JaysCyYoung
Legend
Except that Nieuwendyk had a Calder and 50 goal-season under his belt at the same age.
'88 Flames:
F H.Loob: 80gms, 50gls, 106pts
F M.Bullard: 79gms, 48gls, 102pts
F J.Nieuwendyk: 75gms, 51gls, 92pts
D G.Suter: 75gms, 21gls, 91pts
F J.Mullen: 80gms, 40gls, 84pts
D A.MacInnis: 80gms, 25gls, 83pts
different era.
i get the nieuwendyk comparison.. but that's more of a role comparative than a stylistic one.
if you're talking about a top notch second line centre (borderline first line centre) who plays fundamentally solid hockey, is smart and plays well in all three zones then yes, they are comparable.
in terms of how they play the game.. they really aren't alike at all.
Poni to ATL right after olympic
If you don't like that trade, fair enough.If his name was "Jordan Smith", people wouldn't be so quick to fap off at the mere mention of his name. He may be 6'4", and his last name may be Staal, but he still only scores at the same level as Matt Stajan. Which also happens to be below the level that Kaberle is scoring at....as a defenseman.
Kaberle > Staal
Schenn > Goligoski
Pens 1st rounder = 25-30th overall, and not making up the difference
Honestly man...give your head a shake about that trade proposal. I think I'll hang on to the #1 defenseman who IS scoring at a 60+ point pace (and who does look great paired with Komi, btw), and take a pass on the center who's scoring at his regular 45-50 point pace, but might actually be a #1 center in disguise because his last name is Staal. And then I won't even get into swapping Schenn for Goligoski. I'm not Schenn's biggest fan, but he carries far more trade value than that.
and that's upside for staal. he isn't there yet (and might never get there).
nieuwendyk was a finesse guy through and through. he had wheels and was a top notch skater. staal plays a bigger game, and doesn't skate nearly as well.