• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: American Politics

worm said:
I tried to find a legit source. Nothing yet.

But judging from the same language used on all maga accts it is probably alternative facts
Click to expand...

The author of the analysis is John Lott Jr, he's this guy:

71WQ4UQgYtL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg



He's been deep in the right wing thinktankosphere for decades.
 
MindzEye said:
The author of the analysis is John Lott Jr, he's this guy:

71WQ4UQgYtL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg



He's been deep in the right wing thinktankosphere for decades.
Click to expand...

I'd also like to point out that he has a long and proud history of being really, really wrong about things.

1729102672220.png

That was from 1994. I'm sure Boeing's shareholders appreciated this idea, not so sure people flying in Boeing's recently would feel the same way....

1729102752456.png

1729102769161.png


1729102808168.png

But yeah, sure, let's just assume this guy isn't full of shit with his analysis on crime in 2024
 
1729103066999.png


Fuck off Nate.

But...here's my guess as to his conclusion: Just throw it in the average.

My issue is that he and other aggregators are considering a bunch of low quality, partisan polls to not be low quality partisan polls. Oh, this one poll with Fabrizio involved is partisan but the 3 other firms he's involved with aren't? Bullshit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top