Wayward DP
Well-known member
I mean, if the polls are right, it's an easy Lib majority. if they're wrong, who the fuck knows...So... What is the concensus? Harris?
I'm going to say slim liberal majority
I mean, if the polls are right, it's an easy Lib majority. if they're wrong, who the fuck knows...So... What is the concensus? Harris?
I'm going to say slim liberal majority
Maple MAGA's don't have skills that any other country would need or want. They have village idiots in every nation. They'll just need to sit there and be talked down to for another decade.Useful link for those who have "I'm leaving the country" friends/relatives
![]()
Countries Archive
Explore countries offering citizenship, residency & passports through investment opportunities. Programmes in Europe, USA, Canada & Caribbean. Learn more here.www.goldenvisas.com
I spoke too soon. apparently there were no lineups over lunch hour. but she did not time herself, so my time stands as the winneryah this is a lesson she needs to learn for herself, apparently...
jeez I'm gonna have to decide if I stay up past my bedtime for election results, game 5, or both.
leaning towards game 5 right now...
Honestly probably #1 for meInteresting hypothetical.
If you could only pick one of these two outcomes, which one would you pick?
1) Kamala Harris wins the Presidency in the US & Pierre Poilievre’s CPC wins a supermajority in Canada.
2) Donald Trump wins the Presidency in the US and Mark Carney’s Liberals win a majority government in Canada.
Interesting hypothetical.
If you could only pick one of these two outcomes, which one would you pick?
1) Kamala Harris wins the Presidency in the US & Pierre Poilievre’s CPC wins a supermajority in Canada.
2) Donald Trump wins the Presidency in the US and Mark Carney’s Liberals win a majority government in Canada.
At the end of the day, Pee-Pee is only a wannabe Trump. Without Trump in power he has no rizz (and no allies in any Democrat run administration) and if he were to be elected he would step on enough rakes soon enough that he would be as reviled as Harper inside of 12 months. But even if he isn't, Poilievre does not pose an existential threat to our democracy unless he is aided and abetted by a like-minded US President. This is why it's so much more important today that the Cons not win; because Trump won. Had Harris won, Poilievre would probably be well on his way to that supermajority today. And that would be bad but not fatal. Trump, however, is a terminal disease. You can "cure" a case of the Pee-Pee's; he's like an annoying rash. But Trump is Stage 4 pancreatic cancer. He eventually kills you.Probably #1 for me too, to be honest.
Only because I think democracy crumbling in the US with a president who sees us as an adversary puts us in a very dangerous position.
You clearly didn't understand the assignment.I'm gonna say #2 on the assumption (hope?) that the repubs lose the House and/or Senate in the midterms