axlsalinger
Well-known member
Never seen a bunch of supposed "stat guys" put so much faith in a 17-game sample size compiled by a player distracted by a very ill baby before. Interesting.
You guys have a fundamental lack of understanding of just how bad an .868sv%, even over an 18gm sample size.
Shifty team imploding around a player, with a baby born premature and in an incubator. I think I'll ignore all that, and career numbers, and focus entirely on a 17-game sample size.
#frankensteinmoneyball
Can you put aside the numbers enough to give him an extension though given how solid our goaltending's been this year? Do you think that would've been a good idea?
....I don't think anyone here argued they were in favor of giving him an extension, or even taking his entire cap hit next year.
I just looked up one goalie to see if I could find something similar. Between December 2000 and January 2001, over 19 games, Ed Belfour did just that.
Fundamental lack of understanding is all in your court.
Yeah, you keep saying this but BL keeps defending offering the extension.
virtually everyone agreed it would be silly to (a) acquire him to be the #1, and (b) take on his full salary/extend him, if he was the #2.
yep, Eddy had a bad middle two months surrounded by a stellar first two months and a stellar last to months. If you want to use arbitrary end points to make your case, that's fine, but at no point in his career did Eddie ever sport an .868sv%.
Yeah, you keep saying this but BL keeps defending offering the extension.
Always moving the goalposts, eh. You were wrong.
sure, I'm the one moving the goalposts.
Is there even one stat that makes getting Kipper a good idea?
.921 career playoff performance.
.921 over 70 games just last season.
Those are irrelevant though in the face of an 18 game sample.