• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: American Politics

soco22 said:
I’m waiting for school shootings to easily transition to office shootings and then to put random mass street shootings with how things are progressing.

I don’t feel really that comfortable anymore travelling to the US unless I need to for some reason.
Click to expand...
I basically avoid it unless it is an essential layover.

Think I’ve only been once since Trump and that was to fly thru Atlanta. And I have family on long island.
 
soco22 said:
I’m waiting for school shootings to easily transition to office shootings and then to put random mass street shootings with how things are progressing.

I don’t feel really that comfortable anymore travelling to the US unless I need to for some reason.
Click to expand...
I really do not care if I go back or not. And I live in a border town too.

We used to live in the states, I went to College there, we used to travel all over but now I just do not feel safe.
 
I've been meaning to comment on the Heard/Depp trial for a few days but didn't think it'd be appropriate with the events that occurred. We are perhaps on the eve of the verdict so here it is.

What the post is about:
These are my predictions based on what I heard during the trial. I tried not to watch news sources, or twitter comments etc. though I was not fully immune to that. Overall, I'd say I saw/heard 5% more than the jury did, which can make my prediction biased; so keep that in mind.

Overall thoughts:
  1. Depp: I find it sad/embarrassing with the amount of support Johnny has received, especially outside the courtroom. I have come to accept social media warriors not having sound judgement, but just visually seeing people adore him when he enters and exists the court room is awful. He is obviously an angry, entitled, drug addicted elite who is an absolutely awful partner to have. He is far from a person to be adored. I have no idea why people would adore him watching his screams and tirades and destroying properly like was shown during the trial. He did at least own up to some flaws during the trial.
  2. Heard: Amber came off as also an angry, lying, drug addicted person; so much so that she had 'drugs' written on her wedding itinerary. She admitted striking Depp (more on all of those below). She even lied about her charity contributions.

Predictions:
  • Counter claim: I am 100% sure that Amber will not win her claim. I am 90% sure the verdict will be unanimously not guilty. Reasons: seemed like a lawsuit for the sake of one. I did not hear evidence tied together with the claim.
  • Depp's Defamation case: I believe Depp will win his case and be awarded somewhere along half of what he's asked for. My confidence level is 70% for the win because there could always be a juror who would have reasonable doubt (and justifiably so I should add). Reasons 1- Amber came off as bender of truth throughout the trial. In fact, at one point, she submitted the same photo for two different alleged incidents 2- Despite having multiple chances before, she had never mentioned incidents like her rape allegations until this trial. Seems like something that she would have brought up before if true 3- The TMZ allegations were noteworthy. It certainly seemed like she set up the release of the video 4- for her to be right, there must be so many witnesses lying or wrong. Seems hard to believe 5- quite frankly, and unfortunately so, the way he handled herself in court will have an impact. Sobbing without tears makes it look like she was putting on an act. 6- Some of her evidence was suspect. Photo of the mirror, but not her actual injury.

Having said that, some major items that I think can shift the verdict one way or another.

  1. Pro Amber:
    • The make-up artist for James Cordon mentioned she did in fact cover up a busted lip though source of it cannot be proven. This could give the jury reasonable doubt to return a hung verdict.
    • Depp had some weird text messages implying that he owned women, that the only way out of this was death for Amber etc.
    • Depp, despite his claim, clearly tried to destroy Amber's career. that could persuade a juror.
    • Depp's team tried to make a case that Amber's success was due to Depp; just a bad argument playing to the wrong societal view that women on their own merits can't succeed. Again, this could persuade a juror.
  2. Pro Depp:
    • Amber is the only person who, through admitted evidence, has been physically violent with Johnny. She admitted to punching Johnny and described the incident on the stand.
    • Amber is the only one who has been seen outside the marriage (in an airport), being physically violent with someone else.
    • Her defense, perhaps in desperation, tried their best to stretch the concept of 'abuse' to verbal, mental, physical, etc. In other words, in their view, any marriage that ends in divorce could be ground for domestic abuse. This case started with physical abuse allegations, and ended up with this definition of abuse.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top