Montana
Champion
Friedman on Savard...
15. Here's why the Marc Savard-to-Toronto rumours don't make a lot of sense to me: If you're Peter Chiarelli, why help the Maple Leafs when you've got their first-round pick next year? Maybe Savard costs you a couple of spots. Meanwhile, if you're Brian Burke, do you really want to help the Bruins?
16. A rebuttal from another GM on the question about Chiarelli: "You have to worry about your team first. If getting him off your roster is that important to you, you do it, even if it helps someone else."
17. It's been reported that Savard must submit a list of five teams he will accept a trade to on July 1. That's not true. He has a full no-trade clause until July 1, 2011 - when it becomes limited. Right now, he's only agreed to go to Toronto and Ottawa.
18. Dany Heatley was ripped for signing a no-trade contract, demanding to leave and then blocking one deal. I get that. No problem. So, why is it ok for Marc Savard to sign a cap-friendly extension with similar protection, only to be asked to waive six months later? That's not right. The Game 7 aftermath, where Savard was fingered as the too-many-men culprit, must be a huge factor in all of this.