hockeylover
Well-known member
It's fine. I'd almost always rather swing bigger but we'll see how it goes.
Laughton is right in line with the same sort of player a Shanahan front office has thought his team needed at the deadline. Right there with Foligno and ROR.
Has not once looked to add scoring, and is real big on character/toughness/derp.
Laughton at 1.5m takes them out of the running for impact players? Not sureIt takes the team out of the running when impact players come up when we keep using them stupidly
yeah I'm fine with that price tbh.
Laughton is a good player. Consistent 15/40 type offense with no real PP time.
Big Dick Nick looked pretty busted when he got here, and regardless that wasnt the reason they were brought in.Except Foligno and ROR were way better and could score.
Laughton at 1.5m takes them out of the running for impact players? Not sure
Except Foligno and ROR were way better and could score.
You're not getting an impact players for just a 1st tho. I mean I'd love Rantanen but I'm not sure Leafs could beat the stars package.The 1st. Teams like those when they trade good players away
Yep. We're 11th in 5v5 scoring this year and we're blowing our load on acquiring Scott fucking Laughton.
You guys need to lower your expectations.
You're not getting an impact players for just a 1st tho. I mean I'd love Rantanen but I'm not sure Leafs could beat the stars package.
It's fine. I'd almost always rather swing bigger but we'll see how it goes.
Meh from a valuation perspective, it was one of the better trades today. Not necessary to get nitpicky here imo.They can be used in a package?