I suppose you feel that way about the reality of the constitution then?
The reality of the Constitution... Which part? The Imperial Presidency? Doesn't exist. That the Executive is claiming privileges it doesn't have? Congress has the right to subpoena stuff. In reality almost all Presidents have gotten the response wrong to that. They should have to initiate the Court challenge of said subpoena just like if I was served a subpoena for my tax records.. I have to go to court to quash the subpoena.
Here is a link where Obama was forced to turn over what I typically would find to be executive privilege
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...thhold-benghazi-records-idUSBRE94G0VZ20130517
deliberations to me should be covered. ACTS should not be... But a court thought differently.
Here's a quote: “I don’t trust them as far as I can throw them,” said Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who accused the administration of trying to “stonewall Congress at every turn.”
Apparently Trump doing it is all cool. To a FAR LARGER extent.
You may not like how the Democrats used the rules passed by the Republican house in 2015 to do the lead up to the Articles of Impeachment but to say that they were unfair after having to work within said rules when the President was a Democrat doesn't' stand up to any scrutiny.
Like I said if Trump was fighting for 1 or 2 things I wouldn't back an obstruction of Congress charge. and would want it to go through the courts. but the Whole sale "FU" Has to be responded to differently. If I refused w/o going to court I'd end up in jail for contempt of court.
Where did the Congress not obey the Constitution? (the House in particular)to me here is no conflict in this..
Trump was even invited to the Judiciary hearings and he declined (He has that right) sure the deck was stacked against the minority... Aparently that was all cool with Republicans as long as they were in power.. <Heh>
