• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: World Politics

Every other president would want to know all the latest intel, talk to key advisers to discuss how to frame their comments, before going out to talk to reporters.

This clown does not care about anything but getting in front of the camera to talk about himself. No fucking clue what's going on.
They should just interview Stephen Miller.
 
They should just interview Stephen Miller.


If the press was useful at all, they’d start a concerted push to treat Stephen Miller like he’s the real President and the guy making all the real decisions, while dementia Don wanders around the White House shitting into his diapers.

No better way to get him neutered, fired and pushed right out of Trump’s orbit.
 
If the press was useful at all, they’d start a concerted push to treat Stephen Miller like he’s the real President and the guy making all the real decisions, while dementia Don wanders around the White House shitting into his diapers.

No better way to get him neutered, fired and pushed right out of Trump’s orbit.
A few of us have been saying this for a long time.
 
But the instagram video said....
But, but, the tweet said...something about an unnamed birdie who said that poor innocent Hamas did nothing, while the IDF posts videos of the terrorists crossing the line before getting blown up. And I guess the Israeli soldiers who died over the weekend died of pneumonia. Let's call the Israeli reports into question when a guy who is openly against Netanyahu and Trump says that a birdie told him something. I mean, it's too bad you can't even see how grossly negligent these fairy tale positions are. By all means, always give the benefit of the doubt to HAMAS.

As for the Security Minister, he's from the far right party, and he's pressing Netanyahu to finish off Hamas.
 
A few things....

- The tweet is from this guy:


To call him "against Trump" is completely divorced from reality. I mean, you realize that when a conservative journalist quotes an unnamed source "in the administration", he's talking about the fucking Trump administration, right? Anti Netanyahu? Only to the extent that he doesn't think the US should be as involved in Israel as it is (he says the same about Ukraine fwiw)

- I don't give Hamas the benefit of the doubt, but Israel/Bibi doesn't deserve it either. Bibi has broken multiple agreements before (this is just a fucking fact). Fwiw, I don't give the Trump admin the benefit of the doubt here either. They're not a trustworthy source of intel in 2025 either.

- The ironing should be lost on no one, that you've been shown high resolution, photo journalism quality images of damage to Gaza before and questioned the image from every angle (most of them ridiculous) before dismissing them as valid, but accepting this edited video, the last 2 clips of which are filmed on what I can only assume is some sort of a Russett potato with wings and show absolutely no detail or cohesion beyond "2 guys left this group of six and now we cut to a video of 2 guys in an area completely indistinguishable at this video quality and bang"

The difference here isn't that we're giving Hamas the benefit of the doubt, it's that we give no one involved the benefit of the doubt but you simp for every scrap of social media content pumping Israel's tires. When we question any of it at all for any reason you lose it.
 
A few things....

- The tweet is from this guy:


To call him "against Trump" is completely divorced from reality. I mean, you realize that when a conservative journalist quotes an unnamed source "in the administration", he's talking about the fucking Trump administration, right? Anti Netanyahu? Only to the extent that he doesn't think the US should be as involved in Israel as it is (he says the same about Ukraine fwiw)

- I don't give Hamas the benefit of the doubt, but Israel/Bibi doesn't deserve it either. Bibi has broken multiple agreements before (this is just a fucking fact). Fwiw, I don't give the Trump admin the benefit of the doubt here either. They're not a trustworthy source of intel in 2025 either.

- The ironing should be lost on no one, that you've been shown high resolution, photo journalism quality images of damage to Gaza before and questioned the image from every angle (most of them ridiculous) before dismissing them as valid, but accepting this edited video, the last 2 clips of which are filmed on what I can only assume is some sort of a Russett potato with wings and show absolutely no detail or cohesion beyond "2 guys left this group of six and now we cut to a video of 2 guys in an area completely indistinguishable at this video quality and bang"

The difference here isn't that we're giving Hamas the benefit of the doubt, it's that we give no one involved the benefit of the doubt but you simp for every scrap of social media content pumping Israel's tires. When we question any of it at all for any reason you lose it.
I like how you try to always paint my replies that disagree with you in some exaggerated way. Yeah, I really "lost it" in my responses. Does it make you look better to pretend that I'm flying off the handle when clearly I'm not?

And you need to make up stories now too? The only thing I said about the drone footage was that it was of a relatively limited area, and half of it was just turning around and going right back over that same area. So what are you talking about?

But yes, I absolutely give Israel the benefit of the doubt when the other side of it is Hamas. But a birdie in the Trump administration told this guy, who wants the US to distance itself from Israel, that Hamas didn't do a damn thing other than abide by all the terms of the pact, and that is somehow oh so believable and causes you to question the IDF video footage? Also still waiting to hear how those Israeli soldiers were assassinated over the weekend since your birdie sources are so in the know and super reliable.
 
Back
Top