Habsy
Not playing around anymore.
Do you give Matheson straight up? I don't. I'd want their second with Jiricek.If Dubas is apparently ready to offer up McGroarty, Preds L’Hereux + a couple of 1sts etc I don’t see how Habs can match that…
Do you give Matheson straight up? I don't. I'd want their second with Jiricek.If Dubas is apparently ready to offer up McGroarty, Preds L’Hereux + a couple of 1sts etc I don’t see how Habs can match that…
Yes - as much as I don’t want to for the short termDo you give Matheson straight up? I don't. I'd want their second with Jiricek.
You realize they probably do that deal.Yes - as much as I don’t want to for the short term
Not sure Waddell wouldYou realize they probably do that deal.
Young core NEED to play meaningful games in March / April to gain experience w games of increased intensity.What are we winning with Matheson this season or next? Nothing.
Take the Preds deal and move on CBJIf Dubas is apparently ready to offer up McGroarty, Preds L’Hereux + a couple of 1sts etc I don’t see how Habs can match that…
He would. They don't have the luxury of waiting 3 more years.Not sure Waddell would
No way they offered that packageTake the Preds deal and move on CBJ
Agreed but you need a core group that your moving forward with in placeYoung core NEED to play meaningful games in March / April to gain experience w games of increased intensity.
Only Suzuki & Caufield have experienced it
3-of-4 pts this weekend and Habs are likely within 4pts of wildcard / 5pts of 3rd in division to kickoff Dec w games picking up a notch in intensity as Xmas / New Year approaches
AgreedNo way they offered that package
yes , will hurt but Habs wont do better than that returnDo you give Matheson straight up? I don't. I'd want their second with Jiricek.
Team building is not binary, it’s a constant process over time - just don’t flick a switch when you’ve got that “group” in place because that situation may never manifest due to constant change nature of modern NHLAgreed but you need a core group that your moving forward with in place
Team has major turnover every year in a rebuild
Do you give Matheson straight up? I don't. I'd want their second with Jiricek.
Do you give Matheson straight up? I don't. I'd want their second with Jiricek.
Exactly but battle tested late in the year in more meaningful games means nothing when your turning over 1/3 roster every yearTeam building is not binary, it’s a constant process over time - just don’t flick a switch when you’ve got that “group” in place because that situation may never manifest due to constant change nature of modern NHL