativity, you live off it. Westhead is not fair and balanced. If he were, he would "investigate" the legal basis for Bowman's refusal, speak to experts etc and set them out. He didn't. He rage farmed people like you (and seems to have succeeded)
Weird flex.Imagine being mad at someone for exposing rapists.
The team screwed themselves. He just reported it. You seem to think that he has some duty to look the other way on things just because both he and the perpetrators of the misdeedz happen to be Canadian. You expect him to only report about the bad things people i other countries are doing and to provide cover when it's the home team.He also screwed the soccer team in Paris. While FIFA was investigating he was writing stories about how long it was going on etc. He should have shut his piehole until after the decision. He basically ensured the team got screwed.