Cmon ...... a near decade of not developing anything other than Pillar is a joke ME regardless if philosophy was to target free agency
It can't be viewed in a vacuum is all I'm saying. If you're not drafting position players on purpose, of course you're not going to develop position players. Overall, AA's drafting was very good (and it's the same staff that wanted Vladdy and Bo, so it's not like they were inept at scouting position players). AA has stated in interviews that his approach was to draft pitchers because he felt they had high trade value. He was right.
Edwin and Jose were complete horseshoe luck deals , pure luck that saved our ass in the standings
Jose was luck. Edwin was a 25 yr old who hit 26 HR the year before that we got in the Scott Rolen trade. That's not luck.
Drafting was horrendous overall under the AA days , not much to show for under his tenure.
AA's drafting wasn't horrendous in the least.
09 - Gomes, Paxton, Marisnick, Loup
10 - Bryant, Syndergaard, Sanchez, Green, Dyson
11 - Nola, Pillar, Desclefani, Norris
12 - Stroman, Borucki,
13 - Boyd, Graveman, Jansen
Too soon to pull any names out of 14 or 15.
The Yankees / Sox have done an outstanding job at the draft table many core players are home grown .
Who have the Yankees drafted other than Judge? Gary Sanchez was an international free agent (like Vladdy), they traded for Torres. The Red Sox didn't do much better aside from Mookie Betts and Bradley.
The Jays have drafted better than either in that time period. Even omitting the guys who were known to be hard to sign that went to college instead (Bryant, Nola), the Jays drafted a high end starting rotation over that period. Noah-Paxton-Stroman-Boyd-Norris would be a top 10 rotation in MLB, maybe fringe top 5. You need to acquaint yourself with the drafting records of these teams you're jerking off about man, this is kind of embarrassing.