• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: Movies/TV Shows

ok-simpson.gif
 
JackBurton said:
The OJ show on Netflix I was going to avoid, just because I've heard so much about the case, I figured nothing else to know. Gotta say, there was a few eyewitnesses and evidence missed they failed to collect I never knew about. It's insane he was found not guilty.
Click to expand...
I either forgot or never knew about how many things pointed toward evidence planting and tampering. I think he probably did it, but I can see where the doubt came in.
 
Habspatrol said:
I either forgot or never knew about how many things pointed toward evidence planting and tampering. I think he probably did it, but I can see where the doubt came in.
Click to expand...
He 1000% did it. The police would have never had the time to have a meeting to frame him and do that.
Also, I didn't know about that witness seeing OJ leaving the scene or the witness at the airport seeing him put something in the garbage from his duffle bag.
 
JackBurton said:
He 1000% did it. The police would have never had the time to have a meeting to frame him and do that.
Also, I didn't know about that witness seeing OJ leaving the scene or the witness at the airport seeing him put something in the garbage from his duffle bag.
Click to expand...
Who said they had a meeting? That would be the least likely way that they'd tamper with evidence. I'm not sure to what degree they tampered and planted, but it really seems that they did more than just make "mistakes."

The fact that the drop of blood on the gate didn't appear in the picture from the original crime scene photos and for some reason contained EDTA is pretty damn fishy. Same with the blood on OJ's socks that was somehow missed the first 2 times it was tested.

I always found it awfully convenient that somehow one glove was found at the scene and then the most racist cop in LA immediately found the other glove in OJ's back yard.

I'm not saying he's innocent, but I can see where there was doubt.
 
Habspatrol said:
Who said they had a meeting? That would be the least likely way that they'd tamper with evidence. I'm not sure to what degree they tampered and planted, but it really seems that they did more than just make "mistakes."

The fact that the drop of blood on the gate didn't appear in the picture from the original crime scene photos and for some reason contained EDTA is pretty damn fishy. Same with the blood on OJ's socks that was somehow missed the first 2 times it was tested.

I always found it awfully convenient that somehow one glove was found at the scene and then the most racist cop in LA immediately found the other glove in OJ's back yard.

I'm not saying he's innocent, but I can see where there was doubt.
Click to expand...
They'd have to have multiple officers decide in minutes to do this. They also would be risking their careers and freedom. Why?
Why did the limo driver see OJ walking into the residence then suddenly answer a minute later when he was getting no response for so long?
That witness who saw him driving seemed very credible.
 
JackBurton said:
They'd have to have multiple officers decide in minutes to do this. They also would be risking their careers and freedom. Why?
Why did the limo driver see OJ walking into the residence then suddenly answer a minute later when he was getting no response for so long?
That witness who saw him driving seemed very credible.
Click to expand...
Why would multiple officers have to decide in minutes? Fuhrman could have found a second glove at the scene and brought it to OJ's. Vanatter, I believe was the one with a vial of OJ's blood at the scene.

Why would OJ risk his career and freedom to kill 2 people?

Eyewitness testimony is super unreliable... but maybe the driver did see OJ walking into the residence... and maybe he didn't.

I'm not saying he's innocent, but I can see where there was doubt.
 
JackBurton said:
He 1000% did it. The police would have never had the time to have a meeting to frame him and do that.
Also, I didn't know about that witness seeing OJ leaving the scene or the witness at the airport seeing him put something in the garbage from his duffle bag.
Click to expand...
Were you there? How can you be so certain?
 
Habspatrol said:
Who said they had a meeting? That would be the least likely way that they'd tamper with evidence. I'm not sure to what degree they tampered and planted, but it really seems that they did more than just make "mistakes."

The fact that the drop of blood on the gate didn't appear in the picture from the original crime scene photos and for some reason contained EDTA is pretty damn fishy. Same with the blood on OJ's socks that was somehow missed the first 2 times it was tested.

I always found it awfully convenient that somehow one glove was found at the scene and then the most racist cop in LA immediately found the other glove in OJ's back yard.

I'm not saying he's innocent, but I can see where there was doubt.
Click to expand...
The cops framed a guilty man. He was acquitted not because the jury thought there was reasonable doubt. They didn't care. This was about sticking it to the man.

And the prosecution was clown shoes from beginning to end, up to and including the point where Marcia Clark started fucking Chris Darden. They failed to counter the race card with the class card.

The salient fact about OJ Simpson as it regards this double murder is not that he was a black man. It's that he was, first and foremost, a wealthy man. Had he been poor and unable to afford his phalanx of high priced lawyers, Simpson would have gone to the gas chamber at San Quentin years ago. He got off because he was rich and famous. When you have enough celebrity and money, your skin tone ceases to matter. The only color that does matter is green.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top